Re: 742 woodmaster
Gojoe
Yesterday at 09:47 PM
I have my Dad"a 742 in 308 win. He bought it in 1972-3. He used it as his one hunting rifle. I have shot it and it shoots well. I have thought of hunting with it. But after reading on the web, I worry that it will break. So an occasional trip to the range with mild hand loads and back in the safe.
6
414
more...
|
|
Re: If Trump is elected what are his first moves
Crash_Pad
Yesterday at 09:45 PM
I think it will have to be the removal and replacement of Wray and the CIA director Burns and Garland. Then the arrests of all who worked to suppress political speech on social media. DHS would face similar actions, CISA also. Since Trump would have to use the DOJ to pull off much of this, none of whom have shown the slightest hint of integrity I don't see it happening. His first four years were interfered with to an incredible degree, I see this happening again. For this single reason I don't see the election of Trump as anything but the ignition of unrest.
Anyone with a more positive view? Care to share it? The Election is for President, not Grand Emperor King and Dictator for Life. Yes, President - and the needed correction of accrued negative drift and corruption is the JOB of the President. The noted work does not at all signify a role as "Grand Emperor King and Dictator for Life." If the President can get it right during the upcoming 4 year term, those next elected should be held accountable for sustenance of a democratic republic based on Constitutional values and precepts. No Emperor needed - just the vigilance and sensible voting of the citizenry. We live in a Republic with a president of limited powers. Even if we, hold on to The House, he still has to contend with RINO's there, and even in the best of scenarios it's unlikely we'll get 60 in the Senate, which will further limit his power to hold those you mentioned accountable. We do not live in a Republic! We are serfs on globalist oligarchs’ estates. We have heroic legends. Oh, and we can vote!
111
3,746
more...
|
|
Re: Baboon Hunting - This looks like a blast!
AcesNeights
Yesterday at 09:43 PM
I’ve always wanted to do that…ever since reading Ruark and his full auto story I’ve thought it would be a blast. They wise up faster than the baboons in Chicago too. 😂 Capstick. Not Ruark Correct….my mistake. I’ve read so much that I forgot it all. 😀
25
2,529
more...
|
|
Re: Working up a load for .22-250
bsa1917hunter
Yesterday at 09:42 PM
A few months ago, I picked up an almost finished, apparently never fired FN-action, custom .22-250. With her brand new 12x SWFA scope, bipod, and sling, she's a svelte 13.8 pounds with a 26" barrel. I've attached a picture below. The price, even after finishing her up and putting a scope on her, was right. That's all there is to say about that. It's time to sight her in and then work up some handloads. Part of the reason I got this rifle was to experiment with mid-range shooting and start using a scope with turret dials for the first time in my life. I have been very successful using Kentucky windage for hunting, but it does sometimes get a bit hard to make the right holdover or offset at longer ranges, so I want to develop my skills in that regard. I'm only planning to shoot ground hogs and targets (and any coyotes that happen to come out in broad daylight while doing the same) out to 600 yards, so I don't think I need to consider any of the heavy bullets, but I would like to better understand my rifle so I can have the right stuff on hand when I start experimenting. And, as you can see, she's pretty. As far as I can tell, after measuring it several times, she has a 1-14 twist barrel, which means she was designed to shoot very light bullets, right? That is my understanding after reading this: https://www.ammunitiontogo.com/lodge/22-250-twist-rate-chart/#:~:text=For%20.,except%20the%20most%20heavy%20cartridges. Is the chart correct that I should expect the best results from bullets 50 grains and under? If so, are there any bullets which people particularly recommend? Ground hogs aren't particularly hard to kill as long as you hit them anywhere in the body, but I would like something that gives accurate results as far out as possible. I have heard of light bullets tearing themselves to pieces if fired in too fast a twist (I don't think I will have that problem). I have also heard of massive instability issues when using the wrong bullet weights in .22 caliber rifles. I have also read the following on here: The formula is to stay under 300,000 RPM MV x 720 ÷ Twist = Bullet RPM From: https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt...342200/re-new-22-250-barrel#Post19342200As far as I can tell, a bullet would have to be going ~5800 FPS in a 1-14 barrel to get close to 300,000 RPM. For reference, the factory loads I picked up for sighting in the rifle are Hornady 50-grain VMAX at 3800 FPS. Clearly no issues there. But that cannot be the entire story, right? Where does this 300,000 RPM come from? Where does 720 come from? Just trying to understand the science behind the equation so I can gain greater understanding. I'm also trying to understand the relationship between twist rate and bullet length, because that must play some role, right? A 55-grain all copper bullet is longer than a 55-grain lead cored bullet. Surely that plays a role in the stability to some extent, right? Thank you for any assistance you can offer. It really depends on the length of the bullet. Generally most bullet manufactures load manuals will say if a certain twist rate is not recommended for a certain bullet. In the Hornady manual, for example, it says a 53gr V-max will not stabilize in a 1 in 14" twist barrel. A lot of that will depend on your altitude. Where I shoot (above 5,000') they stabilize just fine in every 14 twist rifle I own, so I use the hell out of them. If you look, that bullet also has a higher BC than other bullets in that range. Even higher than a 60gr and 55gr V-max. I'd buy one box of those and give them a whirl. If it does stabilize, work up a good load and don't look back. I hate to say it, but you want to shoot out to 600 yards, your options are limited with that twist rate. I've done it with the 53 V-max, and it does alright, but I'd much rather be shooting a 77, 80 or 88gr pill. Something you just can't do with your particular rifle. Here's an example of what one of mine will do with that bullet: 400 yards: 600 yards:
3
301
more...
|
|
Re: 375 Brush Gun - Rescue!
BMT
Yesterday at 09:40 PM
So what’s the answer?
This one has me curious.
Always wanted a .375 never got around to it.
Passed on a Ruger #3 in .375 years ago—woulda, coulda, shoulda.
BMT
23
2,008
more...
|
|
Re: 22 Creedmoor "which bullet"
Woodhits
Yesterday at 09:33 PM
Derrick at Horizon has more experience with the cartridge than anyone as swears by the ELD-X. I didn't get any ELD-X bullets until the last week of deer season so I didn't get to try them out on meat. My son shot a doe with the 80gr. ELD-M and her onside lung more or less vanished...
I want to try both the ELD-X as well as some monolithics out on hogs.
11
1,647
more...
|
|
Re: The Federal Budget
HughW
Yesterday at 09:29 PM
Wannabebwana - in reading that article my first thought is that PP will not have trouble identifying areas to reduce the budget and the size of those departments.
Trudeau and the Liberals just doing what they do best --- divisive favortism
11
722
more...
|
|
Re: Ruger American Gen 2
KenMi
Yesterday at 09:27 PM
It was a hairbrained half-assed idea on their part to use the AR mags on that bolt action.
They should have just stuck to the simple polymer stack magazine like they provide on the 450. Many use those in place of the rotary mags.
They had to butcher the bolt body to get the action to work with the AR mags. Many were hoping the Gen2 rifles would drop the AR mags. No luck.
13
1,477
more...
|
|
|
614 members (12344mag, 007FJ, 10ring1, 1936M71, 10gaugemag, 160user, 77 invisible),
2,432
guests, and
1,125
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,118
Posts18,464,562
Members73,925
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|