24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
65BR Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Heard Lapua was or will be making 6CM brass.

Is the CM as accurate as the 47 and XC ?

GB1

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,065
M
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,065
There's so little difference in the basic form and powder capacity of all three I seriously doubt there's a measurable difference in accuracy, everything else being equal.

The only difference might lie in small-rifle primers Lapua seems to be addicted to. But David Tubb, who developed the 6XC, claims experiments have proven that any case using over 35 grains of powder is more accurate with large-rifle primers. I've been trying to track that down and haven't been able to, though must admit I haven't had time to lean into it very hard. However, would tend to give serious consideration to anything Tubb says.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
65BR Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Thanks John. I figured that would be the case, of splitting hairs, as us Looney's like to do smile

Good point on the primers. Tubb has quite a bit to draw from so no doubt he might know. Seen a piece by G. Salazar years ago, using 308 small primer brass vs LR brass. Cannot recall if he was using straight 30, or another version like the 260 or 7/08, but basically he saw no net benefit. That said others might differ in their opinion, and/or experience. Results do vary - for many reasons as we know. I do believe there must be some merit in the "LR is better over x grains of powder" adage, as their must be a point of diminished returns on accuracy, and perhaps at that point or near it, one might get insufficient spark on larger capacity rounds. Bore size might well matter as could a few variables such as case design/shape.

I have seen many debate the "What's better the XC or 47" by competitive 6 shooters, but was not clear if that was ever settled. The Creedmoor should be another horse in the race. My hat is off to Hornady, and those arms makers who support quality R&D, and bring good affordable choices to market.

Thanks again Sir.

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,004
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,004
I only own the '47 and it is extremely forgiving with load development. My two rifles shoot everything well. YMMV
Matt


How do you know a Trump hater? They'll tell you.
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
65BR Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Matt, that's mirrored my experience with the 6.5 version, along with the 6BR. One of my past Smith's was a top comp shooter, and used the 47. It would be interesting in knowing his results if he used the XC and CM in identical platforms and ammo quality, etc. Surely would be close. I see the Lapua CM brass is more expensive than 47. Wish I had stock in Lapua! Lol.

Matt - what bullets do you often use, and any idea on barrel life. Shooting competition? Obviously a comp shooter gets them hotter....

IC B2


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

700 members (160user, 1234, 10ring1, 16penny, 10Glocks, 10gaugeman, 62 invisible), 2,548 guests, and 1,172 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,140
Posts18,464,891
Members73,925
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.104s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8070 MB (Peak: 0.8525 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-24 00:51:41 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS