24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,914
O
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,914
I’m considering using 168-grain .308” Barnes TTSX in a 308 for elk this year. I remember several years ago it was commonly thought that you had to scrub the bore clean if you had used conventional bullets before switching over to Barnes. Is that still the case?

Thanks,


Okie John


Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
GB1

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,906
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,906

I've never had to do it, I swap back and forth with no issues.


When I die I hope I don't start voting democrat.
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,494
7
79S Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
7
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,494
Same here as well


Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.

Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,518
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,518
IMO, that is a hold over idea from the old X-Bullet days. I don't seem to get any more copper fouling with TTSX's than any other bullet. Switching from one to the other only happens at the range however.


If we live long enough, we all have regrets. But the ones that nag at us the most are the ones in which we know we had a choice.

Doug
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,914
O
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,914
Originally Posted by lastround
IMO, that is a hold over idea from the old X-Bullet days. I don't seem to get any more copper fouling with TTSX's than any other bullet. Switching from one to the other only happens at the range however.


I was hoping it was something like this.

Thanks to everyone who replied.


Okie John


Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
IC B2

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,944
K
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,944
Only switching issue I have is that once I switch to the Barnes TTSX or LRX, I ditch ALL other bullets, and never look back.

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,025
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,025
I've about settled on the 120 TTSX (or 120 E-Tip) in my 26 Nosler. They are both super accurate (half MOA) and kill stuff DRT at 3,400 fps.

But, my gun has been Dyna Bore Coated and fouling isn't a problem. A couple of soakings with Wipe Out Patch Out will do the job, Hawkeye borescope clean.

I sometimes shoot 140 NAB's or 140 NPT's, no problem swapping back and forth.

DF

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,110
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,110
Originally Posted by okie john
I’m considering using 168-grain .308” Barnes TTSX in a 308 for elk this year. I remember several years ago it was commonly thought that you had to scrub the bore clean if you had used conventional bullets before switching over to Barnes. Is that still the case?

Thanks,


Okie John


Why so heavy on the Barnes?




P


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,914
O
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,914
No reason. Do you have another recommendation?


Okie John


Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,110
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,110
I've read that the Barnes performs best at high velocity. Since they're designed to retain 99% of their weight most shooters drop a weight class to up the speed but don't sacrifice weight due to retention. So you might get better performance with a lighter Barnes.




P


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
IC B3

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,804
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,804
The heaviest I'd go with a Barnes in a 308 would be 150 grains.

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,016
8
805 Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
8
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,016
In the 308win I would also go 150gr TTSX.

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,025
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,025
Originally Posted by mathman
The heaviest I'd go with a Barnes in a 308 would be 150 grains.

Agree. You need speed with the monos.

Here's an interesting .308 copper option by Cutting Edge Bullets.

Kills well, petals fly off, core exits.

Kinda like a monometal Partition, if you will.

DF

[Linked Image]

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,914
O
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,914
Thanks. That makes a lot of sense.


Okie John


Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

70 members (35, 10Glocks, 14idaho, 6mmbrfan, 280shooter, 2500HD, 6 invisible), 1,548 guests, and 708 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,599
Posts18,454,536
Members73,908
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.094s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8509 MB (Peak: 0.9562 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-19 08:23:29 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS