|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552 |
I have a contact at SHOT right now that just swung by the Nightforce booth and toyed with one a second time at my request. Says it's a typical NF and everything looks and feels solid.
Lots of features in this scope for an MSRP of $1250 I think. ZeroSet, illum, FFP and MOAR reticle.
I strongly feel I will be investing in this scope. Rumors are they're available now.
Only thing I did not like was the specs state 2.7-3.1" of eye relief. Seemed incredibly shallow or short to me? Anyone see a real life issue with this?
Money IS an object to me. I simply can't swing for a Schmidt and Bender, or a Swarovski, etc. Even the NXS is a bit of a stretch at $1950
Think I'd feel better with the above than the Burris XTR II. No 34mm tube.
Please God, give me some good tags this year....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,904
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,904 |
A friend bought one recently and I've put some time behind it. Nothing not to like except the price. The eye relief is adequate for me, like other NF scopes it is heavy. Clarity is good and the repeatability has been spot on so far. I have no experience with the Burris.
Golden............
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552 |
The brand new Front Focal plane F1? I don't think they're available to purchase yet...
Please God, give me some good tags this year....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,351
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,351 |
Yep, Whittakers has them. The eye relief has me sitting on the fence still. That and another excellent range session today with 5 different SWFA scopes has me wondering why I need to spend more than $300 again....
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 890
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 890 |
I believe Europtic has them as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552 |
My bad. So is 3" enough for 260/243 type rifles?
The other SHV scopes are 3.5" relief I think. I compared them and the SFP are more forgiving. I honestly don't know what is enough from experience. They either suck or they don't. I can't help but think NF would put out only a solid product.
Please God, give me some good tags this year....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,930
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,930 |
How do this compare to the NXS F1 line such as the 3.5-15x50? I'm curious as to glass comparison and tracking.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,086
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,086 |
3" is good enough for a 22 rimfire; nothing else.
NRA Benefactor Member
Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552 |
Called NF....scope is available for purchase and they did confirm that wasn't a typo. 2.8" to 3.1". I had a contact at SHOT. He mounted the scope up and handled it for a bit. He's a very accomplished LR shooter and didn't notice an issue with it at all.
Hmmmm
Please God, give me some good tags this year....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527 |
If its truly 3", that is really short in my opinion. Good for an AR, but thats about it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,586
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,586 |
To pucking funny 3 inches for a 260. No problem except for the puzz ies on the site
Never take life to seriously, after all ,no one gets out of it alive.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,767
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,767 |
Just got finished shooting one on a 7mag
POS
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,995
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,995 |
Just got finished shooting one on a 7mag
POS What was the problem with the scope? Personally I’m in the market for a nsx 2-10x42 but have considered the SHV.
When people face the possibility of freezing or starving there is little chance they are going to listen to unfounded claims of climate doomsday from a bunch of ultra-rich yacht sailing private jet-setting carbon-spewing hypocrite elites
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,082
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,082 |
Just got finished shooting one on a 7mag
POS I too am curious as to what you don't like about it. Was thinking of one for an AR. Have only looked at pictures of them on NF website. The way they are priced I realize they're not going to be close to what my BEAST is , but for an AR, wouldn't they work?
NRA Patron Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527 |
There isn't a leupold made other than the Mark 8 that can hang with nightforce...and they are $5000, lol!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552 |
The other one in my price w my preferred features is the Vortex Razor HD 5-20.
Not in stock till July tho
Please God, give me some good tags this year....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498 |
I've had the SHV F1 for almost 2 months now... Solid scope that works like it should...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,575
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,575 |
I called NF and asked about the differences in SHV and NXS. They were very clear that if you intend to crank knobs, you need to step up to the NXS line. They turrets are not the same.
That was before the F1 new model, but I would assume they're the same given the price point.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,767
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,767 |
Just got finished shooting one on a 7mag
POS What was the problem with the scope? Personally I’m in the market for a nsx 2-10x42 but have considered the SHV. I should have specified that the scope I used was the 5-20 model. Maybe the 4-14 is better. The eye box was very unforgiving. A bit difficult to find the exact spot your eye HAD to be to get a sight picture. If you move even a skosh, you lose the entire picture. Glass basically sucked. I realize this is a bottom-of-the-line Nightforce and that may be a place where they cut some cost. The reticle was too thick for my liking. From the Nightforce website, I'm guessing it was the MOAR reticle, but can't really decipher it on the website; the pictures of the reticles aren't the greatest. This scope may have been an earlier model with a slightly different reticle. As far as the scope's functioning, I don't know. I was simply shooting 100 yard groups to test ammo and barrel quality. I would spend the extra money and get an NXS.
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498 |
I doubt NF would put an exposed turret on a scope and not mean for it to be used...
I've 500+ rounds under the SHV F1 and every single round I've run the turret.... It's been on 3 different rifles and on each rifle I've run a tall target test... I've purposely run the turret up to 10+ mils and back to zero to test the longevity of the turret and its ability to RTZ... Thus far not a single problem...
On the 3-10x42 SHV's I've used the elevation turret extensively as well with no problems in tracking and RTZ... The 4-14x56 and the 5-20x56 SHVs I've done the same but not to the extent as the F1 and the 3-10x42s and have had no problems with them either....
The F1 appears to be a great choice for a guy who doesn't want to shell out the additional expense for a FFP NXS or to put together a PRS match rifle in the production class...
For those that are concerned with eye relief, I've not had a problem getting behind the scope and the eye box is fairly generous... A rifle should never move more than 1" during the recoil impulse and that includes the recoil pad compression... If your rifle does, then a guy needs to work on his shooting position and fundamentals verses worrying about eye relief on an optic...
YMMV....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552 |
Why the [bleep] would you add anything then? Save yourself the typing or simply say "NO I haven't...but I've shot the other SHV scopes and didn't care for it" Not the same scope. Schittt like this really pizzes me off.
"As far as the scope's functioning, I don't know. I was simply shooting 100 yard groups to test ammo and barrel quality."
Again....STFU
Last edited by Jesse Jaymes; 01/28/16.
Please God, give me some good tags this year....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,767
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,767 |
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,649
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,649 |
It has my interest, but I'm wondering where the additional 10oz come from. It's heavier than the NXS compacts and other SHV models my more than a little.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,281
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,281 |
I was disappointed in discovering the eye relief is so short. I did some measurements of my current scopes. The worst one I own is an older Burris 4-16. I once attempted to use it on a 7 Rem mag. On anything higher than 12X the eye relief was too short and it would often kiss my eye brow. It measures 3.25” of eye relief. That Burris is currently on a Ruger 10-22.
IMO short eye relief is only useful for 20 lb rifles with less than 10 ft/lb of recoil or a rimfire.
I called Nightforce and complained that the eye relief was too short. The guy talked down to me as if I had never fired a rifle. I told him it would hurt someone with a magnum. I said I intended to use it on a unbraked 8.5 lb 300 RUM. DennisinAz and I want to challenge those engineers to put that F1 on Dennis's 340 weatherby. We bet they wouldn’t shoot it more than once because they would be taken to an ER for stitches.
Last edited by Azshooter; 02/07/16.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,386
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,386 |
Yep, Whittakers has them. The eye relief has me sitting on the fence still. That and another excellent range session today with 5 different SWFA scopes has me wondering why I need to spend more than $300 again.... This
“Live free or die. Death is not the worst of evils.” - General John Stark.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,721
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,721 |
Why the [bleep] would you add anything then? Save yourself the typing or simply say "NO I haven't...but I've shot the other SHV scopes and didn't care for it" Not the same scope. Schittt like this really pizzes me off.
"As far as the scope's functioning, I don't know. I was simply shooting 100 yard groups to test ammo and barrel quality."
Again....STFU Thank you. It's this same ol stuff every time something gets discussed. If you don't have expierence with the subject let those talk that do and stay out of it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498 |
I was disappointed in discovering the eye relief is so short. I did some measurements of my current scopes. The worst one I own is an older Burris 4-16. I once attempted to use it on a 7 Rem mag. On anything higher than 12X the eye relief was too short and it would often kiss my eye brow. It measures 3.25” of eye relief. That Burris is currently on a Ruger 10-22.
IMO short eye relief is only useful for 20 lb rifles with less than 10 ft/lb of recoil or a rimfire.
I called Nightforce and complained that the eye relief was too short. The guy talked down to me as if I had never fired a rifle. I told him it would hurt someone with a magnum. I said I intended to use it on a unbraked 8.5 lb 300 RUM. DennisinAz and I want to challenge those engineers to put that F1 on Dennis's 340 weatherby. We bet they wouldn’t shoot it more than once because they would be taken to an ER for stitches. So in other words you have no clue about the scope and have never used one either... I'm sure NF has called a halt to the assembly line and the engineers are frantically at the design table re-engineering the F1 because two hicks in AZ don't know how to shoot... I will say it again... A rifle should never move more than 1" during the recoil impulse and that includes the recoil pad compression... If your rifle does, then you need to work on your shooting position, fundamentals and recoil management verses worrying about the eye relief on an optic... If its to much "gun" for you then you shouldn't be handling a weapon above your pay grade plain and simple... I was cleaning out my closet earlier today and underneath a box of 6" red heels, which I use on special occasions, I found a couple ammo cases holding 220 rounds of 338 RUM reloads with 300 SMK's... As to not let the ammo sit and go to waste I went out to the storage shed, found the old handy dandy 338 RUM barreled action, blew the dust offa it and threw it in a junk stock I had laying around... Mounted the SHV F1, used 3 rds to zero, dialed in/fired a rnd at 5, 10 and 15 mils on a tall target to verify tracking and then verified RTZ with a 7th round... Had 213 rds left so I hit a nearby canyon to go shoot rocks... I shot from every conceivable shooting position I could concoct (prone, sitting, kneeling, offhand, standing, tree/rock/cactus rests, uphill, downhill, extreme angle up/down from most positions, inverted, etc.)... Every shot taken I ran the turret whether it was needed or not and shot at all different powers... Furthest shot taken was a tad over 1800 yds... Not once did the eye relief enter the equation much less "kiss my brow"... Before the ClownShoes Squadron condemns a product it'd be nice if they at least had a clue of what they spew...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,730
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,730 |
EHG, that gun is a Frankenstein, but I'll bet it'll outshoot any of mine.
I may have to buy one of these demon scopes just to say I own one of them.....lol....
I may have to put it on my .22 Hornet so I don't clip my eyebrow.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065 |
Impossible!!! No way a Nightforce in Talley Lightweights holds up to that. Who ya trying to fool..... You forgot to post a picture of some holes in paper to prove the scope is Uber..... "ClownShoes Squadron".......spot on...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,281
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,281 |
Elkhuntingguide,
Good for you on shooting that SHV. As for the name calling, it is laughable, insults seem to be the norm on 24 hr.
Took some time to look at other manufacturer's scopes with similar magnification to compare the eye relief. Burris , Sightron, Swarovski, and Leupold use 3.5” or more. Even Nightforce with its other SHVs use more eye relief, the shortest was the SHV 5-20 x 56 3.1"- 3.5".
Leupold does offer 3” eye relief for their rimfire scopes.
I couldn’t find ANY scope anywhere that uses 2.8” for the eye relief, which it would be when that SHV is set on 14X.
I choose not to own one.
Last edited by Azshooter; 02/09/16.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552 |
Thanks for taking the time to actually use and post on the scope. Much appreciated.
Please God, give me some good tags this year....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498 |
As for the name calling, it is laughable, insults seem to be the norm on 24 hr.
The "norm" on the campfire seems to be people posting outta their ass on schitt they have no clue about using something they read or heard from a buddy, read in a gun rag or seen it once from afar at band camp... This thread is a perfect example of that... I can see 4 if not more posts solidifying that... As for the name calling... If the shoe fits....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,767
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,767 |
So Nightfarce makes SHV scopes that vary quality wise?
The 3-10 is different than the 4-14 and the 4-14 is different thant the 5-20??
I shot the 5-20. Sucked complete ASS!
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498 |
So Nightfarce makes SHV scopes that vary quality wise?
The 3-10 is different than the 4-14 and the 4-14 is different thant the 5-20??
I shot the 5-20. Sucked complete ASS! They make different Models in the SHV line... I don't see where they differ quality wise... No different than any other scope company... For instance the scope company you choose to "champion" makes different VX-3 scopes and different Mark 4 scopes... The difference is, I have not seen a quality issue between the SHV series as you have with Leupold by your own admission... Just having to send things in for repair. Even though it comes back fixed, a guy shouldn't have to do that. I have had one particular product line from Leupold that seems to want to return home frequently; the VX3's and Variable Mark 4's with the 30mm tubes. The Mark 4 M5 A2 is simply the best scope I or anyone I know has ever seen, on the other hand.
I realize that all scopes break or fail regardless of the brand, but the 30mm tube offerings from Leupold seem to be prone to this for some reason.
Sad thing but true... The least expensive SHV I own (3-10x42) has out preformed every leupold I have ever been behind... Ever... Including your über VX-6...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,767
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,767 |
Well it seems Leupold has shored up their Mark 4 and VX3 issues now. Their attention to servicing their product, re-engineering it making it better and R&D,seem to be head and shoulders above everything else available
The SHV sucked ASS. I've used and evaluated other offerings from Nightforce and they were excellent.
Leupold is tough to beat for price, quality, attentive customer service, light weight hunting scopes and the like. I'll put any Mark 4 M5A2, Mark 8, VX-6 ahead of anything in the class NF has to offer
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,498 |
Well it seems Leupold has shored up their Mark 4 and VX3 issues now. Their attention to servicing their product, re-engineering it making it better and R&D,seem to be head and shoulders above everything else available LMAO...Sounds like a Leupy ad on the hunting channel... I would hope after 10-12 years of selling schitt erectors and sub standard QC that one of their 600+ employee's would have a clue... That still remains to be seen... The SHV sucked ASS. I've used and evaluated other offerings from Nightforce and they were excellent. Ya I think you've said that before... Considering the source it means little to nothing... I have heard you are a fine connoisseur of sucking ASS... Leupold is tough to beat for price, quality, attentive customer service, light weight hunting scopes and the like. I'll put any Mark 4 M5A2, Mark 8, VX-6 ahead of anything in the class NF has to offer Price wise their VX offerings tempt many... The M5A2 and Mark 8 not so much or are they anywhere near worth the money... The 8 was probably their best attempt at the Tactical market and a guy willing to spend that amount I've seen lean towards S&B or TT... VX-6 is priced so so but all it has going for it is glass... I've seen 3 of em and two had excellent glass... Third the glass was schitt... All three had problems with holding zero, tracking and RTZ or a mixture there of... Kinda negates the glass... Although once they "shore" up those little issues they maybe on to something for loyal leupy lovers... Quality wise they have a ways to go... Weight wise they are a leader but IMHO that leads to their quality, durability and tracking issues... I would gladly give up 8 ozs for peace of mind that my scope will always work... Leupold will never be a leader as far as durability, tracking or function... They have nice glass but to choose a scope because the glass is nice is more than foolish...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 116
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 116 |
I have zero experience with the SHV F1, but, for those concerned with the eye relief... the 4-16 ATACR has 3.35" of relief, so very similar to the F1 SHV. I've spent some time behind that scope and it didn't feel tight at all. If you're considering the SHV, I think the 18x Bushnell LRHS would be a good choice as well. They will be offering illumination in that line this year (If that's a deciding factor for you).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552 |
That is the other scope on my short list.
Please God, give me some good tags this year....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
New Member
|
New Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23 |
@EHG Thx for actually shooting that scope on a big gun and posting your info. I was thinking I would like to try that scope on a 300 Weatherby and now I think I will.
|
|
|
|
641 members (1badf350, 12344mag, 06hunter59, 10gaugemag, 1beaver_shooter, 10gaugeman, 75 invisible),
2,534
guests, and
1,291
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,687
Posts18,456,421
Members73,909
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|