|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 126
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 126 |
One screw D&T'd will work just fine the other would end up going into the recess milled into the receiver for the ejector. It won't be able to grab even one thread. This sight is made to be mounted on the receiver. I'm trying to mount it as far back as can be done but that milled slot runs the entire length of the receiver. How did it get mounted back in the day?
If liberals knew what they were missing, they�d give up drugs, sex and rock-n-roll for shooting and hunting. But then the rest of us would never draw an elk tag, so to hell with 'em! � James "Mitch" Vilos aka (Pancho Vilos)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 126
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 126 |
Thank you Gene. I appreciate your help.
If liberals knew what they were missing, they�d give up drugs, sex and rock-n-roll for shooting and hunting. But then the rest of us would never draw an elk tag, so to hell with 'em! � James "Mitch" Vilos aka (Pancho Vilos)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,124
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,124 |
Don't do it!
Redfield 102s are crappy sights and since they require 2 holes to be d&t into the left side of the receiver, they are value killers. If you want to shoot a peep sight, buy a style from Lyman/Redfield/Williams that was designed to fit factory d&t holes. Better, finer, windage and elevation adjustments, and no extra non-factory holes to d&t.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,469
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,469 |
Don't do it!
Redfield 102s are crappy sights and since they require 2 holes to be d&t into the left side of the receiver, they are value killers. If you want to shoot a peep sight, buy a style from Lyman/Redfield/Williams that was designed to fit factory d&t holes. Better, finer, windage and elevation adjustments, and no extra non-factory holes to d&t. There's a proper Redfield receiver sight for sale on this sight now. As 260 says, it's a deal breaker and a value breaker. Don't do it. I have a NOS 102 in the box with the drill template for my Remington 141 that I bought in ignorance. I will never use it. Plus, on the 102 the adjustments are opposing screws, not micrometer clicks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,068
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,068 |
I agree with the notion about not drilling and tapping the receiver needlessly. I will disagree with the notion that the 102 is a bad sight. For a target shooter, the lack of repeatable screw/click adjustments is a non-starter, but for a hunter it's not that bad. I have used sights with primitive adjustments like which is on these, and once zero-ing is achieved one simply cinches down the screws and forgets about them. If said user fools around with multiple loads then they become a problem again, but if it's a once a year rifleman/hunter who shoots one load they are a very usable sight.
I had two Krags along the way that had Redfield 102 No-Drill sights on them and they functioned just fine.
"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz "Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,290
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,290 |
Yeah, the 102 is fine within its intended context of hunting. Lyman made a similar sight for the Super Sporters and others and they seem to be fine for their intended purposes too. I wouldn't drill an unmolested rifle for one, but I don't think that I'd turn my nose up at a 99 that had been previously drilled for a 102, especially if the price was right. Functionally, it's not a bad idea.
Last edited by S99VG; 10/23/16.
"The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle." John Stapp - "Stapp's Law" "Klaatu barada nikto"
|
|
|
|
663 members (10ring1, 1234, 19rabbit52, 1badf350, 007FJ, 12344mag, 58 invisible),
2,772
guests, and
1,311
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,694
Posts18,456,642
Members73,909
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|