Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunting Rifles opinions on the tikka T3 vs the sako 75

Had both in 30-06, the Sako 75 was a nicer gun BUT the Tikka weighs alot less.

To me its down to finish and polish. Both will be very accurate, great triggers, and smooth bolts. For the money Tikka is hard to beat, Sako will cost more and in the long run will be worth more. If moneys not the object then Sako. If you want a great out of the box rifle for not alot of money then Tikka.

So does an A7.

For reference an A7 WSM will weigh almost exactly the same as a WSM Kimber Montana.

Jagd, 85's have a cast receiver? I am also curious to hear about the 1 in 60k blowup rate.

Since he won't respond, I'm thinking the number came out of his azz.

He'll learn quick around here..

[quote=jagd]they don't make the 75's anymore and t3's are a dime a dozen. i think 75's were the last ones to have a forged receiver too, 85's and t3's are cast...... and appear to be blowing up more than normal too.



Can you provide a link to where I can find out some definitive information about the cast receivers - this is the first time I have read any mention of the T3's being cast.

drover

I have a couple T3s and one 75. The 75 is by far a better rig in my eyes. It feels better, the mag is better, it looks better, and it shoots better than both of the T3s.

About the only advantages I can give to the T3 is the lighter weight and cheaper price.

+1

Since you can pretty much buy 2 T3s for the price of one 75. I would go that route and still be able to shoot with the 75. The left over funds can go towards glass and components. Good luck with your new stick.