Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Elk Hunting Charges Filed!!! - 2015 Washington Raffle Tag Elk - Todd Reichert

I don't have a dog in this fight but I am getting a little tired of your continual references to how much this guy has donated. Did I miss something new the regulations that if you donate a certain amount then the rules/laws no longer apply to you?

You guys all need to let this rest, the proof will be in the proverbial pudding.

Hunt Area: For elk, any 300 or 500 series GMU EXCEPT those GMUs closed to elk hunting and those GMUs not open to branch antlered bull elk hunting by the fish and wildlife commission.

This is how that statement is interpreted:

Hunt Area: For elk, any 300 or 500 series GMU
EXCEPT those GMUs closed to elk hunting and EXCEPT those GMUs not open to branch antlered bull elk hunting by the fish and wildlife commission.

Not:

Hunt Area: For elk, any 300 or 500 series GMU EXCEPT those GMUs closed to elk hunting as well as not open to branch antlered bull elk hunting.

That little trick has already been tried and has been found wanting by the Courts. "Closed to elk hunting" already makes those areas "not open to branch antlered elk hunting."

At the end of the day that is all they have and so you just have to accept that they will continue to circle back to it. It gets redundant, but just to warn you, they will be back there sooner rather than later.

Looks like 334 is open to bull hunting, albeit muzzleloader and early spike BULL, with permission from wdfw, you don't want me on that jury!! Laffin

How many winning Raffle chances for this South Central Big Game Raffle did Todd Reichert purchase?

He bought one winning ticket and only one winning ticket.

That means he paid $17 for the Raffle chance and that is all he paid for this winning ticket.


The Law doesn't care how many loosing chances he purchased and as a matter of fact he has no more right than would somebody's grandmother who had only spent $17 on WDFW Raffle opportunities in her lifetime and for that $17 had bought a single ticket and he has no more right than her to go outside or beyond what is allowed in for in WAC 232-28-283 Big game and wild turkey auction, raffle, and special incentive permit winners.

Nor do any of his past, present or future contributions factor in. They may factor in if and when it comes time to consider a just penalty, but they do not influence guilt or innocence in this case.

The prosecution would not even need to "burn a peremptory" to excuse the likes of you from any jury pool involving game law violation. You would be tossed for cause.

Lots of grey, or is it gray?? Laffin

What pississ you off more the fact that todd killed the elk or you did not have the chops to become a game warden. just imagine if you would have made the cut and could bust the big bad poacher your self. Tell your wife I said she's welcome.

That bull was a few miles from my house and I have pics of him
On game cams. Moss's crew are dbags

Shame that bull was taken using unethical methods

I know very little about the hunt in question. My response to the op is based on the pugettroplis pukes that have done everything possible to screw up hunting in this state. The liberal BS and laws they have pushed pissmeoff. you can bet a years wages the op voted for obummer, Inslee, goldmark,he has attended at least two gay weddings and hates assault weapons. Its the MO up north and this POS fits the bill to a T. He is the kinda prick that calls the cops if you have music playing past 9 and mows his lawn at 6 in the am.

You guys should get a room.

It is rather interesting how the little brown-noser suckups come out of the woodwork to defend these serial game law violators so long as they are high net income individuals or celebrities.

There a small percentage of regular participants in these Auctions and "flood" game Tag Raffles with mass buys who I refer to the "usual suspects."

It seems that when they are involved, all too often controversy raises it's ugly head. And when they are once again in trouble w/the law - by God here comes a whole contingent of crackpots ready to defend them.

The violation in this case is so obvious that at best extremely poor judgement was used. It is either that or there was a deliberate and systematic effort that set out from the beginning to poach one of these monster bulls that reside in GMU 334 and only rarely do they leave GMU 334.

Those who are defending this act are defending the indefensible.

And nobody gives a sh** about it except you three.

ToddNEWY,



You think some are not above the law? Look at Hillary. In fact almost any Democrat.

And you. You obviously GAS or you would not keep coming here to post how much you don't GAS.

Once again,smokepole re to cock talk....

Not only unethical, totally taken well within a unit that was closed and off limits to that Tag. That makes it poached.

No, I'd just like you to STFU. This forum is not your personal place to grind your axe.

Oh, OK!! Laffin

Looks like someone else is doin the grinding but in your usual fashion, you got get right in the middle of it...

keep the cock talk to a minimum please.

Oh woe is me... .. . woe is me. You came here of your own volition and you keep coming back and it is making you uncomfortable to visit this thread.

Here's a suggestion: Go pound sand.