Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Hillary Clinton’s most repugnant lie

Hillary's entire agenda and political philosophy is a lie so its' hard to tell when she does tell the truth. She has no credibility. I'm not going to depend some agency like Fact Checker to tell me who to trust.

If Trump is telling tall tales, at least he didn't hold public office at the time. But you're not smart enough to make those distinctions.

I can't consider any public official who accepted money (millions) for influence peddling while holding the office of Secretary of State as "honest". She should be indicted instead of being a contender for the presidency. But this country is so warped today I doubt that will happen.

She is a power hungry,washed up leftover from the 60's.lies habitually,and if she is the best that the Democratic Party can offer as a presidential candidate we are in worse shape than I thought.

You seem to revel in being an overeducated, pompous ass,and frankly, considering your level of education and affluence,the depths of your stupidity are hard to fathom. You depend on Fact Checker to help you conclude who's lying? Not smart enough to make these decisions for your self? Hilarious.

Paddler, trust me...it doesn't suck to be me.

I do just fine and don;t take a dime from insurance companies to do it.

You may be right about the election. I don't make those predictions anymore because after watching this country head into the toilet at the hands of the "leaders" you support,nothing surprises me anymore. I can't look at the track record of the boobs you support and say they have done a good job.

And it's getting worse. Too many examples to cite.


Only time will tell on the election though, right?If she's elected, you can count on a continual slide into oblivion. She and that crook she's married to will amass more money from foreign governments,and continue to lie about it while they use the office as a cesspool of corruption.

I think you'd like that. You seem to condone that behavior on her part, or choose not to talk about it. Wonder why?

When are you gonna grow up and do some real hunting,anyway?

Paddler:

Obama did not save us from anything except averting a financial disaster which had, at its roots, a failed Democratic agenda of forcing banks to give very bad loans to people who could not afford them.

Paddler:

Your problem in supporting the Democratic Party (as currently comprised) is that it subscribes to a failed socio/economic/political philosophy that chronically fails to deliver what it promises. History is rife with examples. You cannot point to a single socialist country that is truly prosperous, is not upside down financially,and does not attempt in some fashion to tax or regulate its citizens into stifling oblivion.

They are all, by any objective standards, failures.

Take a look at China,most of Europe, Cuba, Venezuela...the list is endless.


The only nation that has prospered in the history of mankind, and created the level of wealth, prosperity and upward financial mobility unequaled by any society in the history of mankind is....right here. To the extent that ANY of this has been stifled, or moved us into second tier worldwide in any category, is because of the intervention of a central government, run by stooges who seek to punish success.



Ever wonder why so many really sick Arab leaders have ended up at Mass General Hospital when seriously ill? You're in the business....you tell me. A free enterprise system and capitalism, along with a unique form of governance (the Constitution)have made us the best, most prosperous and freest nation in the history of the planet. Most all Democratic platforms are designed to tear it all done, but many are not bright enough to understand that,

As to those hateful Republicans I think you better take a look at the thread started here pointing out that the USC gives the president wide latitude in excluding classes of people from immigrating here if he deems them a threat to the security of the nation. Jimmy Carter used it with regard to Iranians.

People like you who are emotional and irrational ignore what has been codified into law and scream at people accusing them of being racists, Islamophobes, and ignore what is codified as the "law of the land". Sort of inconvenient for you guys, I know but it is what it is. Nobody said maintaining our national security was going to be "fair" to citizens of other countries.

So what Trump said is not hateful, nor racist, but the discretion to make that call resides in the president and is codified in our laws.

Obama did not save us from anything except averting a financial disaster which had, at its roots, a failed Democratic agenda of forcing banks to give very bad loans to people who could not afford them.

Once again there's that Democratic intrusion into the private sector under the mistaken assumption that every American is "entitled" to a home. Guess what? You aren't entitled to anything....you earn it. Unless you're a Democrat who feels that everyone is entitled to everything.Anyway, that scheme began under Bill Clinton, your gal's husband. Look what happened and yet you think they are heroes. They are the ones responsible for bringing everything down....connect the dots.


Obamas stimulus packages did not nothing but shovel money to public sector unions and workers. It did the private sector no good, but the system is so screwed up by government intrusion that the Feds have been printing money for years now to shore up the stock market and Wall Street. You people have created a mess; a house of cards that will tumble eventually.

Of course bird hunting is real hunting. I feel the same way about you bird hunters who strut around with $40k shotguns, as I do about dry fly purists.....

I could go on....you're wasting my time.

Hey, Bobby, I asked you a question.

While you're at it, also tell me about Hillary's "accomplishments", that qualify her to be president. C'mon...convince me.

Hi Bobby,

You ask why I support Democrats? Simply because they're better than the hate-spewing Republicans in every way. Obama has rescued us from the worst recession since the Great Depression. His legacy will be incredible, in contrast to the Bush years and what would have happened if Romney had been elected.

I don't understand how anybody can support Trump or any other Republican. Here's an editorial from the real Post, the one in Washington:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...8-a8f4-11e5-bff5-905b92f5f94b_story.html

So, what do you consider "real" hunting, Bobby? Just curious.

On "Justice," Judge Jeanine Pirro reacted to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's newly unveiled homeland security plan.

Pirro said that Clinton poses a greater danger to national security than the head of a terrorist cell.

She criticized Clinton for saying we need to defeat offshoots of al-Qaeda after refusing, as head of the State Department, to label Boko Haram -- the Nigeria-based Islamic group that captured hundreds of schoolgirls in 2014 -- a terrorist organization.

Pirro cited reports of Clinton's "relationship with a Nigerian land developer who gave your family's foundation 5 million dollars."

"And we should trust you? With the presidency of the United States?"

Pirro also criticized Clinton for saying "we can't afford another major ground war in the Middle East" after spearheading a mission to topple Libyan dictator Moammar Gaddafi.

"You instigated a good deal of what you and others call the Arab spring, which has turned out to be a nightmare for millions of Arabs who've been slaughtered."

Pirro said Clinton's new plan amounts to "shallow slogans" after failing to make a difference as Secretary of State before ISIS became the most powerful terror organization in history.

Watch Judge Jeanine's opening statement above and read the full transcript below.

And tell her what you think on her Facebook page or on Twitter @JudgeJeanine!

Judge Jeanine: Mr. President, Let FBI Director James Comey Do His Job

'It's About Surviving': Judge Jeanine Says U.S. Must 'Stop Pussyfooting' in Terror Fight

Who do you think poses the greatest danger to the safety of the United States? To your safety and that of your family?

That person is not a career criminal, not the head of a terrorist cell, not even your run of the mill thug. That person is a woman who will do anything to get elected.

I wasn't even going to do an open this evening because it's the holiday. For me--Christmas--and I’m generally in the Christmas spirit. But this week when Hillary Clinton laid out her comprehensive plan to bolster homeland security, I couldn't help myself - take a listen.

“Because it's not enough to contain ISIS. We need to defeat ISIS. Break its momentum and then its back. And not just ISIS. But the broader radical jihadist movement. Including al Qaida and offshoots like al Shabab in Somalia.”

Defeat not just ISIS? And offshoots like al Shabab?

So you tell me Hillary. Why, when you were in power, in charge of the State Department did you refuse to label Boko Haram a terrorist organization?

You remember them? They kidnapped hundreds of girls and that hashtag "bring back our girls.” Aren't you the self-described champion of women’s' rights?

And just recently, Boko Haram--that non-terrorist group to you--literally obliterated the Nigerian town of Baga reportedly killing 2,000 innocent citizens.

In 2010 you were presented with hard evidence of their terrorism. But no, your State Department, even after Boko Haram bombed a UN headquarters, pushed back against the CIA and the FBI who wanted them designated a terrorist organization. Thanks to you, since that time they have morphed into an even greater terror threat strapping explosives on little girls using them as suicide bombers.

So why? Why not designate them a terrorist organization? Reports are that you wouldn't designate Boko Haram even though you knew of their atrocities because of your relationship with a Nigerian land developer who gave your family's foundation 5 million dollars. And we should trust you? With the presidency of the United States?

Also in your plan to protect the homeland you say:

“We can’t afford another major ground war in the Middle East. That's exactly what ISIS wants from us.”

Really? Aren't you the one who spearheaded a mission to topple Moammar Gaddafi claiming that there was a threat that he might kill his own people?

You even order that the Pentagon take no calls from Gaddafi's son, Saif, who wanted to engage in talks to stop the mission. The truth? You instigated a good deal of what you and others call the Arab spring, which has turned out to be a nightmare for millions of Arabs who've been slaughtered.

So why Hillary? Why? Because you wanted to be a leader who could normalize Libya. It was so normalized that our ambassador and three other Americans were massacred in its capital--the first death of an ambassador in almost 40 years.

And you say you want to defeat ISIS by dismantling the global network of terror that supplies radical jihadists with money, arms and fighters. Aren't you the one who reportedly funneled arms from Libya to Turkey into Syria? Those same arms now being used against us?

And you want to intensify support for local forces who can pursue them on the ground? How are you going to do that when 500 million dollars of our money was spent to support local forces, who dropped their guns, their weapons and their drawers when they saw ISIS coming? Some plan, Hillary.

In summation you say we can defeat ISIS by smashing its stronghold, hitting its fighters, leaders and infrastructures from the air, and intensifying support for local forces, who can pursue them on the ground. That's a lot of talk from the woman who was in charge of our strategy in the State Department, and who could've made a difference before ISIS became the most powerful richest terror organization in history. But then again, you're the one who said:

“Shallow slogans don't add up to a strategy.”

And your shallow slogans don't add up to a presidency either.

And that's my open.

You talking to me? You think I'm waiting around to answer questions from a retard like you?

Kidding right? What do I care if you asked me a question?

You're lucky I'm even talking to you at all...LOL!

Name all these Obama accomplishments.Please be specific.

While you're at it, also tell me about Hillary's "accomplishments", that qualify her to be president. C'mon...convince me.


If you're lucky, I might respond to your vitriolic posts in the future. Otherwise, GFY.

"Arrogant....... pompous......... ass. Not really all that bright either.....Mmmm....huge ego. Be easy under oath.Be tripping all over himself in no time. Clings to opinions despite the facts.They're the best ...", I said to myself.


As to the hunting, birds are a quaint pass time.Fun. I've hunted pheasants, sharp tails, Huns,and ruffed grouse in the west and Alberta. Mallards ,too. It was VERY easy.Fun,entertaining, but EASY. Anyone could do it.....

Here's a hint....the only "smart" ruffed grouse are east of the Mississippi.Most notably New England...where ruffed grouse hunting started. Doubt you could find and hit one...even with a $40k shotgun. But I bet you never gunned them back here?