Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Abortion subject/devil's advocate

In the face of human obstinence, even God relented on divorce. That still didn't make it right. So, what was your point?

Thanks for the citation, A_S.

Have you ever noticed that Preachers almost never talk about Mathew 19 verses 8,and 9 were Jesus says Moses was right,you can divorce your wife,but if you do for any reason other than adultry,then if you,or her gets remarried then it's adultry..If they did then it would bring a few holier than thou people down a peg...

I've mulled the whole thing over in my mind for a while, and I really can't see a perfect solution that would work. Glad I don't have to make the decision for others.

Levitt is about the furthest think you can get from a Marxist Commie. He's a free market advocate that studies at Chicago while Milton Friedman was department chair.

Have you ever noticed that Preachers almost never talk about Mathew 19 verses 8,and 9 were Jesus says Moses was right,you can divorce your wife,but if you do for any reason other than adultry,then if you,or her gets remarried then it's adultry..If they did then it would bring a few holier than thou people down a peg... [/quote
Right there plain as day, Read it several times

Personally, I feel it's a very sick mind that can justify killing a child.

rost495,



I usually like your posts, so want to understand what you are saying here. Are you saying if your wife is pregnant and something goes wrong, you would not try to save her even if it meant loosing the baby?

the folks who post on this site knows for a fact is what is our most personal opinion, and set in concrete.

in other words, please take a position and then set it in concrete.

feel better now?

the truth is ephemeral. what?

for an old line follower of the mighty War God YHWH, the soul enters the physical body at the first breath of LIFE.

i guess interpretations vary. and so they should.

Gus, don't confuse them with facts from their own holy book. There are also specific passages that endorse abortion, but that would just make their heads explode.

ok, fair enough. so, just why did humans choose to bow down to the monkey/biological imperative to enjoin the females and males? because they felt like they had to, perhaps?

or was the payoff worthy of the risk? humans, breeding with humans, and when is enough, truly enough? anyone know for sure?

humans running the earth. what a concept.

we've got some 19 billion of dollars in debt to der chinese and others, in various amounts.

if the earth housed 19 billion humans instead of the current 9 or 7 billion eaters, so what's the problem? anyone know for sure?

just how much output can this earth produce under the radience of the sun, and how should it be divided, allocated, or distributed? anyone know for sure?

Gus,

When you talk about dividing and distributing, you are going down a real [bleep] commie road. Are you a Communist Marxist?

well, uh, no. but on the other hand, there's tons of folks who travel with us, for better or worse.

to further state, we've strayed off the main road, into the commie/socialist road long long ago. and no one ever bothered to lift a finger. ya know?

why can't we start at the base line zero point, and move forward from there? we've got the Earth, it's ability to produce annual and multi-year production. we humans have the ability to process the annual production, mine gold, silver, oil, etc. and fish in the ocean for protein.

anything else? does anybody know for sure?

Gus, what do you mean by "begin at a base line zero point".

Are you saying I have to give up everything and hope the collective decides to give me back more then what they took from me so we could get to your "baseline point", or are you advocating that we wipe the existing laws from the books and start over?

If you are suggestion zero base budgeting, I'm all for making every government agency justify every dollar of spending over zero every year.

I'll disagree. I don't think the urban breeders ever cared about abortion. Assuming urban children are crime-prone, I don't think abortion has reduced crime.

Here's the paper where it was first published:

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2696468?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Gentlemen,



Please document with chapter and verses. While you're at it, please leave out explanations.

Anyone need a definition for irony???

I'll take the documented facts over that attempt at a thought.