|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 332
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 332 |
Lazi,
If you decide against it, I'll take it off your hands.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 98
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 98 |
I don't get the 1x deal either, 2x is as low as I want to go with anything. if its that close that 2x is too much, you should not be aiming anyways rather just point. Another gem. In my case the buck froze up in some brush facing me. He literally he literally was walking right to me until I raised my rifle to eye level. At best I had a silhouette through the brush when he was moving. When he stopped I probably could've made out his face and neck with irons or with a 1x or 2x scope. At 4x I maybe saw an eye but with the sun bouncing off the brush it all blended in. So no quite a point and shoot situation. Maybe it just wasn't meant to be but I figure one of two things would help me if it should ever happen again. I just ruled out a 1x-4x on that particular rifle. My next option is to carry a capable pistol I can transition to should I find myself eye to eye with another big boy in the brush.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 98
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 98 |
Lazi,
If you decide against it, I'll take it off your hands. Right on. I'm going to consider it for several other rifles but if it doesn't fit those I will probably let it go. I will let you know. Thanks,
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,691
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,691 |
Unless you are a Leupold hater, the little 2.5 should be a good fit to the 527 7.62X39. Otherwise, perhaps a red dot.
"Do not blame Caesar, blame the people...who have...rejoiced in their loss of freedom....Blame the people who hail him when he speaks of the 'new, wonderful, good, society'...to mean ,..living fatly at the expense of the industrious." Cicero
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
Unless you are a Leupold hater, the little 2.5 should be a good fit to the 527 7.62X39. Otherwise, perhaps a red dot. This was my thought also. The heavy duplex in a 2.5 is great for close shots. If you need more versatility the VX2 2-7 would also be great on that rifle. I've used one in close situations for years. I've killed dozens of deer with it on 2X
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556 |
I don't get the 1x. It takes 1.5 to be the same as a human eye. ? "1x" by definition is unmagnified. Look through a 1x and then out. It is actually smaller than your vision. We used to only be able to use 1x on a muzzle loader. They are bad. It was very difficult to see anything through them very well unless it was real close. 1x means no magnification-yes. It does not work that way with a scope, though. 1.5 makes it the same as if you were looking at it with your eye. 1x is actually smaller. A 2-6x would make way more sense to me, but that is just my opinion.
You did not "seen" anything, you "saw" it. A "creek" has water in it, a "crick" is what you get in your neck. Liberals with guns are nothing but hypocrites.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,395
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,395 |
Look through a 1x and then out. It is actually smaller than your vision. We used to only be able to use 1x on a muzzle loader. They are bad. It was very difficult to see anything through them very well unless it was real close.
1x means no magnification-yes. It does not work that way with a scope, though. 1.5 makes it the same as if you were looking at it with your eye. 1x is actually smaller.
It's called diopter adjustment... Which will change apparent magnification. If you're using a decent 1x scope and it looks smaller through the optic, adjust the diopter. 1.5x does not make it look the same as an unaided eye, nor close.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,411
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,411 |
Hmmm. So you're claiming that, specifically with riflescopes, 1X is 1X and not 1.5X? A bit off topic but what about with binoculars, like my 6X Yosemites. Is it like this: 6x1.5x2=18X or 6x1x2=12X?
"I can't be canceled, because, I don't give a fuuck!" --- Kid Rock 2022
Holocaust Deniers, the ultimate perverted dipchits: Bristoe, TheRealHawkeye, stophel, Ghostinthemachine, anyone else?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453 |
I've never heard of a human who has eyesight that magnifies objects by a rate of 1.5X unless they have successfully had an eye transplant with a Raptor.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,453
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,453 |
Learn something new everyday.
|
|
|
|
596 members (007FJ, 10Glocks, 1234, 10ring1, 10gaugemag, 19rabbit52, 51 invisible),
2,280
guests, and
1,195
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,090
Posts18,464,038
Members73,923
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|