24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 387
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 387
Please assume AR15, 16 inch.

Mule deer, out to 500 yards.

Which is better - 6.8 spc or 6.5 grendel?

Your comments are appreciated!

GB1

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,800
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,800
Mule deer, out to 500 yards.

Neither



[Linked Image]
"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawakened."




Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,162
T
TWR Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
T
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,162
+1... LOL

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 529
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 529
This debate again?

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,800
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,800
Begining to think Lee24 has some compitetion

grin cool



[Linked Image]
"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawakened."




IC B2

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,190
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,190
IMO the grendel has it all over the 6.8 those 6.5mm bullets are much more ballistically efficient than a 110gr .270" bulllet. A 120gr Nosler ballistic tip would be the one i would look hard at, but 500 yds is really pushin its range, 300yds and under would be the correct range for its velocity.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,092
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,092
Originally Posted by DarkStar
IMO the grendel has it all over the 6.8 those 6.5mm bullets are much more ballistically efficient than a 110gr .270" bulllet. A 120gr Nosler ballistic tip would be the one i would look hard at, but 500 yds is really pushin its range, 300yds and under would be the correct range for its velocity.


Although it is rather difficult to compare Apples to Apples when the two rounds do not have identical bullet weights, but we can come close.

Using published load data with same barrel length and similar bullets I came up with this.

6.5 Grendel with 120gr Nosler BT. Muzzle velocity 2466fps.
Zero at 250 yards = 2037fps and 1105fpe
At 500 yards = -51.91 inches, 1657fps and 731fpe

6.8SPC with 130gr Nosler BT. Muzzle velocity 2430fps
Zero at 250 yards = 1981fps and 1133fpe
500 yards = -55.05 inches 1589fps and 729fpe

As you can see, the difference in performance between the two is almost immeasurable. The BC of the 120gr 6.5 is .458 while the BC of the 130gr 277 BT is .433. Not any real difference at all.


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,199
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,199
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by DarkStar
IMO the grendel has it all over the 6.8 those 6.5mm bullets are much more ballistically efficient than a 110gr .270" bulllet. A 120gr Nosler ballistic tip would be the one i would look hard at, but 500 yds is really pushin its range, 300yds and under would be the correct range for its velocity.


Although it is rather difficult to compare Apples to Apples when the two rounds do not have identical bullet weights, but we can come close.

Using published load data with same barrel length and similar bullets I came up with this.

6.5 Grendel with 120gr Nosler BT. Muzzle velocity 2466fps.
Zero at 250 yards = 2037fps and 1105fpe
At 500 yards = -51.91 inches, 1657fps and 731fpe

6.8SPC with 130gr Nosler BT. Muzzle velocity 2430fps
Zero at 250 yards = 1981fps and 1133fpe
500 yards = -55.05 inches 1589fps and 729fpe

As you can see, the difference in performance between the two is almost immeasurable. The BC of the 120gr 6.5 is .458 while the BC of the 130gr 277 BT is .433. Not any real difference at all.
My 20 inch Stag puts out 110 ttsx's at 2720 fps with a .377 BC. With I might add about 7 lbs of recoil. I like that out to maybe 400yds tops.I can't fathom shooting at 400 much less 500 with any rifle.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 387
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 387
Thanks for that! Very helpful, but not very impressive. I think the 300 yard limit suggested above is prudent.




Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by DarkStar
IMO the grendel has it all over the 6.8 those 6.5mm bullets are much more ballistically efficient than a 110gr .270" bulllet. A 120gr Nosler ballistic tip would be the one i would look hard at, but 500 yds is really pushin its range, 300yds and under would be the correct range for its velocity.


Although it is rather difficult to compare Apples to Apples when the two rounds do not have identical bullet weights, but we can come close.

Using published load data with same barrel length and similar bullets I came up with this.

6.5 Grendel with 120gr Nosler BT. Muzzle velocity 2466fps.
Zero at 250 yards = 2037fps and 1105fpe
At 500 yards = -51.91 inches, 1657fps and 731fpe

6.8SPC with 130gr Nosler BT. Muzzle velocity 2430fps
Zero at 250 yards = 1981fps and 1133fpe
500 yards = -55.05 inches 1589fps and 729fpe

As you can see, the difference in performance between the two is almost immeasurable. The BC of the 120gr 6.5 is .458 while the BC of the 130gr 277 BT is .433. Not any real difference at all.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
DPMS 260 = solid 500 yd deer rifle in good hands.

Better to have said, the 'Right Hands'....and I am not speaking about me. 500 is a long ways out, but the gun is Deer of Angle and the 260 is a killer.

IC B3

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,567
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,567
Mule deer or any big game at 500 yards indicates hunter is not a hunter. 99.9% of guys afield could not hit a 12" circle EVERY shot when shooting from real world field conditions at 500 yards. If you can't, you have no business trying it.

Both the cartridges mentioned are marginal at 300 on a big deer, look up the ballistics on a 25 Remington or 257 Bob if you think different.

A plain old 721 in 270 or 30-06 is FAR superior to either for a lot less money. My ancient 721 in 300 H&H is three times the rifle of either of those AR popguns. You want a serious AR, get a DPMS LR in 308 or 300 SAUM.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]/DSCN2020.jpg[/IMG]


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

610 members (1beaver_shooter, 10gaugeman, 240NMC, 270winchester, 007FJ, 257_X_50, 61 invisible), 2,341 guests, and 1,239 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,650
Posts18,455,461
Members73,908
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.068s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8384 MB (Peak: 0.9305 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-19 16:29:17 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS