|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715 |
I've got a Rem 700 in 338 Win Mag. and I'm wanting to use a Warne "Mountain Tech" aluminum rail with the Warne fixed steel rings, to mount a Bushnell Elite 4200 3-9x40.
Is there any issue with using the steel rings on top of the aluminum rail?
I use the these same Warne rings for everything, but normally I just go with the steel two piece bases. However in this case I'd like to have the rail so I can have more adjustment in the positioning of the scope.
I know Warne also makes a quality steel rail but the price doesn't agree with my budget. I did send a message to Warne asking the same question but haven't heard back yet. So I'd be interested to hear opinions from people on here, and possibly what might be a better option, if there are any.
Looking to spend $100 or less for both the base and the rings.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,153
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,153 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,006
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,006 |
Weaver makes a decent rail , with recoil lug ........ will run you less than the Warne
add weaver 4 hole rings and you got a pretty solid setup for less than $100
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715 |
Thank you, guys. I did look into the Weaver rail. That was a good suggestion but I ended up finding both the Warne rail and the Warne rings on eBay, and ordered both. Total was $75. I also received an email from Corey at Warne and he said their steel rings on their aluminum rail wouldn't be a problem.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 |
Zeiss branded aluminum Warne style rings are also available.
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 |
I haven't said it yet, but as my posts might imply, I prefer to not mount steel rings to Aluminum Weaver or Picatinny bases. I've got no issues with the inverse.
That said, watch your torque settings and you'll be fine.
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715 |
The Tru Tac and the Zeiss rings both look like good options. I'll keep those in mind for next time.
I ordered the low Warne fixed rings. My scope is a 3-9x40 (1" tube) so there won't be a lot of extra room but I'm hoping it will work. The Warne lows are more like mediums in most other brands.
I'll be sure to be careful and use the proper torque on all screws!
Last edited by bdan68; 03/27/17.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,340
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,340 |
I mount Warne steel rings on aluminum EGW bases frequently and have never had an issue. If you call Warne instead of Email you will get prompt service.
Don't roll those bloodshot eyes at me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715 |
They were actually pretty quick getting back to me. I sent the message Sunday afternoon, and I got an email reply from Warne at 11:43 Monday morning.
|
|
|
|
613 members (10gaugeman, 1_deuce, 222Sako, 222ND, 10Glocks, 1234, 71 invisible),
2,617
guests, and
1,272
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,669
Posts18,455,977
Members73,909
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|