24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
D
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
A friend bought a RAR and wanted me to lighten his trigger. He likes them at around 2# or so. I took this one down to a little over 3#'s with all the tension off the spring. I would need to go with a weaker spring to adjust below 3#'s. With the adjustment screw completely out of the trigger housing, the spring stays in. So, I guess the trigger would have to be taken apart to get to that spring.

This is the first RAR trigger I've messed with. I have experience taking 700 triggers apart, etc. Just hate to tackle one I've never taken apart before and on another man's gun.

Any suggestions or help would be appreciated.

DF

GB1

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Y
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Y
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
They come apart pretty easily, not too much fuss. If you're taking the sear apart it's a little more complicated to get back together, you have to compress a spring while driving a pin back in, but it's not too bad. The trigger spring is pretty easy though.

You can get a different spring, or cut/compress a couple coils on the factory spring. I prefer to heat a couple coils red and compress them, it leaves a more stable base for the spring than cutting, but either way works.

My RAR trigger is down around 2-ish lb doing this, although I also stoned the sear a little to get rid of most of the creep; it had quite a bit of creep out of the box.

Last edited by Yondering; 10/06/15.
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
D
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
Thanks, may give that a whirl.

DF

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
D
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
Just got back from the shop. Removed the trigger "C" clip and pin, then the trigger. Removed spring, cut a couple links off and replaced it. 2 1/4# pull without creep.

My bud will be very pleased.

Thanks,

DF

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
How many coils did you snip I would like to lighten mine. Any pics

IC B2

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
D
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
Two coils at first, then an additional half coil.

The trigger is easy to take apart, much easier than I thought it would be, much easier to work on than a 700 trigger.

Sometimes inexpensive triggers don't respond well to light settings, develop creep and/or instability. Not this one. It may be low cost, but it ain't cheap. Quality for less, sorta typical for Ruger.

I'm impressed. I've worked on a lot of guns over the years. The RAR is a masterpiece of low cost, high quality design/engineering/manufacturing.

The bedding points, front and rear of the box mag, is a lot like my Alpha Arms Alaskan. Same idea. The way the stock attaches to the action is pure genius, more for less.

DF

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Y
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Y
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
DF, I agree, lots of good engineering went into the RAR to make it good but also easy to manufacture. Good example of "work smarter not harder".

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
D
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
I don't have an RAR.

If someone needs a low cost, high quality rifle, the RAR is a great choice.

I think Ruger knocked this one out of the park.

DF

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
Mine shot a eight shot group at a MOA at seven hundred yards tonight.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,999
C
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
C
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,999
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer

The RAR is a masterpiece of low cost, high quality design/engineering/manufacturing.
DF



Fact.

Not much left to be said.

Only 'improvement' I've made to my .308 was to tune the trigger and fully bed the the barrel with Good Stuff expanding foam from Home Depot. Seems to be a bit more consistent than the floppy free float. Remains to be seen what effect cold winter weather will have on the foam bedding though. Epoxy bedding would have added more weight and I was curious how the foam would work out.


Last edited by carbon12; 10/07/15.
IC B3

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
D
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
I've not had good luck with conventional bedding material sticking to Tupperware.

Let us know how your bedding works.

The way Ruger designed the hook up, I'm not sure bedding will do anything for the action. The floppy forearm is another matter, but may not affect much. I'm not sure. RAR's seem pretty accurate right out of the box.

DF

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
I snipped two coils and polished the sear it will easily brake at 1#. I turned the screw in three turns and am very happy at 1 1/2 #s. I could easily turn it back up to 4# thanks for the info this will make a very accurate rifle even better.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,999
C
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
C
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,999
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
I've not had good luck with conventional bedding material sticking to Tupperware.

Let us know how your bedding works.

The way Ruger designed the hook up, I'm not sure bedding will do anything for the action. The floppy forearm is another matter, but may not affect much. I'm not sure. RAR's seem pretty accurate right out of the box.

DF


The foam bedding in the fore end seems to reduce the few unexplained flyers that I was getting. Don't know for sure since I have shot the rifle less than 100 times (still have a few bullets left in the once full box of Scenars) since adding the foam. The idea was not to stiffen the fore end but to make the contact between the fore end and barrel consistent with as little induced stress as possible. I don't use a bipod with the RAR so don't know how one would affect consistency. Experiment is still ongoing.

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
I don't have an RAR.

If someone needs a low cost, high quality rifle, the RAR is a great choice.

I think Ruger knocked this one out of the park.

DF


I like the Marlin X guns better than the RARs, but they are no longer in production and that has left a weak market niche for the RARs to exploit. The RAR-Predators that I have shot are all accurate, but I can see them becoming money pits if you swap the trigger to a Timney and the stock to a Boyds. I put Boyds Heritage laminated stocks on RAR-Ps in 223, 243, and 6.5 Creed, but the price for a stiffer stock was an added pound of weight, from 8lbs. to 9lbs. out the door.

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
D
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
Originally Posted by carbon12
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
I've not had good luck with conventional bedding material sticking to Tupperware.

Let us know how your bedding works.

The way Ruger designed the hook up, I'm not sure bedding will do anything for the action. The floppy forearm is another matter, but may not affect much. I'm not sure. RAR's seem pretty accurate right out of the box.

DF


The foam bedding in the fore end seems to reduce the few unexplained flyers that I was getting. Don't know for sure since I have shot the rifle less than 100 times (still have a few bullets left in the once full box of Scenars) since adding the foam. The idea was not to stiffen the fore end but to make the contact between the fore end and barrel consistent with as little induced stress as possible. I don't use a bipod with the RAR so don't know how one would affect consistency. Experiment is still ongoing.


I don't think a bipod would be a good idea with that stock. Would like to hear from anyone who's tried one.

DF

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
D
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,080
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
I don't have an RAR.

If someone needs a low cost, high quality rifle, the RAR is a great choice.

I think Ruger knocked this one out of the park.

DF


I like the Marlin X guns better than the RARs, but they are no longer in production and that has left a weak market niche for the RARs to exploit. The RAR-Predators that I have shot are all accurate, but I can see them becoming money pits if you swap the trigger to a Timney and the stock to a Boyds. I put Boyds Heritage laminated stocks on RAR-Ps in 223, 243, and 6.5 Creed, but the price for a stiffer stock was an added pound of weight, from 8lbs. to 9lbs. out the door.

How does the Thompson Center version compare?

DF

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Y
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Y
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by carbon12
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
I've not had good luck with conventional bedding material sticking to Tupperware.

Let us know how your bedding works.

The way Ruger designed the hook up, I'm not sure bedding will do anything for the action. The floppy forearm is another matter, but may not affect much. I'm not sure. RAR's seem pretty accurate right out of the box.

DF


The foam bedding in the fore end seems to reduce the few unexplained flyers that I was getting. Don't know for sure since I have shot the rifle less than 100 times (still have a few bullets left in the once full box of Scenars) since adding the foam. The idea was not to stiffen the fore end but to make the contact between the fore end and barrel consistent with as little induced stress as possible. I don't use a bipod with the RAR so don't know how one would affect consistency. Experiment is still ongoing.


I don't think a bipod would be a good idea with that stock. Would like to hear from anyone who's tried one.

DF


I use a bipod with mine sometimes, but opened up the barrel channel generously when I got it. Mine is also the newer stock with the X reinforcements in the forend, so it doesn't flex as much. No issues so far with or without a bipod. I haven't shot it as much as I'd like either though.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 886
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 886
I have done a few Ruger American triggers and have found them very similar to the Ruger MKII how they work. As such I have found that the sear engagement angle has the most affect on the trigger pull weight and feel. You can run it without the spring and it will only go so light. I have a jig for changing the angle and going towards neutral I can get the weight as low as one pound and still use the factory spring. Shortening the spring is not always indicated because if the pull is aborted the spring and positive angle will return the engagement to 100 percent. I recut the angle for the pressure I want, then adjust the sear engagement using a dial indicator to between .007" and .014" depending on the intended use of the rifle and the experience level of the shooter. The surface finish must be very smooth and consistent to eliminate the creep feel. This is near impossible to do freehand. I can only get it with super fine stones. A Foredom/dremel or buffer will wreck one of these in a quick second. My next investment for trigger work will be a stereo microscope with a hook up for a big screen monitor for doing these. Head band magnifiers just don't offer the resolution a guy really needs to do a first rate job on a sear.



"Hired Gun" Quickest and fastest all motor sand car on the planet.
3.008 at 104.8 300' of sand.

NRA Patron Life Member, Gunsmith, Instructor, Chief RSO
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
I don't have an RAR.

If someone needs a low cost, high quality rifle, the RAR is a great choice.

I think Ruger knocked this one out of the park.

DF


I like the Marlin X guns better than the RARs, but they are no longer in production and that has left a weak market niche for the RARs to exploit. The RAR-Predators that I have shot are all accurate, but I can see them becoming money pits if you swap the trigger to a Timney and the stock to a Boyds. I put Boyds Heritage laminated stocks on RAR-Ps in 223, 243, and 6.5 Creed, but the price for a stiffer stock was an added pound of weight, from 8lbs. to 9lbs. out the door.

How does the Thompson Center version compare?

DF


The only T-C that I own is a 1970s vintage .54 caliber Hawkins.

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,080
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,080
A few comments:

As Yondering mentioned, the newer RAR stocks have much stiffer forends, and so far most I have seen don't even require any rasp work to keep them truly free-floating, unlike the original stock.

In my experience, if the barrel is truly free-floated (whether in the older stock or newer) there aren't any "fliers" with good ammo. An example is my stainless .243, which will keep 10 shots (not 3 or 5) at 100 under an inch with handloads using 105 Berger Hunting VLD's. Dunno why anybody would go to all the trouble of stiffening and bedding the forend when it's so simple and quick to modify them slightly to be really free-floated.

The stock triggers will normally adjust down to 2.75 to 3.25 pounds, but if you lighten the return spring a little they will go around 2 pounds. Some people may not like the pull itself but I've shot a bunch of RAR's at varmints, big game, paper and steel (the steel out to 1000 yards) and haven't had any problems. A friend's 6.5 Creedmoor outshoots his expensive custom 6.5 Creedmoor silhouette rifle with the trigger modified exactly the way mentioned above in competition.

The T/C Venture is another good one. I have a Compact (20" barrel) in .308 that's as accurate as an RAR, but with a more adjustable trigger and stiffer stock. It's also heavier: Mine weighs 8 pounds 2 ounces scoped, while my RAR standard weighs exactly 7 poounds, but to be fair 5 of those extra ounces on the Venture Compact come from its 3-9x42 Zeiss Terra, while the RAR has a 6x38 Weaver. (Rings on both are Weavers.) The T/C costs around $100 more.

It always baffles me when people buy a cheap rifle that shoots very accurately with a decent (if not spectacular) trigger pull, then spend a bunch of money and/or time to somehow make it "better." But it's free country.


β€œMontana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

551 members (1234, 11point, 2500HD, 160user, 10ring1, 219 Wasp, 70 invisible), 2,973 guests, and 1,215 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,335
Posts18,468,659
Members73,928
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.128s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9004 MB (Peak: 1.0576 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 19:11:00 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS