Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3435290 - 10/30/09 12:46 PM Ruger M77 vs M77 Mark II vs M77 Hawkeye
SUPERDIESEL1 Offline
Member

Registered: 09/29/09
Posts: 85
Loc: Westminster, CO.
Anyone prefer the tang safety on the old M77 over the newer style flip lever on the M77 Mark II?

Also What is the difference between the M77 Mark II and the Hawkeye?

What's you preference between these and why?
_________________________
Some go through life wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem. Ronald Regan

My Longest shot is my shortest stalk. USMC 83-87

Top
HR 468
CLICK HERE for GREAT DEALS on SWAROVSKI OPTICS at CAMERA LAND!
#3435559 - 10/30/09 02:20 PM Re: Ruger M77 vs M77 Mark II vs M77 Hawkeye [Re: SUPERDIESEL1]
43Shooter Offline
Campfire Ranger

Registered: 05/28/08
Posts: 1793
IMO the main difference is the Hawkeye stock. It's a lighter, better handling stock with wrap around forearm checkering. I bought one for my MKII and think it's an improvement.

Top
#3435599 - 10/30/09 02:37 PM Re: Ruger M77 vs M77 Mark II vs M77 Hawkeye [Re: 43Shooter]
noKnees Online   content
Campfire Guide

Registered: 11/09/05
Posts: 4426
Loc: johnstown, NY/Bloomfield CT
Mixed feelings on the tang safety VS wing safety. One is faster the other is perhaps more secure.

The wood hawkeyes have a better stock. As for me all my MKIIs are stainless and they are slowly becomimg Mcmillianized.
_________________________
The collection of taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to public welfare, is only a species of legalized larceny. Under this Republic the rewards of industry belong to those who earn them. Coolidge

Top
#3435673 - 10/30/09 03:02 PM Re: Ruger M77 vs M77 Mark II vs M77 Hawkeye [Re: SUPERDIESEL1]
222Rem Offline
Campfire Outfitter

Registered: 01/26/05
Posts: 7777
Loc: Eastern, OR
I've got samples from all three generations. There are pros and cons to each-----for me anyway. In no particular order, I prefer the MkII and newer barrels, the tang-safety blued bolt handles and red recoil pad, and the Hawkeye stock profile and trigger. The matte vs. shiny metal is a toss-up.

So for me, the features and availability point to the Hawkeye being the winner of the three versions.
_________________________

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance,and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery"
-- Winston Churchill

Top
#3435747 - 10/30/09 03:36 PM Re: Ruger M77 vs M77 Mark II vs M77 Hawkeye [Re: 222Rem]
cumminscowboy Offline
Campfire Guide

Registered: 11/11/04
Posts: 3004
Loc: Herriman UT
I think the 3 POS safety is a big upgrade and like it a lot, its way more safe. I don't care for the bead blasted bolt as it makes the action feel rougher, they should have left that in the white. another that I never see mentioned is I like how the original models bottom metal opened with the release in the bow, the mk 2 bottom metal is hard to release forget about doing it with gloves.
_________________________
Most Wanted Disaster Services
http://mwcleanup.com

Top
#3436576 - 10/30/09 08:10 PM Re: Ruger M77 vs M77 Mark II vs M77 Hawkeye [Re: cumminscowboy]
hotsoup Offline
Campfire Tracker

Registered: 11/06/05
Posts: 5464
i used a tang wood/blue in 270 win from 72'-73' until 96', for everything in alaska (except' brown bear) and never had an issue. now use a wood/blue 30-06, also without any issues. i have handled and shot a couple hawkeyes, but don't own one. i prefer the tang safety but like the improved locking capabilities of the 3 pos. safety on the 2 newer versions. all 3 wood stock versions suite me as well. the mk2 stainless is a little too bright for me, and since i prefer blued, never gave much consideration to the newer s/s version. you should be able to find a ruger to meets your needs and expectations. they are well made rifles!

Top
#3436592 - 10/30/09 08:16 PM Re: Ruger M77 vs M77 Mark II vs M77 Hawkeye [Re: hotsoup]
SUPERDIESEL1 Offline
Member

Registered: 09/29/09
Posts: 85
Loc: Westminster, CO.
Good info. The tang safety was my dads as well (owner of Front Range Gunsmithing in CO. where I worked from '76-89'). He loves the added safety of the Mark II but still prefers the original (like the No.1s & No.3s).
_________________________
Some go through life wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem. Ronald Regan

My Longest shot is my shortest stalk. USMC 83-87

Top
#3436618 - 10/30/09 08:26 PM Re: Ruger M77 vs M77 Mark II vs M77 Hawkeye [Re: SUPERDIESEL1]
Steelhead Offline
Campfire Oracle

Registered: 10/17/02
Posts: 66407
Loc: Retired
I like the ergonomics of the Hawkeye the best, though I do have a few tangs around.
_________________________
20 years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs. Please God, don't take Kevin Bacon.


Top
#3437017 - 10/31/09 01:14 AM Re: Ruger M77 vs M77 Mark II vs M77 Hawkeye [Re: SUPERDIESEL1]
Big Stick Offline
Campfire Oracle

Registered: 01/25/01
Posts: 37222
Loc: Paradise,Alaska
I'd prefer a stainless steel tang,due to the adjustable trigger..................
_________________________
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."

Top
#3447859 - 11/03/09 01:05 PM Re: Ruger M77 vs M77 Mark II vs M77 Hawkeye [Re: SUPERDIESEL1]
Retsof Offline
Campfire Regular

Registered: 06/30/03
Posts: 338
I've never owned a Hawkeye, so I'll have to defer to those with experience. Many years ago, I had a Ruger 77 w/tang safety and liked it, though I also like the 3-position safety on my current Ruger MK II. As others have stated, the 3-position safety is, well, safer. Though the tang safety is faster to manipulate, the newer 3-position safety has not yet cost me a game animal. I bought my MK II in Spring of 2005 and for awhile releasing the floorplate was an exercise in futility with or without gloves. However, over time and with repeated use, this has ceased to be a problem. Regarding stocks, the first thing I did, when I got my MK II, was replace the factory stock with a Hogue. It's not that I necessarily disliked the factory stock but that I really like the Hogue synthetic stocks, which fit me perfectly (especially the wide forearm). YMMV.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >


Moderator:  RickBin, SYSOP 
CLICK HERE for GREAT DEALS on STEINER OPTICS at CAMERA LAND!
Support Our Sponsors 1
Who's Online
687 registered (10pointer, 12344mag, 16gauge, 10gaugemag, 01Foreman400, 10generation, 68 invisible), 1598 Guests and 337 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Support Our Sponsors 2
CLICK HERE for LEUPOLD VX6 OPTICS at CAMERA LAND!
Forum Stats
50456 Members
72 Forums
634040 Topics
9095798 Posts

Max Online: 4366 @ 10/05/10 09:36 AM
Support Our Sponsors 3









Copyright 2000-2013 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.