Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Trump will win in a total blow out landslide.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/trump-raises-3-million-online-since-tuesday/?cat_orig=politics

You heard it here first!

Money pouring in like water.
He finally got serious and destroyed her in yesterdays lecture.

Hillary is SO dirty and Trump is willing to hit her with all of it with the gloves off.

Hillary; its over. I know you are sad and depressed but please... save yourself the embarrassment and go home... take up knitting or sewing or cookie baking.

WND isn't a source I'd bet any money on.
Trump might win, but it won't be by much, and it's far more likely he will lose

I don't think you know if he will win or lose, anymore than anybody else does. Personally, I think the polling has been slanted to create your opinion. Nobody likes a loser, and Trump has continually been painted as a loser, even when he has just trounced his opposition. The media - even the alleged conservative media - has been pretty anti Trump, and he still wins. Sadly, the media runs the opinions of the US. Hopefully, they are wrong. Like him or not, if you prefer Clinton you are an idiot.

That explains why he's trailing her by 13 points in the latest polls.

The media tried that with Reagan back in 1980, turned out different by a landslide. Same thing with Bush Jr., twice, he still won.

Gotta remember that many people who don't vote in the primary do vote in the general. I think of that number Trump will carry a much greater percentage.

MSN just polled their readers yesterday ( MSN!!!) With 560,000 votes in it was Trump at 56% and Hillary at 31%


You can vote for loudmouth and stupid, or you can vote for pure evil.

Stupid? Obongo is stupid. Neither Trump or Hillary are. Anyways, the evil is so strong in Clinton, I don't know how long even the adoring media can keep it from the voters.

They will sure try, though.

Relentlessly.

You have a point there...but I don't think the National Lawn Jockey is stupid. He has succeeded in running the greatest country in the world into the ground...just as he'd hoped for...

Well, based on my thread count, it's for sure I hang out with loudmouth and stupid.



Evil, not so much....

Billboard material, there.

Obama IS stupid. The people that have propped him up are not. I doubt he ever had an original thought in his life. The affirmative action President.

The RCP General Election of Trump vs. Clinton has ten polls in their average from June 2-22.
Clinton leads Trump in every one of them with 2 to 12 points.

do not quote national preference polls, mean nothing
all that counts are contested states

as of 6/21

"Hillary Clinton is leading Donald Trump in Florida by 8 percentage points, but they're virtually tied in Pennsylvania and in a dead heat in Ohio, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday.

Clinton leads Trump 47 to 39 percent in Florida, they're tied at 40 percent in Ohio and she has a small edge on him, 42 to 41 percent, in Pennsylvania."

now Rubio is back in and will endorse Trump

its a long time till november and hillary may not even be the nominee

try this on from 1980

"Yet there was more to the 1980 campaign than the final game-changing debate rhetoric — and some of the details are relevant.

Carter conceded that he could not run on his economic record — not with a high “misery index’ driven by high inflation, high interest rates, high gas prices, and high unemployment. The lengthy Iranian hostage crisis finally began to highlight rather than mask Carter’s anemic domestic leadership. Without a record to defend, Carter instead pounded Reagan as too ill-informed and too dangerous to be president."

now updated

"Yet there was more to the 2016 campaign than the game-changing debate rhetoric — and some of the details are relevant.

Clinton conceded that she could not run on Obama's economic record — not with a high “misery index’ driven by no GDP growth, corrupt IRS and high real unemployment. The lengthy ISIS terrorist crisis and State Department scandals finally began to highlight rather than mask Obama's and Clinton's anemic domestic leadership. Without any record to defend, Clinton instead pounded Trump as too ill-informed and too dangerous to be president."

"ca-ching"

It's "cha-ching" Larry, you idiot..

Larry Root is now stoolreacher?

Stool Research,....

ingwe



How many billions have you earned and how many employees to you have?

I'm not a trump fan but he has had a very good week. If he keeps this up he will win in a landslide.

The voting public is stupid, that's why he got voted in for two terms.

It doesn't take a real smart guy to make big changes when given a free pass to do so. This cat could burn the White House to the ground on national T.V. and get away with it.

Nope. I'm looking at you in the rear view mirror on that call.

Or how many billions have you lost and how many folks have you laid off?

Thank you for the support but I suspended my campaign months ago.




Clark

Hahahahahahahahahahahaaaa!

Interesting how the thread title has almost zero to do with the linked article.

But, typical 24HCF.

Id take any claims eminating from the Trump camp with a grain of salt, hes a serial liar !

like his claim that he worth 10 Billion, try like $1.5B according to the eggspurts and nobody knows how badly he is leveraged due to minimal reporting standards.

Trumps hasnt got a snowflakes chance in Hell.

What til he files his donation report at the end of Month.

I suspect you will all be overwhelmed lol

I seem to recall similar enthusiastic claims on this forum that the Republican candidate would win the previous two elections for POTUS, but Barack Obama is the one still occupying the White House. I'll hold my nose and vote once again for the conservative nominee hoping for the best, but I certainly won't be making any predictions.

If the bitches 2A stance alone doesn't win this for Trump, then we're all screwed.

May as well shut down the 24HCF now.

English much?

70 percent of registered voters now say they dislike Mr. Trump, including more than three-quarters of women and nearly 90 percent of nonwhite people, according to a new Washington Post/ABC News poll. Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democratic nominee, has opened a double-digit lead in some national polls.

haha ratsack thanks for the headsup

Yup. He needs to stick to a carefully planned script and be patient.

So retard, if Trump is so behind in the polls explain his raising 11 million since Tuesday, after releasing a single fundraising email?

STFU already! I wouldn't believe one of their "polls" if it said that there would be daylight tomorrow! and neither would you... so STFU !

HELLO !

do not quote national preference polls, mean nothing
all that counts are contested states

Trump is not my first choice... But now he is the only Choice..

And you're part of the 90%

No, it's a sand headed barby from oz that has no business worrying about our politics, probably on some bitcoin account slinging BFS to stimulate post count along with a handful of others here.

You must be a Trump Chump...everybody who disagrees with Trump...STFU!

Of course, we all know what the GD alternative is.

that sums it up about as well as I've seen

It sure as hell is not Clinton. She will not survive the FBI.

You have to go back 20 polls to May 19 to find the last poll with Trump holding a 2 point lead.
And Trump criticizes Romney for not beating Obama?

Saw a poll on Wifeys msn homepage yesterday that had Trump ahead by 15%

bowslurper is an idiot, hasn't been right on anything in this election Gunner.

What's that about hillary blowing away trump in the polls?


http://www.allenbwest.com/analytica...slim-ban-liberal-media-will-never-report

He got my vote...

That's easy.

If you only poll Democrats, the Democrat candidate will tend to lead in those polls, even if she's a felon and a traitor.

FYI...I was a Cruz guy...so quit stirring the pot and get on board or just STFU

I was a Cruz guy and debated all comers. Never told anyone to STFU.

you're a damn liberal.

Who voted for Goldwater

What else would you expect from a Muslim?

The "Q" factor has been avoided this election, and for good reason.

And it explains the outcome of more elections than a patriotic American can be comfortable with.

Conservative and patriotic Americans, with the best interests of the country at heart, have never been able to explain R losses, as the R candidate at least, and most of the time, toes the conservative line, at least during the campaign.

But the real deciding factor may simply be the "Q", i.e., how popular the candidate is.

1980: Reagan's actor background and personality killed the dullard peanut farmer.

1992: Clinton was all personality, and kicked the shiz outta GHWB, who had none.

1996: Clinton again, against a corpse.

2000: Closest race in history was a result of two of the biggest stiffs ever to run for pres. Little GWB was so stiff he couldn't complete a sentence, and Gore was a monotone speaking idiot. Surprised he didn't drool during a speech.

2004: Little GWB versus an even bigger a$$hole, Kerry.

2008: Timid midget with a lisp v. O'Buckwheat.

2012: Vampire RINOmoney v. O'Buckwheat.

It's been all about youth and/or personality, rather than the lofty ideas the candidates have put forth.

Now, there's the pendulum factor, plus the personality contest. Country's been swingin every 8 since GHWB.

DT, brash and straight-talkin Mr. Energy, v. Cankles the platitude-shrieker.

Finally...something that makes sense...

Trump hasnt raised [bleep] til money has hit the bank accounts

Im guessing his email runs like a pledge and you commit to donating, either way he's damaged goods and only has a small pool of idiots to raise from.

For those interested he didnt spend a cent of his own money for the initial nomination process, he lent his nomination $45 million and expects it back with interest from the GOP.

lmao, my but you're a dumb fu-ck.

Pat Buchannan nails it as to why Trump wins big:


Has Trump found the formula?

Pat Buchanan calls Donald's speech this week 'surprisingly aspirational, hopeful, inclusive'
Published: 13 hours ago

Patrick J. Buchanan
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/has-trump-found-the-formula/#UuhZJLzRZJXJ8CJw.99

Stripped of its excesses, Donald Trump’s Wednesday speech contains all the ingredients of a campaign that can defeat Hillary Clinton this fall.

Indeed, after the speech ended Clinton was suddenly defending the Clinton Foundation against the charge that it is a front for a racket for her family’s enrichment.







The specific charges in Trump’s indictment of Clinton: She is mendacious, corrupt, incompetent and a hypocrite.

“Hillary Clinton … is a world-class liar,” said Trump. She faked a story about being under fire at a Bosnia airport, the kind of claim for which TV anchors get fired. She has lied repeatedly about her email server.

She lied to the families of victims of the Benghazi massacre by implying the atrocity was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Islamic video, not the premeditated act of Islamist terror she knew it to be.

Drop “world-class” and Trump’s case is open and shut.

His second charge: “Hillary has perfected the politics of personal profit and theft” and “may be the most corrupt person ever to seek the presidency.”

Particulars?

Bill Clinton got $750,000 for a speech from a telecom company facing State Department sanctions for providing technology to Iran. The Clintons got the cash; the telecom company got no sanctions.




“Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium holdings to Russia, while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.”

Trump added, “She ran the State Department like her own personal hedge fund – doing favors for oppressive regimes … for cash.”

Together, she and Bill have raked in $153 million since 2001 in speaking fees from “lobbyists, CEOs and foreign governments.”

These figures are almost beyond belief.

Sherman Adams had to resign as Ike’s chief of staff for accepting a vicuna coat from Bernard Goldfine, who had problems with federal regulators.

Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

When ex-President Reagan, after brain surgery, visited Japan to receive that nation’s highest honor, The Grand Cordon of the Supreme Order of the Chrysanthemum, and got a $2 million fee from the media company that hosted his nine-day visit, our liberal editorial pages vomited out their revulsion and disgust.

Where are those media watchdogs today?

Rather than condemning the Clintons’ greed, their conflicts of interest and their egregious exploitation of their offices, the media are covering for Hillary and digging for dirt on Trump.

To substantiate his charge of incompetence, Trump notes that Clinton as senator voted for arguably the greatest strategic blunder in U.S. history, the invasion of Iraq.

She pushed the attack that ousted Col. Gadhafi and unleashed terrorists who took over much of Libya and murdered our ambassador.

She played a leading role in launching the insurrection against Bashar Assad that has left hundreds of thousands dead, uprooted half of Syria and sent millions of refugees to seek asylum in Europe.

Primary beneficiary: ISIS, with its capital in Raqqa.

And the hypocrisy charge?

Though Hillary and Bill Clinton profess to be the fighting champions of women’s equality and gay rights, they have banked millions in speaking feels and tens of millions in contributions to the Clinton Foundation from Islamic regimes under whose rule women are treated as chattel and homosexuals are flogged, beheaded and stoned to death.

Why do major media let them get away with such hypocrisy?

Because, ideologically, politically, socially, morally and culturally, the major media are with them.

While making the case for the indictment of Hillary Clinton, Trump also outlined an agenda with appeal not only to nationalists, populists and conservatives but working-class and minority Democrats.

If Trump is elected, an economic system “rigged” to enable big corporations to leave and take factories and jobs abroad, and bring their goods back free of charge to kill companies that stay in America, will end.

“Globalism” will be replaced by “Americanism.”

Trade and tax policies will be rewritten to provide incentives for companies to bring jobs and factories here. Was this not also Bernie Sanders’ message? He stood against NAFTA in the 1990s when the Clintons colluded with Bush Republicans to impose it.

In his peroration, Trump spoke of what we Americans had done, how we had lost our way, but how we could, together, make her great again. His finale was surprisingly aspirational, hopeful, inclusive.

In the political year just ended, several unmistakable messages have been delivered.

First, the record turnout for Trump and remarkable turnout for Ted Cruz represented a repudiation of Beltway Republicanism.

Second, the amazing success of 74-year-old socialist Bernie Sanders in keeping Clinton embattled until California showed that the Democratic young have had enough of Clintonism.

A majority of the nation said loud and clear: We want change.

Hillary Clinton’s vulnerability is that Americans distrust her; no one believes she represents change; and she has no agenda and no vision.

Her campaign for president is all about her.

As Trump noted, even her slogan is, “I’m with her.”

Rough and raw as it was in parts, Donald Trump’s speech on Wednesday contains the elements of a campaign that can win

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/has-trump-found-the-formula/#UuhZJLzRZJXJ8CJw.99

I guess most people still don't realize that all poles are meaningless no matter who conducts them. How can you have a meaningful poll when only 1000 or so people are polled out of many millions? Most polls are phone polls and the pollster has no idea who they're talking to. When they call say they call a Registered Republican or Democrat listed phone number how do they know if they are talking to that person, it might be one of their teenage kids. The pollsters can make the poll come out any way they want to by the questions they ask, who they poll and where they poll. I partially participated in a phone survey in the last presidential race (the first and only time). I was asked a serious of valid sounding questions and my answers reflected my conservative views. When we got to the last question it was worded in a way so the only logical answer would be a direct contradiction of all my previous answers. I told them to never call me again and hung up.

Absolutely. Polls are only useful as propoganda.

I never answer polls myself, but I use them all the time to test the wind.

FiveThirtyEight keep track of hundreds of polls in their pollster ratings.
This season the polls used in the RCP average have been accurate about about 70 percent or better with a few over 90 percent in calling races.

Has Trump commmented on that Secret Service book yet?

That guy is dropping some bombs on Hillary

Said he walked in on Bill porking Walter Mondale's daughter and Monica Lewinsky freaked out when she heard about him "cheating" on her.

LAST TRY AT EDUCATION !

national polls mean NOTHING !!!!

a few states will decide the outcome

polling in THOSE STATES ONLY might be instructive

FL, OH AND PA

if trump wins those and traditional red states he will win.

NOTHING ELSE MATTERS !!!!!!!!

STFU, Larry..

No, you go to his site and your credit card is instantly charged when you make your donation.

And or course our dumb fugk of a president opened his cock holster well before this outcome was known.

I hope Trump brings it up for a week straight.




Dave

Yep, until just before an election, the only purpose for publishing polling results is to manipulate public opinion towards where the pollsters want it to be. Only just before an election do they switch to trying to actually predict the outcome, thus increasing their credibility, and thus their ability to sway public opinion with future published poll results.

corrected

don't plan to

you are ?

And how do u know I was addressing you, Larry? BTW, your sentence structure and punctuation SUCK.

The people of the United Kingdom have exercised the sacred right of all free peoples. They have declared their independence from the European Union and have voted to reassert control over their own politics, borders and economy. A Trump Administration pledges to strengthen our ties with a free and independent Britain, deepening our bonds in commerce, culture and mutual defense. The whole world is more peaceful and stable when our two countries – and our two peoples – are united together, as they will be under a Trump Administration.


Come November, the American people will have the chance to re-declare their independence. Americans will have a chance to vote for trade, immigration and foreign policies that put our citizens first. They will have the chance to reject today’s rule by the global elite, and to embrace real change that delivers a government of, by and for the people. I hope America is watching, it will soon be time to believe in America again.

---------

speeches like that will help

Well said, and spot on.

USA!! USA!!

Does Bristoe know you're auditioning for his spot?

He may win, he may not...it's gonna come down to two issues...gun control & immigration...(I think we're used to the schitt economy)

Looking at the results of yesterdays vote in Great Britain, I'm holding out hope that America does the same & tells the politicos to fugg off...

KFWA
Send that to Trump headquarters

that was Trumps speech in Scotland

WND is like Rob Jordan posting National Review. But I tell you what, if he sticks to the issues like he did last speech, it's possible. He is on the winning side of almost all the issues, if he can continue to keep his yap in check.

Im just waiting for Trump to release his Tax retrurns and self fund his campaign like he promised......lol

A vote for Trump is a Vote to gut the 2nd Stupid !

Surrrreee it is...

corrected again

if brief internet posts are understood sentence structure and punctuation are not required

again, you are ?

It's "cute" that you think your thoughts/opinions mean schit on this side of the Pond where politics is concerned.

George

And a vote for Hillary?

The liberals make a lot of noise, and love polls, protests, gets lots of media hype, and so on. They probably look like a bigger voting block than they actually are.

The conservatives are on average quieter, get less media attention, and just show up to vote.

Personally I never participate in polls. It's all BS, and the politicians only want the polling info to help them polish their lies.