|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,058
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,058 |
Playing musical scopes and put the K3 bought on here onto a very old 760 '06.
Figured I'd put a Bushnell 1.5-4.5x32 Circle X SG scope on the Frontier .358; trouble was, the objective touches the "scout mount". And I don't feel like pulling that part off the barrel.
Remembered a Weaver low-powered variable my brother picked up at a gunshow about 25 years ago and never mounted. Then I found out why: the box said it had the Dual-X reticle, but the scope actually has straight crosshairs that appear very thin to me.
It appears he was duped at the show.
So, two questions for the gunwriters, et al:
1. Will the thin crosshairs be a hindrance treestand hunting in the woods?
2. Will the scope survive the fairly healthy thump of a 6.5-pound .358?
All input appreciated.
�When in doubt, I whip it out.� Uncle Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,934
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,934 |
ColdCase1984:
IMO fine crosshairs can be a real problem in the woods....I have a couple that I use for squirrel hunting and sometimes they are very difficult to pick up[i][/i]. In the woods i think they would be problematic for deer hunting, especially if you had to pick them up quick.....squirrels usually give you a few minutes to mess with such things......again just my opinion. Great scope though, have one with an dot on a Marlin 62.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 200
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 200 |
I have several fixed power Weavers with the fine crosshairs, and yes, they are tough to see in the woods. However, I have made several quick shots with them and had no trouble. I think I was worried beforehand, but when the moment of truth arrived, no trouble. I can't speak to the variable's durability.
Jason
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,323
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,323 |
Only beef I've ever had with the thin crosshairs is in low light conditions, asides from that I really like them and use them a lot. My guess is it will hold up fine on your 358.
`Bring Enough Gun`
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,104
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,104 |
the crosshairs will definatly be a hinderance and the recoil will break the scope in half. Pack it up and send it to me for proper disposal.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,058
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,058 |
I need to cruise the Classifieds and see if anybody has a 2.5X Leupy LW with Heavy Duplex...that would make it a Perfect Packin Woods Carbine. Or get a set of medium rings and just mount the dang bushnell. I may put the steel Weaver on my '78 Model 10/22 for a squirrel zapper...
�When in doubt, I whip it out.� Uncle Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,104
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,104 |
Dang you CC, that's what I'd done with it. Have one on a 45/70 and have shot it a blue zillion times and it still works great. Would be just the thing for a squirrel rifle.
Last edited by schoolmarm; 10/25/10.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,790
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,790 |
I have had three different older Weaver steel tube scopes on my slug shooting shotgun, two K2.5 60B's and a V4.5. All have performed flawlessly, the K2.5's have post and crosshair reticles and the V4.5 is a duplex. Fine crosshair is more for targetwork than hunting as I could see how it would easily disappear on a dark day in heavy cover.
|
|
|
|
610 members (17CalFan, 10gaugeman, 12344mag, 10ring1, 1337Fungi, 16penny, 54 invisible),
2,696
guests, and
1,122
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,310
Posts18,468,202
Members73,928
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|