|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,059
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,059 |
gnoahh, I got a little confused. Lyman uses cast bullets. Does that mean I can substitute identical weight jacketed bullet with same load data?
Yondering, so if I used Hodgdon's 60% rule for H4895, don't begin at their lightest 60% charge, correct?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,068
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,068 |
I'll leave it like this: I have, and had no issues, in a number of instances over the years. As with all advice garnered on the internet "you pays your money and takes your chances." In the end, a man has to step into the water to see just how deep it is.
"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz "Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697 |
Leo,
Cast bullet loads are waaay below SAAMI specs for pressure. Therefore substituting a jacketed bullet should present no problems.
if using H4895, and you start at their 60% rule, since it has been tried and tested by ADI who gave them the information, there should be zero issues. Same can apply to using IMR 4895 instead. All of these KaBooms one can hear about, happened with much slower powders being reduced, such as 4350, 4831 etc. Even P.O. Ackley tried to duplicate the situation in the lab, and couldn't, so he couldn't conclude why it happened.
Powders like 4198, can be reduced lower than the 60% rule with zero issues....I refer to Ingwe's Bunny Loads, as they are called on the campfire here, 12.5 grains of 4198 with a 50 grain bullet in a 223 case.
Using one's head, instead of letting old wives tales rule your thinking when at the load bench, goes a long way.
Most naythsayers will admit, they haven't worked with downloading cartridges much, if at all.... and then justify their lack of hands on experience, with the excuse "they know better". Apply that logic to the subject of driving a car, and you'll see how ridiculous that is.
Cast bullet manuals have loads that have been tested, so one is pretty safe with those. The most important issue in safety is one's loading techniques at the load bench. Its no different than when loading handgun cartridges, yet somehow rifle handloaders often think it is a case of being a mad scientist.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 23
New Member
|
New Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 23 |
I started a thread in the "Reloading" section, but since it is already being discussed here:
Has anyone clocked any reduced H4895 loads in 270 Win? For a 130-gr bullet I'm aiming for 2200 fps, and my dead reckoning suggests about 29.5 grs H4895. (Hodgdon's 60% rule yields 27 grs as the max safe reduced load.)
Last edited by brians356; 08/02/16.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008
Campfire Savant
|
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008 |
If you use 60% of the powder, will it give 60% of the velocity?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,052
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,052 |
Yes, with single-based powders like H4895. Within normal limits, velocities are proportional to charge.
Double-based powders don't work the same way. Velocity tends to decrease more than proportionally to charge, how much depending on the amount of nitroglycerin in the specific powder.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008
Campfire Savant
|
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008 |
That was really only a brain fart,but when I got got home I tried the 270 and 243's that are H4895 reduced to 60% of max. They were 61% for the 243's and 62% for the 270's. I loaded 5 270's at 80%. Sure enough, right on 80% of projected velocity. I thought that pretty cool!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,052
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,052 |
Yeah, it's real handy, especially when using either of the 4895's!
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,842
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,842 |
Yeah, it's real handy, especially when using either of the 4895's! And, if I understand these comments correctly, the IMR version doesn't have the loud report of the H version. Is that correct?
"An archer sees how far he can be from a target and still hit it, a bowhunter sees how close he can get before he shoots." It is certainly easy to use that same line of thinking with firearms. -- Unknown
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,052
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,052 |
I have no idea. They're all loud to me.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,252
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,252 |
I enjoy shooting cast bullets in the .45-70 with reduced loads (Unique & Trail Boss) and peep sights. Always fun to see how far I can hit the "dinger". Time to file down that front sight some more. :^)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,068
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,068 |
I have no idea. They're all loud to me. Huh? Whattid you say? I can't hear you.
"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz "Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 23
New Member
|
New Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 23 |
That was really only a brain fart,but when I got got home I tried the 270 and 243's that are H4895 reduced to 60% of max. They were 61% for the 243's and 62% for the 270's. I loaded 5 270's at 80%. Sure enough, right on 80% of projected velocity. I thought that pretty cool! Thanks, that's very useful data! I'm obliged to ya'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008
Campfire Savant
|
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008 |
The reduced loads seem quiet to me compare to regular loads. How could they be louder?? I will post some deer and pig pics killed with reduced loads tomorrow. The animals couldn't tell they had a little less powder.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,258
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,258 |
I HAVE NO IDEA. THEY'RE ALL LOUD TO ME. Huh? Whattid you say? I can't hear you. There fixed it for you. Can you hear him now?
Ed
A person who asks a question is a fool for 5 minutes the person who never asks is a fool forever.
The worst slaves are those that put the chains on themselves.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008
Campfire Savant
|
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008 |
Hey wifey, " Can you say that again?"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,842
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,842 |
The reduced loads seem quiet to me compare to regular loads. How could they be louder?? I will post some deer and pig pics killed with reduced loads tomorrow. The animals couldn't tell they had a little less powder. Hanco, did you ever find those pics?
"An archer sees how far he can be from a target and still hit it, a bowhunter sees how close he can get before he shoots." It is certainly easy to use that same line of thinking with firearms. -- Unknown
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,059
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,059 |
Well, I score one container of Trail Boss. That should work well in 223rem since blue dot can't be found here.
I will see if I can go back and buy few more containers. It's 9oz instead of 1 lb containers like rest of powder but it's still fairly big container for only 9oz.
So between some Trail Boss and H4895 I should be set!
Thank you all for you help and input, much appreciated!
|
|
|
|
613 members (10gaugeman, 1_deuce, 222Sako, 222ND, 10Glocks, 1234, 67 invisible),
2,648
guests, and
1,334
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,669
Posts18,455,992
Members73,909
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|