24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 183
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 183
If anybody happens to own a RAR Predator or Ranch in 223/5.56, I'd be really curious to know the COAL to the lands with a common bullet (69/77 SMK, 75 Amax, whatever).

Thanks much!

GB1

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,854
2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
2
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,854

My Ranch went 2.525" COL with a 75 AMAX jammed into the lands.

It's chambered in 5.56, so longer throat. Is the Predator chambered in 5.56?? If not, it probably has a shorter throat.





Sent from my Dingleberry Handheld Wireless
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,311
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,311
Ruger lists the Predator as a 223... So the length to the lands should be (?) less. Am curious myself.

Jerry


Si vis pacem, para bellum
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,049
M
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,049
I've got a 223 Predator.

A Hornady 75gr BTHP hits the lands at about 2.275" oal.




By oal, I mean to the tip of the bullet.

Last edited by MontanaMarine; 09/06/15.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,960
M
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,960
RAR Predator 223. 2.42" kissing a 75gr. Amax


Mark

NRA Life Member
Anytime anyone kicks cancers azz is a good day!

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Oh The Drama!
IC B2

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,137
1
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,137
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
I've got a 223 Predator.

A Hornady 75gr BTHP hits the lands at about 2.75" oal.




By oal, I mean to the tip of the bullet.


Are you sure about that...must be just in the neck?
I would have though 2.375

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,314
S
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,314
The Predator and Ranch are two different animals. The Ranch chamber is much longer due to the 5.56 reamer. The Predator has the shorter 223 chamber...


I enjoy handguns and I really like shotguns,...but I love rifles!
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 183
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 183
Originally Posted by shortactionsmoker
The Predator and Ranch are two different animals. The Ranch chamber is much longer due to the 5.56 reamer. The Predator has the shorter 223 chamber...


Indeed.

Which I why I asked about COAL to lands of both grin

Got those magazine end caps allowing long OALs going yet? confused

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,314
S
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,314
Nope, but I think I may have found a potential solution.


I enjoy handguns and I really like shotguns,...but I love rifles!
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,264
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,264
I am interested in the ranch as a truck/fun/kid gun on the cheap. But the mag OAL issue has me concerned that I won't be able to take advantage of heavier pills. Are you guys finding it to be as accurate as the other versions? Does it have issues with OAL with say 75 amax? What's the verdict? Thanks

IC B3

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,049
M
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,049
Originally Posted by 10at6
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
I've got a 223 Predator.

A Hornady 75gr BTHP hits the lands at about 2.75" oal.




By oal, I mean to the tip of the bullet.


Are you sure about that...must be just in the neck?
I would have though 2.375



I meant to say 2.275" oal. Throat is not excessive.

Thanks for catching me there.

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,854
2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
2
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,854
Originally Posted by kevinJ
I am interested in the ranch as a truck/fun/kid gun on the cheap. But the mag OAL issue has me concerned that I won't be able to take advantage of heavier pills. Are you guys finding it to be as accurate as the other versions? Does it have issues with OAL with say 75 amax? What's the verdict? Thanks


You'll need to extend the mag length. shortactionsmoker is working on a solution. Some of us have already received modified magazine backs that will accept longer COL.

Help is coming, but it may be awhile.



Sent from my Dingleberry Handheld Wireless
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,401
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,401
SAS needs to get out of that darn gun shop and start working on the magazines and hunting.... grin


“There are some who can live without wild things and some who cannot.”
ALDO LEOPOLD
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,264
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,264
So with the ranch being available as a compact and threaded it is very appealing as I will be ordering a suppressor sometime this winter. I have a 5 year old and 4 month old that will be raised to hunt and shoot, and the suppressor will make it more pleasant for all of us hunting and shooting. The compact stainless is not threaded, but has the 223 chamber. Is the ranch NATO chamber a deal breaker with 75 amax without the mag extension. I would love to have a couple extended mags, but it seems this venture is taking quite a while( I understand why, and I am in no way harping on SAS or Cotis). So what would you guys do? Or would you look at other youth rifle like a model seven youth

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,264
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,264
Buy a compact stainless 223 chamber and have threaded?

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,854
2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
2
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,854
Originally Posted by kevinJ
So with the ranch being available as a compact and threaded it is very appealing as I will be ordering a suppressor sometime this winter. I have a 5 year old and 4 month old that will be raised to hunt and shoot, and the suppressor will make it more pleasant for all of us hunting and shooting. The compact stainless is not threaded, but has the 223 chamber. Is the ranch NATO chamber a deal breaker with 75 amax without the mag extension. I would love to have a couple extended mags, but it seems this venture is taking quite a while( I understand why, and I am in no way harping on SAS or Cotis). So what would you guys do? Or would you look at other youth rifle like a model seven youth


Get the Ranch and shoot shorter COL until you find a solution. I know member 16bore had ordered a mag for one with a longer box. You might pm him and ask. He had a thread not too long ago on it.

ETA: oops. Sorry. 16bore's mag was for a Tikka. NOT for a RAR.

Last edited by 257heaven; 09/08/15.

Sent from my Dingleberry Handheld Wireless
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,264
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,264
Thanks

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 18,075
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 18,075
2.581" OAL into the lands with 75 gr Amax in 5.56

2.036" ogive to lands with same

Mike


God, Family, and Country.
NRA Endowment Member


Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
D
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
You could get the stainless compact and have it threaded easily once you get the suppressor. Best of all worlds.


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

719 members (12344mag, 1234, 10Glocks, 10ring1, 01Foreman400, 160user, 76 invisible), 3,104 guests, and 1,266 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,267
Posts18,467,242
Members73,925
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.118s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8764 MB (Peak: 1.0055 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 01:32:54 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS