Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Will talk of rigged elections end up hurting Trump?

I think the perpetually pu$$yhurt Cruz faction is here to stay for the next 4 years, minimum, no matter who wins. They'll be bleeding all over this forum from their eyes, from their wherever for a long time to come.

Re: Will talk of rigged elections end up hurting Trump

The election is over and his base will stand by him regardless but there is no chance he will attract anyone but that base...41% at very best!

I think this is where Trump will be hurt;





And what about his newest hotel venture?




Nobody Wants To Stay At Trump’s New DC Hotel




I think this is what Trump really fears....Brand damage

Because Clinton is an uninspiring, tainted candidate that nobody really likes.

Problem is, generally speaking, Trump is liked even less and after the debates is seen by most as unsuited temperamentally and intellectually for the job.

You can't alienate women, minorities, and centrists and win. Period. The angry old white guy vote won't cut it.

But the main reason you think what you think about this election is that are living in an echo chamber. You guys have become impossible to even talk politics with. You only listen to yourselves. Any opinion outside yours is shouted down. It's just a big circle-jerk with talk radio, the Internet, and the company you choose to keep.

Honestly? You guys are damaging our democracy as much as the Dem's socialist tendencies. Try listening. Try being a PART OF this society, instead of an angry outlier threatening to shoot people you disagree with. You know. Try behaving like a reasonable adult.

Save that kind of talk for when you're sitting in the cannibal's pot.

My assumption is that you want people to vote for Trump. I'm doing it, because I always vote against the liberal. Do you really think that acting like a star-struck kid is gonna help? Try a little honesty for a change. People like you scare other people away from the polls and contrary to what some of you seem to think...you can't win without them.

Wow. I'm so sorry people are scared away from polls based solely on words they read on the internet. Those people probably shouldn't be voting anyways due to a lack of intestinal fortitude to stand up for what they believe in. In fact, those pu$$ies were probably going to vote for Clinton anyways, so staying away from the polls is a good thing.

Obviously you haven't been scared out of voting based on what I post here.

You still don't get it. You got that info from the left media. I don't know anyone who dislikes Trump. You don't understand this is not a democracy.

Ringman feel free to post up some balanced media that shows Trump in a positive light ??

might be while I suspect as not alot of it exist you dopey dickwad

Trump's candidacy has already succeeded.

He's exposed the RINOs in the R party, the ones that claimed to be conservative.

He's exposed the pretend conservatives in the media, since by beatin ILLary, he's done so well they had to expose themselves to shill for the cuhunt.

And, he's exposed the fake conservatives and pussies on this forum.

As well as trolls you'd never have expected.

Winnin.

Bigly.

As a bonus, he's presented the Rorshach of those who are stupid enough to believe the propaganda set forth by the MSPM, as they repeat it endlessly here on the fire.

Sh|t v. Shinola? Never seen so many choose the sh|t.

Those stats are from a website that did 16 room-bookings in Trump hotels this year. But that's OK, you're a dumb f*ck pedo anyways.

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/10/19/ivanka-trump-media-vicious-family/

From the link: Ivanka said, “I will tell you that the media has been vicious and there’s a lot of business people in the room. We’ve had articles written about us by the business press where we say, hmm, that wasn’t exactly fair—the fact check—there’s a few things off, but this has been a different level. Look, we take it personally, obviously there’s some things said that are deeply personal, but on a less emotional example, this week, in the last couple days I saw on the front cover of The New York Times a story talking about how the Trump brand was being decimated due to the campaign. Our team had provided by statistics as it relates to our hotel company for example showing traffic patterns and actual analytics and data. They insisted on using quotes from random people. I have no idea where they called. They chose to use a booking engine that represented a total last year of 16 bookings.”

You don't get it kid. Elections aren't decided by people with an agenda. They are decided by people who get selected for juries because they have no bias or opinion. The kind that don't know anything about the candidates. The kind that get on the internet at the last minute and stumble into stupid.

OK. Keep making that mistake of thinking this is a regular old election where the republicans throw up the nicest loser they can find. It isn't. There's nowhere near as many undecided voters as you think there are this time.

Oh, and every single human has bias and opinion about EVERYTHING. It's how our brains evolved, simple psychology. But keep playing naive.

You can go bury your head in the sand or your wherever. We'll let you know when it's over and you can come up for air. Maybe there's a safe space you and dvd can go off to so you don't get offended?

I think Trumps biggest boost is going to come fom the "undecideds" in the fact that they will simply stay home instead of voting for Hillary.

Lot of "Dem lite" voters that can't stand the old scab.

Malfunctioning mic? Rigged presser?

When asked on NBC News how she saw the state of the race, Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s campaign manager, replied that “We are behind."

And a lot of pissed off bernie supporters, I saw a video of an old hippie chick screaming "TRUMPS GONNA FLATTEN YOU LIKE A PANCAKE HILLARY"

Mooner, that might've been true IF Trump had played the last few weeks right.

I know a lot of Democrats. Nobody is talking about how she sucks anymore. Trump has succeeded in energizing THAT base, too.

Such a [bleep] opportunity lost here guys. From a birds eye view inside the muddled middle, I can tell you, beyond a shadow of a doubt, this one was there to be had. 3 weeks ago. Ugh.

You've bought into the bullchit. Many have.

How else do you make sure you get your base out to vote? Saying you're up 20 will cause people to not take time off work to vote, to not spend $0.50 on a stamp to send in their ballot.

Probably. I wouldn't call them undecideds though. They were going to vote for the democrat until it was Hillary. But I got your drift loud and clear. And I think there's more than enough ABC voters out there that definitely want to ensure she's not at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. come 1/20/17.

For all you confused persons/ies:

ILLary "mobbed" in NC:



And, acourse, here's Podesta's email showin how to rig the fake polls in favor o' ILLary:

Now, for all of you out there who still aren't convinced that the polls are rigged, we present to you the following Podesta email, leaked earlier today, that conveniently spells out, in startling detail, exactly how to rig them. The email starts out with a request for recommendations on "oversamples for polling" in order to "maximize what we get out of our media polling."

I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.
The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations. In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:

Research, microtargeting & polling projects
- Over-sample Hispanics
- Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)
- Over-sample the Native American population
For Florida, the report recommends "consistently monitoring" samples to makes sure they're "not too old" and "has enough African American and Hispanic voters." Meanwhile, "independent" voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.

- Consistently monitor the sample to ensure it is not too old, and that it has enough African American and Hispanic voters to reflect the state.
- On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.
Meanwhile, it's suggested that national polls over sample "key districts / regions" and "ethnic" groups "as needed."

What a surprise.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...aybook-rigging-polls-through-oversamples