24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,123
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,123
Originally Posted by HogWild
Thoughts, or an alternative suggestion?


Been playing with a new 260 lately with 123 Amax in a 24" tube.

I started at 38 grains of both Varget and R-15.

Varget gave me 2785.

R-15 gave me 2725.

Accuracy didn't show up till 40 grains with either.....

6 year old thread, but still valid.....



GB1

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 944
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 944
I've had good luck with IMR 4895 in 308 with good accuracy, but dropping all the way down to 60% seems too low. Within reason 4895 seems ok.

I use cast data, and estimate charge weight to keep pressure above 40k on the low end. That seems more reasonable to me to get a complete burn and recoil is very soft at that level. Closer to 80%. 60% may be safe but I think it's better to use a faster powder as suggested.

For consistency, you want enough powder in the case so the primer can find it.

I know guys that use a case full of 4831 behind cast bullets to keep velocity low enough to prevent leading. Pressure and recoil is low and ignition is not an issue.


"Supernatural divinities are the primitive's answer to why the sun goes down at night..."
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008
Campfire Savant
Offline
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008
Read about reduced loads Hogdon reload center. You can take the max load of H 4895 x .60% to use as a starting load. You can the velocity for that max loadx60% and be very close. I load 243 and 270's for grandkids. I would be great for 260's also. I would use a 140 ballistic tip. Granddaughter has punched holes through some nice deer plus pigs with her 243, before she took 6.5 Creedmoor away from me. That means I will have to buy another one. The first is a Savage Hunter Predator. Thinking about a Vanguard in 6.5. Shoot em up!

Last edited by hanco; 08/08/16.
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 944
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 944
Or just load the 223 with 55 TTSX under a max load and bang-flop your way into no recoil nirvana.


"Supernatural divinities are the primitive's answer to why the sun goes down at night..."
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008
Campfire Savant
Offline
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008
I use the TTSX 62 grainers in my AR. Rips pigs end to end. Broke both shoulders of a 200lb male at 225 yds. Went all the way through. I expect it would kill a 125lb deer easy.

IC B2

Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 53
J
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
J
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 53
Bringing an old thread back up. Today I shot some loads taken from Seafire's data. I used SR 4759 and 100 grain Sierra HP's.
I used his recommendation of 20 grains to 25 grains. All loads were very mild in my grandsons Ruger M77 Compact.
The report was sharp out of that short 16.5 inch barrel though. Velocities over my Magnatech Chrony were as follows.
20 Grains = 2023 fps
21 Grains = 2094 fps
22 Grains = 2175 fps
23 Grains = 2243 fps
24 Grains = 2312 fps
25 Grains = 2373 fps
None of the loads showed signs of over pressure in my Nosler brass.
I plan to load up 5 with the 25 grain load and see what kind of group I get at 100 yards,

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 415
Campfire Member
Online Content
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 415
for my daughter's M70 FW 6.5x55mm swede we started out with NBT 100gr & trailboss, as a transition from 223 69gr she had been shooting.

Her rifle didn't seem to like 100gr Partitions that I wanted to use, so we stayed with the NBT 100gr with mild Varget for her 1st deer.

(I was lucky that GunLooney88 had been working through this with his daughter's swede, so his insight helped me sort it out pretty quickly)

Last edited by stealthgoat; 03/06/21. Reason: typo
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,201
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,201
Originally Posted by Seafire
Originally Posted by Ron_AKA
Hodgdon says it is safe to reduce H4895 loads down to 60% of the maximum listed for that powder. They warn not to go below 50%.


yeah unfortunately, accuracy sucks at best...

I still don't know why they push that powder when they have a lot of other powders that are better for reduced loads.. or reduced velocity/recoil loads..

such as IMR 4198, H 4198, SR 4759, H 322...for starters...

I have always personally thought they push it, as the load data they have was give to them by ADI....

H 4895 is great for making a gun go bank.. but for reduced loads.. accuracy stinks ( hit and miss at best) contains a VERY loud BOOM to it ( which can frighten young and new shooters)...

Not trying to dispute RON here, but I have tested it extensively to just try to get the results Hodgdon claims.. it has never been achievable for accuracy..


Seafire,
In the past when I've tried reduced H4895 accuracy was good but there was a lot of smoke and boom, and I expected recoil to be less.

For H4198 are you using the same 60% formula for reduced loads?

I just realized this is an ancient thread.........sheesh.

Last edited by alpinecrick; 03/06/21.

Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,861
O
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,861
Old or not, there are some good insights in this thread.


There are 2 rules to success:

1. Never tell everything that you know.
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,082
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,082
I think I got my info for my nephew's load from this thread 5 years ago. Settled at 29.5gr of IMR4198 under a 100gr Hornady SP. He killed several with that load before I moved him up to a full power 120gr load last year.


Those who must raise their voice to get their point across are generally not intelligent enough to do so in any other way.
IC B3

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by Seafire
Originally Posted by Ron_AKA
Hodgdon says it is safe to reduce H4895 loads down to 60% of the maximum listed for that powder. They warn not to go below 50%.


yeah unfortunately, accuracy sucks at best...

I still don't know why they push that powder when they have a lot of other powders that are better for reduced loads.. or reduced velocity/recoil loads..

such as IMR 4198, H 4198, SR 4759, H 322...for starters...

I have always personally thought they push it, as the load data they have was give to them by ADI....

H 4895 is great for making a gun go bank.. but for reduced loads.. accuracy stinks ( hit and miss at best) contains a VERY loud BOOM to it ( which can frighten young and new shooters)...

Not trying to dispute RON here, but I have tested it extensively to just try to get the results Hodgdon claims.. it has never been achievable for accuracy..


Seafire,
In the past when I've tried reduced H4895 accuracy was good but there was a lot of smoke and boom, and I expected recoil to be less.

For H4198 are you using the same 60% formula for reduced loads?

I just realized this is an ancient thread.........sheesh.



No I am not using the 60% rule with 4198, but it certainly is fine to do so...

At distances I usually hunt at.... which are what I refer to as 30/30 ranges... or sometimes 300 Savage ranges...

that is Muzzle Velocity of between 2200 fps, to 2400 fps... even with a spitzer bullet with your sights adjusted for deer at 3.5 inches at 100 yds, it will be dead on at 200 and will be 3.5 inches low at about 240 yds...which can be made an effective 250 to 300 yd load for deer....

and since 90% of most game is taken at 100 yds or less... and 95% is taken at 200 yds or less.... that pretty much fills most of my personal needs along with a lot of other folks....less recoil, makes hitting your target, and especially more pin point more than more recoil.....

some folks it doesn't matter... but those folks shoot a lot and know how to handle it... but they are in the minority...


"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC

“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,805
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,805
I rarely need truly reduced loads for my 308 rifles, but for the reasons you've mentioned I mostly shoot somewhat reduced loads in them. With 165/168 grain bullets I often mimic LC Match ammo at 2550 fps or thereabouts.

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 403
G
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
G
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 403
Sierra 120gr PH in front of 46.5 grs of H4350. This isn't a reduced load but my daughter has been shooting it since age 12 with no problems with recoil. She's now 20 and still shoots the same load with excellent results on deer.


Life's Tough, God's Good, Pray Hard!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 488
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 488
I’ve used 21.0 grains of BlueDot (gasp!) under a 100-grain Nosler Ballistic Tip for years in my 26” M700 VLS. Accuracy aggs around 1 moa and velocity is 2512 fps. Recoil is never high in the big M700, but is much less than factory level loads. That bullet kills well at that speed, excellent penetration and expansion in medium deer. 19.0 grains is more accurate, but is a bit slow for my hunting ranges.







.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,665
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,665
I load 24gr of H4895 with a 100gr BT for 2000fps and 32gr of H4895 with a 100gr PT for 2600fps in the .260 Rem I set up for my daughters.

Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 53
J
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
J
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 53
Shot the 25 grain load today to sight in and check group size.
I ended up with a 6 shot group 1 1/4 inches inside to inside at 100 yards.
I think this little Ruger M77 Compact will do the grandsons well.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,201
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,201

Thanks Seafire, good to know!


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 667
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 667
Well put me in the blue dot fan camp.

Getting a very consistent 2243fps avg. out of an 18.5” barrel rem model 7 with 100gr BTs over 19.1 gr. Going to load up a bunch and take a doe or two with it this year before letting my son shoot it next season. Thanks!

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,219
E
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
E
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,219
Some great info here


My heart's in the mountains, my heart is not here.
My heart's in the mountains, chasing the deer.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,230
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,230
Good info indeed. Should also apply to the 6.5CM with its similar case capacity. Have had good luck with Trailboss and Blue-Dot for the really light loads. An upper-end Blue-Dot load can be a fine killer at reasonable ranges. Then the 4198 loads are another notch higher in performance, as well as the lower-charge 4895 loads.


Now with even more aplomb
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

633 members (10gaugeman, 1minute, 12344mag, 1_deuce, 1eyedmule, 1beaver_shooter, 68 invisible), 2,982 guests, and 1,263 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,702
Posts18,456,802
Members73,909
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.067s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8963 MB (Peak: 1.0503 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-20 02:47:17 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS