24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,747
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,747
The .264" 143gr out of a 6.5 SAUM killed two oryx in New Mexico recently with stellar performance


Originally Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
GB1

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,814
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,814
rcamuglia,

What was the impact velocities?


"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation."
Everyday Hunter
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,111
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,111
Originally Posted by firstcoueswas80
No thanks in the ABLR, they're no bueno. I think the heaviest scirocco is 150 in 284 isn't it?


What's not to love about the 175 ABLR? Do they not shoot in your 28 Casey? I killed my elk and moose last year with my 28 Nosler using the Nosler factory 175 loads as I didn't have time for load development and they shot .5 moa anyway. Two one shot kills - 200 yards on the elk and 568 yards on the moose. Perfect bullet performance, just like the 190 ABLR's I used the year before on my moose out of a .300WM. I love them.


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,796
F
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,796
When my rifle was a 7 lrm, I had crushed bullets during seating, sparatic accuracy, and a lot of 2 in 1 out groups. I originally thought it easy bedding, but after having the amity double check the bedding, and research it a operated the 2 in 1 out was pretty normal for amino peers over 3000.

805, in my opnion, after running the numbers of the 195 @ 3000 and the 180 Hybrid and 175 eld at 3150-3200, there wasn't enough gained until I believe 1200 yards or so to warrant using that bullet

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,016
8
805 Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
8
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,016
Casey
I understand the numbers with the 195vs 180 hybrids. IMO I'd load both and see which shoot better. Both bullets will get it done on elk!

IC B2

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,796
F
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,796
Ha. Me having an Elk tag more then once a decade! That's funny!

My rifle is also 1:9 reisted, so I'm nit sure I could even stabilize those 195s

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,460
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,460
Originally Posted by firstcoueswas80
When my rifle was a 7 lrm, I had crushed bullets during seating, sparatic accuracy, and a lot of 2 in 1 out groups. I originally thought it easy bedding, but after having the amity double check the bedding, and research it a operated the 2 in 1 out was pretty normal for amino peers over 3000.

805, in my opnion, after running the numbers of the 195 @ 3000 and the 180 Hybrid and 175 eld at 3150-3200, there wasn't enough gained until I believe 1200 yards or so to warrant using that bullet


IME, you'd come within 100fps of your 180 load with the 195. I'm betting you'd stabilize them in your 9 twist...

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,016
8
805 Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
8
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,016
I'm betting it will stabilize the 195s. What I meant was load both and test for groups and drop. Whichever shoots better from your rifle I'd go with. Either bullet will be a hammer. My buddy is using the 180 hybrids over retumbo with excellent range results so far. RL33 is also a great powder in 28nosler.

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,395
F
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
F
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,395
Originally Posted by jetbrook
Ok so what LR bullet is good for impact velocities above 3000 ft/sec.



None. Not if you want picture perfect mushrooms at 3k plus FPS, and good expansion at 1,600-1,800 FPS. They are called "Long Range" bullets for a reason. The whole purpose of bullets such as the ELD-X and ABLR is to offer great expansion/fragmentation at low impact velocities, while having just enough "control" to make it into the chest cavity at 3K plus FPS.

Bullets such as those and Bergers and even AMAX's kill just fine up close but they won't look pretty when pulled out of the animal. Big deal.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312
Agree, though even in my small sample of 162 Amax deer kills I had one come completely apart and not reach the far lung on a broadside shot at 200 yards. MV was ~ 2950 fps. So....... I'm all for giving the ELD-X a whirl.


The CENTER will hold.

Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two

FÜCK PUTIN!
IC B3

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1
T
New Member
Offline
New Member
T
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1
Elkhunter 49 how did the Eld-X do on the Axis?

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

73 members (10gaugemag, 808outdoors, 264mag, 2500HD, 15 invisible), 1,116 guests, and 804 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,220
Posts18,447,483
Members73,899
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.049s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.8448 MB (Peak: 0.9357 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-16 07:31:57 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS