|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,736
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,736 |
What is the typical reduction in charge when going from Remington brass to LC? Been using 26-26.5 grains of Benchmark with 50gr Vmax for 3350
But as for me and my house we will serve the Lord. Joshua 24:15 I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. Phil. 4:13
I DON'T NEED A WSM AS I HAVE A WEATHERBY!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,949
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,949 |
In .223, they are very similar in case capacity. I load them the same.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,017
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,017 |
Ditto on what antelope sniper said. I will say that the LC I had wasn't as good as the R-P. I sold all of my LC and only shoot R-P now... YMMV...
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,949
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,949 |
Ditto on what antelope sniper said. I will say that the LC I had wasn't as good as the R-P. I sold all of my LC and only shoot R-P now... YMMV... I am also standardizing around R-P brass in the .223. All the LC ect goes into the "plinking" box.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 692
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 692 |
LC 5.56 brass is lighter than R-P .223 Rem brass.
Random sample of 10 each.
R-P 93.8 96 94.8 95.6 89.4 94.2 96.4 94 94.8 94.8 943.8 AVE 94.38
LC 92.2 92.8 94.2 93 92.8 93 94.2 93 92 92.4 929.6 AVE 92.96
I like LC brass, once you get past the primer pocket reaming/swaging.
Michael
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,949
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,949 |
LC 5.56 brass is lighter than R-P .223 Rem brass.
Random sample of 10 each.
R-P 93.8 96 94.8 95.6 89.4 94.2 96.4 94 94.8 94.8 943.8 AVE 94.38
LC 92.2 92.8 94.2 93 92.8 93 94.2 93 92 92.4 929.6 AVE 92.96
I like LC brass, once you get past the primer pocket reaming/swaging.
Michael
The difference in water capacity is even smaller. Not large enough to make a difference.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,086
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,086 |
I use quite a bit of military case's but only with cast loads. I have tried military case's for 30-06, 308, 280, 243 and 223. The only military case's that I got anywhere near the accuracy out of were Lake City Match and they shoot very well. But any more for jacket bullet loads I use Remington or Winchester.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,736
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,736 |
Thanks guys. It is .223.
Glad I asked as I was going to reduce by 1/2 grain. Was...
But as for me and my house we will serve the Lord. Joshua 24:15 I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. Phil. 4:13
I DON'T NEED A WSM AS I HAVE A WEATHERBY!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,425
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,425 |
You still should do a workup.
Weigh 10 RPs and 10 LC's (deprimed just for insurance) and see what the aggregate weight is.
I really like Lake City, once the primer pocket issue is handled they are very good brass. Weigh-sorted LC brass with the usual detailed prep gives me brass that shoots better than I can.
Up hills slow, Down hills fast Tonnage first and Safety last.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 378
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 378 |
Unless you know the metallurgy behind the brass, weight of the case doesn't tell you capacity. Volume and mass are different things. This chart has been around for a while now.
I'm a firm believer in the theory of " If it bleeds, I can kill it".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,730
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,730 |
I shoot mine out of bolt actions, not ARs...
but I've not had issues with Lake City, Federal, Winchester or Remington... and a host of other foreign brass.. pick it up as range brass.. keep it sorted so each batch is the same manufacture...
keep load records on 3 x 5 cards within, in a zip lock bag...
got batches that have gone 20, 30 and 40 reloads...and still going strong...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755 |
Unless you know the metallurgy behind the brass, weight of the case doesn't tell you capacity. Volume and mass are different things. OK, can you show some examples where density of the brass varies enough to matter? Show us that it's metallurgy/density, not different external brass dimensions.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,949
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,949 |
Unless you know the metallurgy behind the brass, weight of the case doesn't tell you capacity. Volume and mass are different things. OK, can you show some examples where density of the brass varies enough to matter? Show us that it's metallurgy/density, not different external brass dimensions. Darkker is the king of worrying about things that don't matter in the real world.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,233
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,233 |
I have to chuckle a little when the subject of different kinds of brass is once more brought up. I ended that dilemma for myself when I invested in two thousand pieces of once fired LC brass all of the same year mfg. After going through the sizing with a small base die, trimming, and decrimping, I just build my load around this brass without having to worry about capacities etc. After shooting, the spent rounds are cleaned and dumped into the box while I grab a fresh bunch out of another box. I don't even bother with picking up range brass anymore,, I don't have any use for it. All this small based sized brass is only loaded for my ARs. My 223 bolt actions get the Win. nickel plated brass.
I could wish a lot of things on my worst enemy but neuropathy ain't one of them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 671
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 671 |
My personal quest for accuracy, has taken me down the road to selecting cases by experience. Some time ago, I got rid of all commercial brass because of the inconsistant results.
I got LC brass, once fired, and went thru the work to prepare it for loading. It all comes down to accuracy. I found so much variation in weight with commercial brass.
As some have posted here, the commercial brass seems to come out with brass that is soft and then another batch that is correct. I simply do not want the variations so I use LC brass in the 223 and 20 TAC. For a casual shooter, I doubt it makes much difference, but for accuracy, it pays to be picky.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,130
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,130 |
I just bought a bunch of this stuff, it's stacked up beside my loading bench: http://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/product/productId/19570Which is, in my opinion, the very best brass made - period, bar none. It is the Methuselah of brass. Lasts until the sun dies, unless it's fired in a rifle with a chamber looser than a farmhouse screen door. Or, if the nut behind the trigger absolutely wants a mil-spec headstamp to complement that mall ninja SWAT vest, then there's this stuff: http://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/product/productId/28474 It's brand new, it's completely cool, undinged, no grit, no grime, never been fired in Herman the drunken explosive demolition expert's AR with maximum headspace. Down side is the cost depletes one's savings stash for tattoos and beer. I bought 500 cases as a lark; you can never have too much brass. This stuff is completely comparable to that stuff above: http://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/product/productId/12628Which I shot really good groups with, excruciatingly good groups that looked like somebody stuck a 16 penny nail through the target. Then if you want some more space-age sounding brass, this stuff will do just fine. Guess who they manufacturer brass for? http://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/product/productId/30863Now here's the thing. In my opinion, all that case capacity and weight stuff isn't worth a hanky full of pig snot. It'll all boils down to barrel quality, the twist rate, and most importantly the shooter, then the environmental conditions. It'll all shoot about the same, depending on what powder you select, the primer (that's a big factor) and what bullet is being shot. Here's two groups I have shown before, same rifle and barrel, same load, only different primers. So buy up that new brass while it's available, because I feel a new order coming on.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,425
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,425 |
Wow, what a diff. Now you have me thinking paranoid thoughts about my 205Ms. I hate you.
Up hills slow, Down hills fast Tonnage first and Safety last.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 378
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 378 |
Unless you know the metallurgy behind the brass, weight of the case doesn't tell you capacity. Volume and mass are different things. OK, can you show some examples where density of the brass varies enough to matter? Show us that it's metallurgy/density, not different external brass dimensions. Darkker is the king of worrying about things that don't matter in the real world. While Antelope may well be correct about this, the point was that the machines that make the case are different, with different specs and tollerances; as well as the metalurgy. See here for your example of metalurgy: http://www.accurateshooter.com/technical-articles/x-ray-spectrometry-of-cartridge-brass/So if you want volume measure the volume, not the weight. But I agree, I have never seggregated cases.
Last edited by Darkker; 12/01/15.
I'm a firm believer in the theory of " If it bleeds, I can kill it".
|
|
|
|
72 members (Algotguns, 21, 808outdoors, 1973cb450, ATC, 8 invisible),
1,420
guests, and
743
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,280
Posts18,467,675
Members73,928
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|