CLICK HERE for $200 INSTANT SAVING - ANSWER THE CHALLENGE!

Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#2926838 - 03/31/09 01:58 PM Re: 300 win mag 180 vs. 200 and 220.gr? [Re: BobinNH]
Bob33 Offline
Campfire Regular

Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 452
Loc: WA
Use whichever good bullet shoots best, with a preference to 180 grains. I've used 200 grains on elk and moose, and 180 grains on elk, and they both tasted pretty good to me (the animals, not the bullets). Seriously, there's no reason not to have complete confidence in a good 180 grain, but if you like other weights go ahead and use them.

Top
#2926865 - 03/31/09 02:12 PM Re: 300 win mag 180 vs. 200 and 220.gr? [Re: pdxhunter]
rflshtr Offline
Campfire Ranger

Registered: 03/23/06
Posts: 1523
Loc: Twin Cities, MN
I prefer 200 grain partitions with Retumbo powder in mine. Check out Hodgdon web site for recommended loads. I believe the 200 grain Nosler bullets are slightly better ballistically than the 180 grain Nosler bullets. Good all around load at near 3000 fps.

Top
#2927055 - 03/31/09 03:47 PM Re: 300 win mag 180 vs. 200 and 220.gr? [Re: rflshtr]
ULA65 Offline
Member

Registered: 10/24/08
Posts: 92
Loc: MN
The 200gr accubond with a b.c. of .588, I think you would be hard pressed to find a better bullet. Any other opinions out there?

Top
#2927101 - 03/31/09 04:15 PM Re: 300 win mag 180 vs. 200 and 220.gr? [Re: BobinNH]
tx270 Offline
Campfire Ranger

Registered: 10/31/06
Posts: 2216
Loc: central texas
 Originally Posted By: BobinNH
You said the rifle likes 180's.Save the time,trouble,and component cost.Shoot a cheap 180 for practice,a good 180 for hunting.Load a pile of ammo with the cheap bullet and learn the load well.Other bullet weights are embelishment.

In a 300 mag for big game hunting,if you cannot get it done with a quality 180,you will likely not get it done with anything else.


I agree.

180's, shoot plenty flat at long range deer, elk, or anything else. Doesn't kick quite as much as 200's or 220's (splitting hairs on recoil, I know, but there is a difference)

Packs plenty of wallop to take anything a 300 WM was intended to take.

If you loaded youself I would say, sure, play around with it........or I may not.

Bill

Top
#2927205 - 03/31/09 05:00 PM Re: 300 win mag 180 vs. 200 and 220.gr? [Re: tx270]
fishdog52 Offline
Campfire Regular

Registered: 06/18/06
Posts: 1234
Loc: Finger Lakes NY
The bottom line is that a good 30 cal bullet is an effective killer. It was an awesome event when the 30-30 hit the market, it was improved when the 06 came along, & ditto for all the mag versions. I think the 308 is often underestimated for its honest effectiveness in the field, let alone a good shot with a 300 mag.
Any of the weights you mentioned will get the job done on just about everything. I would happily hunt a 300 Mag using whichever one the rifle performed best with.
If a quarry needs more killin', move into an AFrame, TSX, etc..
_________________________
Politicians, above all else, value survival.

Top
#2927343 - 03/31/09 06:05 PM Re: 300 win mag 180 vs. 200 and 220.gr? [Re: BobinNH]
jorgeI Online   content
Campfire Kahuna

Registered: 06/20/03
Posts: 21204
Loc: Orange Park, Florida
 Originally Posted By: BobinNH
You said the rifle likes 180's.Save the time,trouble,and component cost.Shoot a cheap 180 for practice,a good 180 for hunting.Load a pile of ammo with the cheap bullet and learn the load well.Other bullet weights are embelishment.

In a 300 mag for big game hunting,if you cannot get it done with a quality 180,you will likely not get it done with anything else.


Spot on. jorge
_________________________
Originally Posted By: Cossatotjoe_redux
Whatever, immigrant.

Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy,it's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. WLS Churchill

Top
#2928863 - 04/01/09 09:45 AM Re: 300 win mag 180 vs. 200 and 220.gr? [Re: pdxhunter]
Tonk Offline
Campfire Guide

Registered: 03/28/09
Posts: 3090
Loc: Chicago, Ill.
pdxhunter, I have owned at least 4 .300 mags over the years and love the caliber for knock down killing ability and long range accuracy out to 450 yards. I draw the line on that distance for myself on animal.

Most of thoes rifles prefered 180 grain or 190 grain bullets! Yes, they did shoot the 165 ok (1.5 avg. MOA at 100 yds) as I recall. The 200 grains shot better, those being Hornady, Sierra, Nosler's and Speer. I tried the Barnes X bullet but only one rifle would shoot those 180 grainers less than 2-MOA. Remington factory ammo was used in the 180 grn and shot under 1.5 MOA.
Winchester Silver Tips in 220 grain shot around 1.5 MOA in all guns at 100 yds.

Darn near all of them did shoot the 220 grains very well up to around 200 yards....distance I picked to test them. All those rifles shot 220 bullets at least 1.5 or better. These would be my pick if hunting moose in grizz country.

I would start with a bullet weight your most likely to use on the game that you plan on hunting and then either purchase several boxes of various factory brands or pick out the bullets and let your friend load them up for you. This is the only way (trial & error) that you will know exactly what your rifle shoots best ok.


Edited by NRA (04/01/09 09:48 AM)
_________________________
Thank Our Veterans!
GOD Bless Them All

UNIONS BUILDING AMERICA, SALUTE ALL THE UNION TRADESMAN


Top
#2928902 - 04/01/09 10:01 AM Re: 300 win mag 180 vs. 200 and 220.gr? [Re: Tonk]
pdxhunter Offline
Campfire Regular

Registered: 06/04/08
Posts: 270
Loc: North Portland OREGON
Thanks guys. Great info. You guys said what I was thinking. Stick with it it ant broke. I ll stick with 180's. They have done the job on the last 3 elk that have came my way.

Top
#2929827 - 04/01/09 05:01 PM Re: 300 win mag 180 vs. 200 and 220.gr? [Re: Bob33]
BobinNH Offline
Campfire Oracle

Registered: 01/28/07
Posts: 28019
Bob: I've used the 165,180, and 200 as well.All are very good and it's tough to find a bad weight.These days i stick to one bullet per rifle, or try to....but that's the beauty of a 300;lotsa weights work well.
_________________________
Just because I'm not listening...doesn't mean I'm not paying attention.

Top
#2931091 - 04/02/09 07:52 AM Re: 300 win mag 180 vs. 200 and 220.gr? [Re: pdxhunter]
Shadow Offline
Campfire Regular

Registered: 03/04/01
Posts: 395
Loc: Louisburg, NC 27549
pdxhunter,

You gotten good advise, a 180 gr in a 300 mag case is never a bad choice. That said I have had very good luck with 200 grain and 220 grain Nosler Partitions in any 300 mag case.

My very best accuracy (using hunting not match bullets) have come from 300 mags (300 win mag or 30-338) using the old 200 grain Semi-spitzer partitions (not made any more), and the newer 220 gr Nosler Partition semi RN. I don't know why but the 1-10 twist, and around 2700 to 2800 FPS works like magic.

Now what can you do with 220 grain bullets in a 300 mag. that you cannot do with a 180?? Not much, but consider the following:

I once shot a deer running at about 75 yds, with a 30-338 and 200 grain Semi-Sptz Nosler Partition. I shot and the deer dropped. On walking over I realized I shot through a 3" sapling and nailed the deer on the other side. Would a 180 have worked as well, yeah maybe. And Barnes X's were not yet invented.

I went to Africa a few years back, and used a Win Mod 70 SS in 300 win mag as my light rifle. I had two loads worked up: Nosler 220 Partitions, and Barnes 220 gr solids, both over H1000. They made a nice and deadly combo. Granted that was a limited and once in a lifetime application.

As far a recoil goes, I find 200-220 grains bullets in a 300 mag to be very mild shooting. By now you must be thinking this guy is crazy, 220 from a 300 mag will recoil more than a 180 gr going 300 FPS or more faster? WEll yes and no. Most people forget that recoil comes in two components: Pure recoil that is felt on your shoulder, and then there is recoil velocity, which is the speed it comes back. So a 180 grainer at 3100 FPS slaps your shoulder, where as a 220 grainer at 2750 pushes it. I am more sensitive to recoil velocity than pure recoil myself, and many other shooters are the same.

Another example is a 375 H&H Mag. People that have never shot one always remark after their first firing, "well that was not bad, the recoil was more a shove than a slap". Well a 300 grain bullet out of a 375 H&H moving at around 2550 FPS does indeed shove and not slap. That is the combination of high FP of Recoil and low recoil velocity.

Now if you are planning on using your 300 mag at long ranges, 300 yds plus, by all means develop and use 180 to 200 grain bullets. On the other hand, if your hunting somewhere that the trees and cover are thick, and shots planned are well less than 300 yds, and your quarry weighs more than 500 lbs. Then try the 220 grainers. I think you will astonished at how well they perform in those situations.

Best of luck,

Bob
_________________________

Top
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >


Moderator:  RickBin, SYSOP 
CLICK HERE for GREAT DEALS on VORTEX OPTICS at CAMERA LAND!
Support Our Sponsors 1
Who's Online
382 registered (10ring1, 12344mag, 1899guy, 19rabbit52, 18sgd99, 1990stanggt, 35 invisible), 1125 Guests and 282 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Support Our Sponsors 2
Forum Stats
50240 Members
72 Forums
628907 Topics
9016042 Posts

Max Online: 4366 @ 10/05/10 09:36 AM
Support Our Sponsors 3









Copyright 2000-2013 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.