24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 366
A
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 366
Academic question regarding sectional density.

Given the same bullet construction and weight, would you rather have a smaller caliber (and higher SD) or larger caliber (and lower SD) on big game?

Here's my situation. I'm deciding on what rifle/cartridge to get my recoil sensitive wife for a caribou hunt. It would be a major plus if the same load was appropriate for moose however it needs to be soft shooting so she can comfortably practice a lot with it. I've boiled it down to one of the 6.5's (swede, cm, or rem), 7mm-08 or a plain jane 308. I'm looking at loads of 140 grains in the 6.5, 150 in the 7, 150 in the 308. I reload.

I've been reading a lot about the 6.5's lately and their great SD advantages but I'm trying to weigh that against the conventional wisdom towards a 30 caliber. If I am going to be loading any of these cartridges in the 140-150 grain area to about 2700 fps, am I correct to lean more towards the 6.5 for higher SD and likely deeper penetration?

Thanks

BP-B2

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,586
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,586
All things being equal - give me the SD - I can't see where it would hurt.

Given what you list - I'd prob end up with a 7-08 in TSX of some sort for both the moose and caribou.


Me



Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,045
A
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
A
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,045
SD is more theory today as bullet construction can deflate that number considerably once game his impacted.

Because it was originally intended as a measure for full patch or steel jacketed non expanding bullets, I give it little attention with today's modern expanding bullets which are well designed and or homgeneous which again, deflates the argument when talking penetration.

If you chose Barnes TTSX bullets in your chosen bullet weights, all would suffice, likewise Nosler Accubonds or Partitions in the same or next weight up the scale would also be fine.
John


When truth is ignored, it does not change an untruth from remaining a lie.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,237
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,237
If you can't kill it with a 140gr. 7mm TTSX at 2700fps, you probably need something that starts with .375.


molɔ̀ːn labé skýla
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Originally Posted by teal

Given what you list - I'd prob end up with a 7-08 in TSX of some sort for both the moose and caribou.


This is the road I'd take. I killed a pile of caribou years ago with 140 Xs; never recovered a one. Poked a hole through a moose with one - in the slats; that one was lost as well….the bullet that is. Everything I hit with those bullets is long since eaten and gone. I have had a lot less difficulty stopping 6.5 bullets for some reason, whether in caribou or moose.


Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
IC B2

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,114
S
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,114
I believe the questions more points to what platform (specific rifle and fit for her) and whether or not you are a reloader.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,752
S
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,752
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
Originally Posted by teal

Given what you list - I'd prob end up with a 7-08 in TSX of some sort for both the moose and caribou.


This is the road I'd take. I killed a pile of caribou years ago with 140 Xs; never recovered a one. Poked a hole through a moose with one - in the slats; that one was lost as well….the bullet that is. Everything I hit with those bullets is long since eaten and gone. I have had a lot less difficulty stopping 6.5 bullets for some reason, whether in caribou or moose.


I would do what ever Klik says. He's probably shot or witnessed the shooting of more caribou and moose than the rest of us combined.


The critters have to win every time, I only have to win once. www.swanspointoutfitters.com
www.lazybar-t.com outfitters
65-43-22-5
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Originally Posted by Klikitarik
Originally Posted by teal

Given what you list - I'd prob end up with a 7-08 in TSX of some sort for both the moose and caribou.


This is the road I'd take.

I have had a lot less difficulty stopping 6.5 bullets for some reason, whether in caribou or moose.


Never used a 6.5 to shoot an animal, but.....why do I have this sneaking hunch that a 6.5 ain't.....quite.....a 7mm? confused whistle smile




The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,363
3
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
3
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,363
Some here rave about results achieved with the 7mm 120 NBT,
due to its' thicker jacket, and the consequent controlled expansion.

Shot placement is the real issue, SD not so much.


Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
338:yup...... It's a number. smile




The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
IC B3

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 670
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 670
Originally Posted by akmtnrunner
Academic question regarding sectional density.

Given the same bullet construction and weight, would you rather have a smaller caliber (and higher SD) or larger caliber (and lower SD) on big game?

Here's my situation. I'm deciding on what rifle/cartridge to get my recoil sensitive wife for a caribou hunt. It would be a major plus if the same load was appropriate for moose however it needs to be soft shooting so she can comfortably practice a lot with it. I've boiled it down to one of the 6.5's (swede, cm, or rem), 7mm-08 or a plain jane 308. I'm looking at loads of 140 grains in the 6.5, 150 in the 7, 150 in the 308. I reload.

I've been reading a lot about the 6.5's lately and their great SD advantages but I'm trying to weigh that against the conventional wisdom towards a 30 caliber. If I am going to be loading any of these cartridges in the 140-150 grain area to about 2700 fps, am I correct to lean more towards the 6.5 for higher SD and likely deeper penetration?

Thanks



Easy question to answer;

Back many years ago when I was a young Guy I booked a Canadian moose hunt with my 25-06 because I was inexperienced, poor boy , and short of cash as well as experience and knowledge. My guide told me that I was seriously under gunned. None the less I was a very accomplished marksman and spined my moose that dropped in his tracks.

Later, as I gained experience and knowledge I escalated my repertoire to .30 caliber and .338 calibers of medium and big North American Game and minimum African compliance legal .375
and bigger.

Sectional density is perhaps pertinent but at the same time relatively immaterial to rifle, bullet performance. To whit:

#1. I really like the 6.5x55 Swedish Mauser which I own. A unique cartridge well seen in good esteem.

#2. However, for your wife's application I have to go with minimum .30 caliber such as .30-06 Springfield for Moose and caribou as well as mule deer and white tails and antelope.

For bench rest practice you can always significantly down load to attenuate recoil bench rest shooting to proof loads and sight in.

Some of my heavier calibers kick the snot out of me - OUCH!!! I developed some counter measures such as a Past shield strap on and some hokey lumber inventions that are too embarrassing to describe here but detailed/included shotgun lead shot bags to soak up the recoil.

I have universally found that whatever recoil backlash/kicks I have suffered on the bench at the range mysteriously disappear when I am in the field shooting real animals.


Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,096
T
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
T
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,096
Sectional density doesn't mean squat with the amazing selection of bullets we have at our disposal today. Load it with monos, NPTs, Northforks, or some other stout deep penetrating bullet and make sure you knife is sharp

Furthermore, I've found caribou to be the easiest species of the deer family to kill. I'd bet on any given day of the week that a 125 pound whitetail will take more killing than the biggest bull caribou you can find. Moose IME aren't too hard to kill either, they may stand around for a while after you poke them but they usually tip over pretty easy. I used to think otherwise, but I've seen little kids knock over some pretty big bulls in the last few years using 243s and factory ammo.

Get her a good fitting rifle in any of the calibers you've mentioned and keep her in practice ammo. When hunting season rolls around load her up with premium bullets and make sure your knife is sharp.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,944
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,944
Here is another suggestion: Get your wife shooting more, so that the recoil sensitivity diminishes some. My wife is 5'5" average build, she'll pass on a 7mm-08 every day of the week and pick her lucky 300 wsm out of the rack every day. It is lucky too, got her first elk with it, first buck and many since, and last fall she killed a dandy Shiras moose with it as well. Its a good thing we have 2 freezers.

Also, above all else make sure the rifle fits her well. I put youth stocks on my wifes rifles and that made the difference. Good luck and happy hunting.

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
P
prm Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
Given your assumption of similarly constructed bullets, SD may have some utility in making comparison. In actuality though, so many bully's perform so well I'm not sure it really has a practical value.

For what you describe, I would lean 7-08. But a 130 TTSX from a .308 would work really well I'll bet.

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,558
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,558
I had the same issue with setting up a 7mm-08 for a buddy. Here's a thread I started asking for 7mm bullet opinions. I think I would lean toward a 120 TTSX in a 7mm-08 and call it a day. There's a pic of a moose in the thread taken with that combo. If not the 120 TTSX, I think I would go 140 PT. I like to start the TSX type bullets faster than the 140 will go in a 7mm-08 if at all possible.
http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/9553070/2

I know a lot of folks speak VERY highly of the .264's, but I just cant wrap my head around it for moose size game if other options are out there. But, that is strictly my head speaking. Never been after a moose, so I'm just passing along what my research has led me to.

With that said though, here's a link to a site detailling the viciousness of 120 TTSX in a 6.5. Go to the bottom of the hand-loading section under the barnes bullets. He tests bullets for a living, so I generally trust his input.
http://www.ballisticstudies.com/Knowledgebase/6.5x55.html

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
Pick whichever rifle fits her and go for it. Buy a lead sled for her to practice with until she is more comfortable with the rifle. She will not feel the recoil when shooting at an animal anyway.


You did not "seen" anything, you "saw" it.
A "creek" has water in it, a "crick" is what you get in your neck.
Liberals with guns are nothing but hypocrites.
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Originally Posted by AussieGunWriter

Because it was originally intended as a measure for full patch or steel jacketed non expanding bullets, I give it little attention with today's modern expanding bullets which are well designed and or homogeneous which again, deflates the argument when talking penetration.
John

As I was growin up in the handloading practice, we DID NOT have the monos of today. We had N P, Bitterroot, and only a couple more that I knew about.

AGW hits the nail on the head.

Even at that, S D is a no. that can show 'relativity' between bullet 'shapes'(length/dia).

Early on "GIVEN the same construction" (IMPORTANT) S D served a good purpose to indicate how different bullets---SHOULD---penetrate compared to each other.

AS AGW says, many modern bullets have erased that need.

Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,699
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,699
Originally Posted by sbhooper
Pick whichever rifle fits her and go for it. Buy a lead sled for her to practice with until she is more comfortable with the rifle. She will not feel the recoil when shooting at an animal anyway.



I read/hear this a lot. And the shooter may not notice recoil/blast at the time. But more often than not a person who has come to dislike recoil/blast will exhibit being affected by it, even while not noticing it.

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
M M

Not to totally disagree w/you.

Some of us are focused, or excited, or intent that we (some) -don't - notice recoil 'unless' it is very stout.

Many many Xs when shooting game I never 'feel' any recoil.

Some can't believe that. Ask me if I care.



edit - do>>>don't

Last edited by jwall; 08/25/15.

jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,699
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,699
Having similar experience, I agree that in the heat of the moment we don't feel recoil and hear the report the same way we do on the range.

What I wrote about is someone who is put off somewhat by the recoil/report of their rifle at the range will be negatively affected in the field, even if they don't recall recoil/noise afterward.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
731 members (10gaugemag, 222Sako, 16penny, 160user, 12344mag, 21, 73 invisible), 2,693 guests, and 1,368 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,623
Posts18,398,611
Members73,817
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.282s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9019 MB (Peak: 1.0586 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-28 15:20:53 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS