24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 11,263
RickBin Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 11,263
Hi Guys:

I am pleased to direct you to the new article on the Home Page, "BINOCULAR BASICS, PART ONE: MANUFACTURING" by John Barsness (Mule Deer).

Please use this thread to ask questions about the article, and I look forward to the next installment.

Thanks, John!


"What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as freedom should not be highly rated." Thomas Paine
BP-B2

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 474
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 474
John,

I really enjoyed this article. Have you ever had someone "not" agree that a particular set of binos were really good? That they thought what you believed to be a lesser set were better than one you thought was really good?

I have a 2nd job at an outdoor retailer in the optics dept. One thing I have noticed over the years is that not everyone "sees" the same details with binoculars.

Many customers that come in looking at binoculars cannot see the optical differences in high end glass and mid-range glass. Some have stated that they see no difference between a $300 set of Nikons or Leupolds, and a set of Swarovski SLC's (?). This has happened too many times over the years to be a fluke to me.

On the other hand, when young military pilots come in and compare binoculars they immediately see details in the glass that most do not. I am convinced that if one has excellent eyesight to begin with - they have a different viewing experience than the average person with average to poor eyesight, despite the fact that one can focus binoculars to obtain a clear sight picture.

I always encourage to try as many different brands as you can, because we all see things a bit differently. What may be clear and bright to me may not give you the same experience.

Just curious if you have noticed the same thing?

Mark

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,898
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,898
Oh, yeah, eyesight makes a big difference!

One of the things that happens as we get older is the pupils of our eyes don't open up as much in dim light. As a result, the advantage of larger exit pupils in binoculars is reduced, especially in dim light, because smaller eye-pupils can't take advantage of the "extra" light.

That's is pretty well-known, but another aspect of smaller eye-pupils is they tend to sharpen the view slightly, especially around the edges of the field of view--exactly like a smaller lens aperture in a camera sharpens the edges, and for the same reason: It reduces the amount of "edge" light, the rays that come in through the edges of the lens, which are deflected the most, both due to their distance from the center of the lens, and the interference of the lens mount.

However, this doesn't help the overall sharpness of older eyes. Instead it just reduces the difference in the perception of sharpness through optics.

Eyes also vary considerably in how they perceive color. One result is a lens system that emphasizes one color over another may look sharper to one person, and not to another.

There are other differences as well, the reason I try to gather several people now and then to look through a bunch of binoculars. It's always good to get a broader spectrum of opinions.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,102
RSY Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,102
I recently bought a Leupold BX-1 McKenzie binocular. Seem like a nicely made unit, but they're not quite as sharp as I expected.

I know they're the bottom of the Leupold line, but it seems like my 20+ year-old porro prism Minolta mini's are significantly crisper.

Do these BX-1s have adequate correction coatings?

Scott

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,898
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,898
Apparently not.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
IC B2

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,810
D
djs Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,810
JB, I have a pair of Pentax 8X43 SP DCF binoculars. They are well made, but the image has a yellowish tint. Any explanation for this?

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,898
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,898
Might just be the way you see color, combined with the lenses on that particular model. Human eyesight varies considerably in that regard. Do other people see the same yellow tint?

The binocular also might be made that way to enhance the view in certain light conditions, common in many optics these days.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
O
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Oh, yeah, eyesight makes a big difference!

One of the things that happens as we get older is the pupils of our eyes don't open up as much in dim light. As a result, the advantage of larger exit pupils in binoculars is reduced, especially in dim light, because smaller eye-pupils can't take advantage of the "extra" light.

That's is pretty well-known, but another aspect of smaller eye-pupils is they tend to sharpen the view slightly, especially around the edges of the field of view--exactly like a smaller lens aperture in a camera sharpens the edges, and for the same reason: It reduces the amount of "edge" light, the rays that come in through the edges of the lens, which are deflected the most, both due to their distance from the center of the lens, and the interference of the lens mount.

However, this doesn't help the overall sharpness of older eyes. Instead it just reduces the difference in the perception of sharpness through optics.

Eyes also vary considerably in how they perceive color. One result is a lens system that emphasizes one color over another may look sharper to one person, and not to another.

There are other differences as well, the reason I try to gather several people now and then to look through a bunch of binoculars. It's always good to get a broader spectrum of opinions.


John, I'm retired and a senior with old eyes....
Before reading your info, above, I didn't understand why a 300-dollar nikon monarch 5 was every-bit-as-good (to my eyes) as a 1000-European binocular.
So, by growing old, I have saved myself 700 bucks and am just as happy.
This is way-better than social-security.
:-)

OldCrab


“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.”
--- Will Rogers

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
643 members (1badf350, 09wingates, 2003and2013, 007FJ, 160user, 67 invisible), 2,625 guests, and 1,169 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,601
Posts18,398,282
Members73,817
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.487s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8279 MB (Peak: 0.9028 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-28 13:26:00 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS