|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,440
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,440 |
I was checking out the new Hornady #10 manual for 338 RCM load data and noticed that the published load data for the 338 RCM is less than the 338-06.
This baffles me as the RCM case can hold more water (3-4 more grains) and is equivalent to the 338-06 Improved.
Hornady shows in most instances heavier powder loads for the '06 case over the RCM case.
Why is that? Is this a SAAMI thing?
With case capacities being pretty much the same I would expect to use either or load data for each case.
Which also begs the question...Does case design matter? I would think no, but?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831 |
Likely cause most RCM rifles are based off 20" barrels while the 338-06 in most load books is in a 24" barrel.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,440
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,440 |
Likely cause most RCM rifles are based off 20" barrels while the 338-06 in most load books is in a 24" barrel. Yes, (20" verses 23") but the powder charges listed are LESS for the RCM case. Doesn't make sense, especially when you look at Hornady Factory loads are loaded pretty stiff and getting quite the speeds. http://www.hornady.com/store/338-RCM-200-gr-SST-Superformance/Listed factory load of 2,950 mv for a 200 grain bullet compared to the Load Guide of 2,850 mv. That just tells me they CAN load a higher pressure load. I'm very impressed with this rifle/cartridge concept.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,270
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,270 |
It is unfortunate there is little load data for this fun and very useful round.
I have two 338 RCMs. The sporter has a 22" barrel and once I came across this load I quit. I use the 225 gr accubond with 61 gr of RL-17 for 2775 fps.Mag box is 2.950", bullet seated accordingly. Super accurate, and has taken four cow elk to date. Would be more but hard to get an Az tag.
FYI the reamer is the exact copy of the one Hornady designed. I know because I had a conversation with Lonny before he retired.
The other is a LA Mark X that used the same reamer then a throating reamer was used to allow a longer OAL with 300 gr Bergers. This package has a 1 in 9 twist 30" barrel uses 56 gr of RL-17 for 2525 fps.
Hope this helps
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,440
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,440 |
Thank you!
I have some 225 AB's I'll try out.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,908
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,908 |
61 Gr of RL 17 std primer, with 225 gr N Part. or N Accubond or Horn Interlock, bullets was the load I settled on in my 2 338 RCM,s. 20" barrels 2625 FPS Average about 1" in both rifles.
Keep hearing bad things about the Hornady 225 SST bullets being to soft, but they are accurate and fast in the factory load about 2690 FPS. Any real exp. with the 225 SST? Bought several boxes when brass was hard to find.
kk alaska
Alaska 7 months of winter then 5 months of tourists
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748 |
I'll have to check my book, but I seem to recall 61gr RL17 was exactly what I ran with my 338-06 and 225 ABs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831 |
61 grains is what got me 2690 fps in my 21" barrel 338-06
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,908
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,908 |
Have had ejector marks with Factory Hornady 225 Gr SST loads in my 20" 338 RCM very accurate.
No marks with my reloads with 225 GR loads about 2625 FPS in my 20" 338 RCM, any faster and was not as accurate.
kk alaska
Alaska 7 months of winter then 5 months of tourists
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,440
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,440 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 590
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 590 |
There could be differences in throating, etc. However, in checking my Hornady #9, there was no clear trend. Some loads were almost equal, some a bit heavier for one or the other cartridge. The biggest differences seemed to be for the 225 gr loads. As usual, I check different manuals and in this case both sets of Hornady data, and then start a bit low, watching the expansion at the pressure ring carefully as I work up to max.
NRA Benefactor Life Member NAHC Life Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,440
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,440 |
Revisiting this as I bought a 22" Ruger Hawkeye.
This little round is a good one.
|
|
|
211 members (12344mag, 160user, 257 roberts, 257robertsimp, 257 mag, 10Glocks, 22 invisible),
1,881
guests, and
854
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,187,728
Posts18,400,793
Members73,822
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|