#1376716 - 04/16/07 06:55 PM
Re: McMillan Fill Weights: The Official Policy!
[Re: leftybolt]
|
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 12/13/04
Posts: 8067
Loc: Northern Louisiana
|
Weight on a new swirl pattern Remington Classic with SA BDL action inlet, 1" Decelerator, and magnum barrel channel: 32.25oz
_________________________
I cannot spell, just so you know.....
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1423194 - 05/09/07 04:51 PM
Re: McMillan Fill Weights: The Official Policy!
[Re: leftybolt]
|
Campfire Ranger
Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 1944
Loc: Central Cal.
|
I read an old Dogzapper article dating back to 1997 and he referred to a "Canadian Fill" McM stock. That was a new one for me.
_________________________
Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms: Should be a convenience store, not a government agency!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1423200 - 05/09/07 04:54 PM
Re: McMillan Fill Weights: The Official Policy!
[Re: Grand]
|
Campfire Kahuna Emeritus &
Campfire Tracker
Registered: 03/19/03
Posts: 7280
|
I read an old Dogzapper article dating back to 1997 and he referred to a "Canadian Fill" McM stock. That was a new one for me. And I have absolutely no freakin' idea what "Canadian Fill" is. I was simply repeating the words of a gunsmith I was using at the time (Darrell Holland). He was high on that fill and I accepted him at his word. Steve
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1425625 - 05/11/07 12:36 AM
Re: McMillan Fill Weights: The Official Policy!
[Re: dogzapper]
|
Campfire Ranger
Registered: 11/14/05
Posts: 1944
Loc: Central Cal.
|
Dogzapper: Maybe Darrell was talking about Whisky? Thats the only Canadian Fill I know.
Hey BTW, I peaked under the skin of the Holland 7-08AI I bought last year from your friend Steve, and to my surprise there is a Blue McSquirrely underneath.
Edited by Dirtybob1 (05/11/07 12:36 AM)
_________________________
Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms: Should be a convenience store, not a government agency!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1474763 - 06/07/07 08:35 PM
Re: McMillan Fill Weights: The Official Policy!
[Re: Grand]
|
Campfire Tracker
Registered: 03/09/06
Posts: 7418
Loc: Deer Park, Tx
|
Rick, I guess I may be stirring the pot somewhat with my comment and inquiry. You told me some time back that the Edge could very likely be inletted for my Wby MK V. I did not take you up on the offer because there is no place I can go to handle one of these or any other McMillan for that matter. Eventually, the Wby was custom stocked by Match Grade Arms in Spring, Tx. The design chosen was the 700 Classic, no cheek piece. My stock weighs 20 ounces. I really like it. That was the comment, now for the inquiry: Is there someway one could obtain a McM of a certain design simply to handle it and then return it? I am very interested in the Mountain Rifle stock JPro posted a pic of for my 3 Rem's. I would want to handle it, however, before I plunk down my "sawmill dollars."
_________________________
"Love God, love your neighbor, hunt. Raise your kids, make them behave, love them. I don't see the down side to that." Phil Robertson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1475501 - 06/08/07 09:01 AM
Re: McMillan Fill Weights: The Official Policy!
[Re: Reloder28]
|
Campfire Ranger
Registered: 03/07/06
Posts: 1591
Loc: Houston, TX
|
Reloder28, If you don't find a solution with Ric, I have some McMillan's you are welcome to come over and handle. I currently have rifles stocked with a McMillan Sporter and a McMillan Classic plus I have a McMillan Mountain Rifle pattern that doesn't have an action in it as yet. Paul
_________________________
NRA Endowment Member
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1475510 - 06/08/07 09:11 AM
Re: McMillan Fill Weights: The Official Policy!
[Re: Reloder28]
|
Campfire Outfitter
Registered: 12/13/04
Posts: 8067
Loc: Northern Louisiana
|
FWIW, I have also had the factory Remington Mountain Rifle stocks and they feel the same dimensionally as the McMillan. With the exception of some of the outsourced fiberglass handles, most of the 700 stocks that Remington has used in the past fit me well.
Edited by JPro (06/08/07 09:11 AM) Edit Reason: spelling
_________________________
I cannot spell, just so you know.....
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1475532 - 06/08/07 09:25 AM
Re: McMillan Fill Weights: The Official Policy!
[Re: Reloder28]
|
Campfire Regular
Registered: 01/08/06
Posts: 555
Loc: Salt River Basin
|
I wrote McMillan last year if they inletted patterns other than their Weatherby models for the Mark V action. Their answer was no, with the exception of the tacticals & the HTG.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1476226 - 06/08/07 04:44 PM
Re: McMillan Fill Weights: The Official Policy!
[Re: JAC43]
|
Member
Registered: 12/03/06
Posts: 124
Loc: 21 n 167 w
|
Did you say a MK V action in an HTG?
_________________________
"It's better to be lucky than good"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1809755 - 11/19/07 10:43 AM
Re: McMillan Fill Weights: The Official Policy!
[Re: RickBin]
|
New Member
Registered: 11/19/07
Posts: 1
|
I regards to Bansners vs. McMillan I have both stocks and can say that McMillan in my opionion is the better option. Both stocks are much better than factory, however, I personally have a problem with a stock that lacks checkering and is slick. As much as i love the Mark Bansner rifle I hate the fact that on cold damp mornings that the stock seems very slippery. Other than this the stock is ridged and of high quality.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|