|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,325
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,325 |
I'm considering buying a new Chiappa 1892 in .44 Rem magnum to use exclusively with cast bullets. A previous bad experience with a Marlin .44 with a very oversized bore (0.432") has made me cautious. Has anyone slugged the bore of a Chiappa .44?
Last edited by castnblast; 02/05/17. Reason: fixed typo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,325
Campfire Regular
|
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,325 |
nobody has slugged the bore of a Chiappa?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,070
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,070 |
Would the bore diameter of one, be the same for all? Just asking
If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,325
Campfire Regular
|
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,325 |
I'm not sure about that, I suspect there might be some variation even between the same manufacturers barrels. Marlins however are pretty famous for having barrels that slug .431-.433" depending on who is doing the measurements. I want something closer to the supposed minimum spec of .429-.430"
|
|
|
|
|
625 members (160user, 10Glocks, 1beaver_shooter, 10gaugemag, 06hunter59, 1Akshooter, 63 invisible),
2,638
guests, and
1,197
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,256
Posts18,467,037
Members73,925
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
