24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 10 of 11 1 2 8 9 10 11
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,063
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,063
Can you imagine those matrix bullets running out of a fast twisted 270 Weatherby magnum? But then again I don't shoot game at 1000 yds anyway. laugh


JOC was right. The 270 Winchester on a Model 70 is a great combination as is the 30/06 and 375 H&H

BP-B2

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Ran an estimate for the matrix (165)

the most velocity I could get ( staying safe using QL) was

2890 fps

at 500 yards (comparing to the Berger 140 in .264)

Drop is 8.5 MOA and velocity is 2289 fps

Matrix only has in in velocity by 12 fps

at 1000 yards

24.50 moa and 1770 same drop but only 107 fps gain.

not much performance for risking everything on one bullet.

Now since we changed bullets for the 270 I changed to the 139 scenar for the 6.5-06.

safely to 3087 fps

at 500 yards

7.5 moa drop and 2345 fps

at 1000 yards

23 moa drop and 1722 fps

Matrix only has it by 48 fps and that's the only gain and it takes 1000 yards for it to get that tiny gain.


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Now albeit I only played with the QL a little bit.. but overall I think it was a pretty fair evaluation.

I've always wanted a high BC good bullet in 270. More makers need to get to the drawing table to compete with the 6.5's

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
crickets again....

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Originally Posted by Cocadori
You said I forgot Bergers so I used em.

You said you'd need a magnum hull for the heavy matrix.

Why would one put all their eggs in one basket... ala hoping one bullet will work?

BC's woulda been closer... 6.5 still wins no?


I dunno....I haven't seen the Matrix yet.....and there is a heavier Berger than 150 now. Hybrid I think.....yeah the comparison with the Bergers is of course valid....we can both cherry pick;but I think your 270 vels are a bit light from a 26" tube...I think the 150 will go over 3000 FWIW.

I really do not know how that Matrix bullet changes the game but it simply has to have an effect.Yes for the 175 a magnum hull might make more sense....I think the 165 would do well in the standard case.....not much difference between it and an Amax 162,and guys run those from 7/08's and 280's all the time....no one dumps on those combo's,and I see no reason why a 165 Matrix should not put a 270 solidly into the same class.

BC's over 700 have to count for something.... smile Even with a "win" on paper, I think the field is considerably narrowed now and it would be pretty hard to tell the difference in the field....with many bullets it already is.Practically speaking, if I seriously contemplated shooting animals beyond 600 yards, I'd want a 7mm,just "because"....neither a 6.5 or a 270 would be my choice.


I understand the velocity/expansion thing....if you grew up using tough bonded bullets,you could see it very clearly.

Last edited by BobinNH; 02/25/12.



The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
IC B2

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
I did a 26" tube for both. Using the same QL set up for both. I know for a fact that the QL is light on the 6.506 results because I've run them well over 3100 safely. However, accuracy isn't there.

I do hunt at distance. mostly I solo hunt now. So I wanted wind bucking ability and flatter shooting to 500-700 yards. Slam dunk for the 6.5-06. The 270 simply can compete.

For 1K I whole heartedly agree the 7's are where it's at.

I did grow up using hard tough bonded bullets. But I've moved away from them for obvious reasons. There's better out there for my applications.

Again, I wish pills makers would catch up with the 270 caliber. Maybe it can't be done I dunno...


Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Originally Posted by Cocadori
Ran an estimate for the matrix (165)

the most velocity I could get ( staying safe using QL) was

2890 fps

at 500 yards (comparing to the Berger 140 in .264)

Drop is 8.5 MOA and velocity is 2289 fps

Matrix only has in in velocity by 12 fps

at 1000 yards

24.50 moa and 1770 same drop but only 107 fps gain.

not much performance for risking everything on one bullet.

Now since we changed bullets for the 270 I changed to the 139 scenar for the 6.5-06.

safely to 3087 fps

at 500 yards

7.5 moa drop and 2345 fps

at 1000 yards

23 moa drop and 1722 fps

Matrix only has it by 48 fps and that's the only gain and it takes 1000 yards for it to get that tiny gain.



Oh, I didn't see this when I responded in my last post.....you were ahead of me! grin Well OK it seems we have somewhat equaled the playing field.....I musta guessed about right at the 2900 velocity from a long tube....looks like they are pretty close.

Sure, it's a one bullet thing but my point in the whole exercise was not to take you on personally (you are too smart for that grin but simply to hopefully demonstrate that the 270 is not the useless, chump change LR cartridge that some on here make it out to be....and maybe draw their attention to the fact that a lot of what we think we "know" is a holdover from bygone days when the technology had caught up to some cartridges, and not others.....

Justa couple of years ago, we did not have these 270 bullets, but we do now,and maybe this trend will continue,challenging what we thought we "knew"... wink

Touche! And thanks for your time and effort.....You're a good sport! grin




The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
I can think of 3 excellent LR bullets that are available, or soon will be, in .277":

- Berger EOL Hybrid 170gr
1.52" long
170 grains
Recommended twist 1:8.5"
Estimated G1 BC: 0.703
Estimated G7 BC: 0.360

- Matrix 165gr VLD
- Matrix 175gr VLD

That's 3 choices. If your rifle won't shoot one of the 3 bullets accurately, then I'd look to the loading techniques, other cartridge components, or the rifle itself. It wouldn't be hard to get an 8 or 9" twist tube made and twisted onto a decent action. I would think that any of these 3 high-BC .277" bullets would work fine in a standard .270 Win, assuming you used a mag that allowed bullets to be seated out nice and long, and a throat that accommodated same.

Here are a couple of our beloved charts *grin*, using JBM, of the 170gr Berger Hybrid (using the BC listed above), 140gr 6.5mm JLK VLD, and the 139gr Scenar:

6.5mm 140gr JLK VLD at 3050fps
600 yards
Drop (MOA)-9.0
Wind drift (MOA)3.0
Velocity 2195

1000 yards
Drop (MOA)-22.0
Wind drift (MOA)5.7
Velocity 1698

6.5mm 139gr Scenar at 3050fps
600 yards
Drop (MOA)-9.1
Wind drift (MOA)3.2
Velocity 2145

1000 yards
Drop (MOA)-22.8
Wind drift (MOA)6.2
Velocity 1624

.277 170gr EOL Hybrid at 2850fps
600 yards
Drop (MOA)-10
Wind drift (MOA)2.8
Velocity 2136

1000 yards
Drop (MOA)-23.8
Wind drift (MOA)5.2
Velocity 1712

And for comparison:

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Jordan .. I agree. But..It still barely beats the JLK.

Part of the argument was also that the 270 is a factory option 10 twist where as the 6.5-06 you need a custom barrel/twist.

Now you're into a custom barrel/twist with the 270.

I'll agree however, that the playing field is more level.

However, the 6.5 has more bullet choices. That in itself still trumps the 270.

I'm sure the bullet makers will catch up with 270 options sooner or later.

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Bob,

yup.. I try to remain level headed and never took it personally.

I contemplated the 270 but couldn't take a chance on waiting for good/better bullets.


IC B3

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Originally Posted by doubletap
Cocadori,
I'd like to see the numbers as well. At least if you're going to be biased, you should back it up. whistle


errr... well???

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Originally Posted by alpinecrick

Get 'em Bob!.........I''m loving it........ grin




Nothin' but crickets chirpin' in your corner...

laffin'

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Originally Posted by Cocadori
Jordan .. I agree. But..It still barely beats the JLK.

Part of the argument was also that the 270 is a factory option 10 twist where as the 6.5-06 you need a custom barrel/twist.

Now you're into a custom barrel/twist with the 270.

I'll agree however, that the playing field is more level.

However, the 6.5 has more bullet choices. That in itself still trumps the 270.

I'm sure the bullet makers will catch up with 270 options sooner or later.


There's no question that if you want to shoot the truly great LR bullets in either cartridge you'll need a custom 8-9" twist barrel, with an appropriate throat. But as a caliber, .277" is no longer at the disadvantage that it once was. Ballistic advantage is purely due to the bullets and barrels made available for any given caliber, and there are finally a few good bullets on the market in .277, with fast-twist barrels to match.

A large bullet selection is a good thing, but I have to ask, how many bullet choices does a guy really need? I could happily get along doing all of my hunting with 1 of the 3 options listed above for the LR stuff (the 170gr Berger EOL Hybrid Hunting looks REALLY good), and then an AB, TTSX, or PT for anything I might shoot within 400 yards. I do the same thing with my 7mm rifles. A 140gr TTSX for sub-400 yard work, and the 162gr A-Max for anything beyond that range (I could happily substitute the 168gr or 180gr VLD and 140gr AB, if selection in 7mm was more limited). Those two bullets get the job done for me. I really don't capitalize on the huge bullet selection available in 7mm, and I suspect that most guys likewise choose 1 or 2 bullets to use in any given rifle.

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,755
D
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,755
Originally Posted by Cocadori
Originally Posted by doubletap
Cocadori,
I'd like to see the numbers as well. At least if you're going to be biased, you should back it up. whistle


errr... well???

Ok, you came through and I agree that you are a good sport.


He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice.

- Albert Einstein
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
With those 170s, the 270 WSM is also looking like a viable long range performer. There's a guy over at SH running the 175 Matrixes in a comp style rig... Pretty cool.

But I'd still love a 6.5-06 smile

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
Originally Posted by Cocadori
Jordan .. I agree. But..It still barely beats the JLK.

Part of the argument was also that the 270 is a factory option 10 twist where as the 6.5-06 you need a custom barrel/twist.

Now you're into a custom barrel/twist with the 270.

I'll agree however, that the playing field is more level.

However, the 6.5 has more bullet choices. That in itself still trumps the 270.

I'm sure the bullet makers will catch up with 270 options sooner or later.


There's no question that if you want to shoot the truly great LR bullets in either cartridge you'll need a custom 8-9" twist barrel, with an appropriate throat. But as a caliber, .277" is no longer at the disadvantage that it once was. Ballistic advantage is purely due to the bullets and barrels made available for any given caliber, and there are finally a few good bullets on the market in .277, with fast-twist barrels to match.

A large bullet selection is a good thing, but I have to ask, how many bullet choices does a guy really need? I could happily get along doing all of my hunting with 1 of the 3 options listed above for the LR stuff (the 170gr Berger EOL Hybrid Hunting looks REALLY good), and then an AB, TTSX, or PT for anything I might shoot within 400 yards. I do the same thing with my 7mm rifles. A 140gr TTSX for sub-400 yard work, and the 162gr A-Max for anything beyond that range (I could happily substitute the 168gr or 180gr VLD and 140gr AB, if selection in 7mm was more limited). Those two bullets get the job done for me. I really don't capitalize on the huge bullet selection available in 7mm, and I suspect that most guys likewise choose 1 or 2 bullets to use in any given rifle.



You and I are on the same page mostly.

However, I do often tend to look at the match bullets for many of my endeavors. I like to have a large selection as different rifles like different things err most of the time. I tend to gravitate towards the Powder/Primer/Bullet/hull that the rifle likes best and shoot the tiniest group with the lowest ES. For that reason option are nice.

I realize many choose bullet first.

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Originally Posted by TannerGun
With those 170s, the 270 WSM is also looking like a viable long range performer. There's a guy over at SH running the 175 Matrixes in a comp style rig... Pretty cool.

But I'd still love a 6.5-06 smile


Yeah I've often wanted to build a 270 wsm but the bullets were the hold back.
I saw the stuff over on the hide.
I gotta tell ya that this year many of my perspectives changed. This 6.5-06 has me tweaked. I was never a fan of the LA but seeing the advantages and options the 6.5-06 gave me with the selection of bullets I'm not sure there isn't anything I couldn't hunt.

I was looking hard and long at a 260 rem then the Swede. I about pulled the trigger on the Swede. Talked to Roger and then was sold on the 6.5-06.

If I draw the sheep tag in the near future. I'll build the 260 if and only if to reduce weight in as many area's as possible.

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Cocadori, what sorta E.S/S.D do you look for in your long range rigs?

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,437
Call me crazy... but after competing in 1K br for a bit and talking and shooting with many of the best of the best. Their opinions and experience were pretty much always on the money.

10 is the magical number for ES. Or as close as possible to it. Lower don't hurt.

Over the years I'd say I was between 10 and 15 normally.

My best rifles were between 8 and 12. the rifle I shot my best group at 1K with was an "8" rifle.

The 6.5-06 I've been shooting is a "12" rifle.

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Cool, kinda though it'd be in that ballpark. The 243/105 AMAX load I have been running is showing an SD of like 13... But an ES of 30 (the 5 I clocked today.) I'd like to drop it down a bit...

Page 10 of 11 1 2 8 9 10 11

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
646 members (257_X_50, 1234, 257Bob, 06hunter59, 257man, 007FJ, 73 invisible), 2,939 guests, and 1,320 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,661
Posts18,399,311
Members73,817
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.107s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9126 MB (Peak: 1.0894 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-28 19:40:06 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS