Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Coming To A Montana Town Near You...Islamic Refugees

We have some in Boise, they are housed in an apartment building just a few blocks away from me. Apparently this is some kind of subsidized temporary housing since I’ve seen a lot of Somalis there previously.

The Somalis are okay. Most are black as midnight and you see them in family groups at WinCo, the men are all skinny and the women have their bright yellow and red clothes on with babies slung in those cloth hammocks over their backs. I wish them well, they came from a sh-thole and I hope they do okay in America.

But now there are some obviously Middle Eastern families there, you can see the women in full hijab from head to toe. Taking a wait and see attitude but I can already see some cultural conflicts developing over what is considered normal over there vs. what is considered rude as hell here.

Until reading the article I didn't realize Montana's governor has the same stupid look on his face as Oregon's for the last 30 years. Granted yours is much prettier than ours right now.

Well boys good luck. As liberalism spreads across your state, trying to hide from it works about like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

Square mileage doesn't matter, it's the liberal population bases that do a hostile takeover with their deranged, mindless smile. Your new gun laws won't be too far away.........

We have quite a few Bosnians here. They aren't like the ME Muslims, though. They're trying to assimilate.

Why not? The Government has plenty of land to give them.

Yes, there are Muslims who are bent on violence and we need to identify and keep those individuals out of the nation. However, the vast majority are peaceful and looking for a better (and safer) life; many are highly educated and can contribute to the prosperity of the US.

The same holds true of Latinos entering the US. The vast majority just want a better life. If caught entering illegally, they are returned to their native countries; most are not Mexicans, but are from other Latin countries and just passing through Mexico.

However, there is one Latin nation from which any person reaching US soil is automatically admitted, no matter how they crossed into US space - Cuba. The Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 enabled this; it was amended in 1976. And, unlike other immigrants, Cubans are not required to enter the United States at a port-of-entry. Also, being a public charge doesn't make a Cuban ineligible to become a permanent resident.

The vast majority of Cuban refugees are peaceful, law-abiding residents, but Cubans have been involved in terrorist acts here in the US. For a rundown on these acts see: http://cuban-exile.com/doc_051-075/doc0073.html

Recognizing the contributions made by Cuban refugees, few have called for banning all Cubans from the US for the acts of a minority. Something to think about.

Yes, there are Muslims who are bent on violence and we need to identify and keep those individuals out of the nation. However,

It's a huge mistake that is going to cost our country in blood. The problem with liberals is they live in a world that doesn't exist instead of current reality. If you can't sort them out, then none of them should be let in.

If they decide not to integrate, you'll be proven right.

Keep in mind that many immigrant groups take several generations to assimilate. Consider the Italians, Greeks, Poles, Russians, etc.; they tended to settle into enclaves in cities where they only spoke their native language, wore their native clothing, honored their native holidays and traditions and, continued their native customs.

Were jihad and terrorism part of those groups' native customs???

Yes, there are Muslims who are bent on violence and we need to identify and keep those individuals out of the nation. However, the vast majority are peaceful and looking for a better (and safer) life; many are highly educated and can contribute to the prosperity of the US.

The same holds true of Latinos entering the US. The vast majority just want a better life. If caught entering illegally, they are returned to their native countries; most are not Mexicans, but are from other Latin countries and just passing through Mexico.

However, there is one Latin nation from which any person reaching US soil is automatically admitted, no matter how they crossed into US space - Cuba. The Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 enabled this; it was amended in 1976. And, unlike other immigrants, Cubans are not required to enter the United States at a port-of-entry. Also, being a public charge doesn't make a Cuban ineligible to become a permanent resident.

The vast majority of Cuban refugees are peaceful, law-abiding residents, but Cubans have been involved in terrorist acts here in the US. For a rundown on these acts see: http://cuban-exile.com/doc_051-075/doc0073.html

Recognizing the contributions made by Cuban refugees, few have called for banning all Cubans from the US for the acts of a minority. Something to think about.

We've barely kept our heads above the liberal sewer scumb for decades here in Montana despite the "conservative western" image.

However there is a guy named Greg Gianforte running for guv. next cycle who's gaining some serious ground that actually has the audacity to talk in favor of constitutional values so there may a reprieve coming in the future.

I bet most of them will do fine in Missoula. By Montana standards, Missoula is a very ethnically, racially, and culturally diverse and tolerate community. Case in point, consider the Hmong community in Missoula. Starting in 1975-76, many of them were resettled in Missoula from the refugee camps in Laos after the US withdrew from the war in Vietnam. Today, they seem to be doing very well in Missoula and I believe most folks consider them to be an asset to the community.

I worry more about the 'refugees' from Texas, Illinois, Michigan, California, Ohio, New York, Florida, Georgia, etc., etc. fitting in here in Montana...