24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
I'm close to pulling the trigger on a Sako Black Bear in 308Win, but I also want to consider the great 30-06.
I already have two 06's, but can one every have enough....LOL grin

My question.
The 30-06 BB has a 20" tube, as does the 308Win. And from memory, when I did use a short barreled 30-06 some years back, I do seem to remember it barked A LOT more than the 308Win in the same configuration.

What do you men think. Is a 20" barrel too short for a 30-06 confused

And what advantages will it have over the 308Win in the same configuration confused

Last edited by Melvin24; 04/20/12.

Taking my rifle for a walk
GB1

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
PS- The quoted Sako INFO of 21" is wrong. They're all 20". It is stated in the technical section


Taking my rifle for a walk
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,017
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,017
This would be a perfect rifle for 9.3x62.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
Originally Posted by Richdeerhunter
This would be a perfect rifle for 9.3x62.


I had a Sauer 202 Hardwoods in 9.3x62 with a 19" barrel. Way TOO LOUD IMO, but that extra 1" Sako added might be the kicker.......?

I dig the semi-heavy barrel. The flutes I don't really care for but I cannot change that wink


Taking my rifle for a walk
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 592
dhg Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 592
I can't compare a 20" barrel on a 30-06 to a .308, but i know a 20" on a 30-06 is too loud for me. Personally, in that rifle i'd be going with the .308, my reasoning being that the difference between a .308 and a 30-06 is small at the best of times and when you go down to 20" barrels i think you would find that the velocity increase with the 30-06 would be miniscule - probably 50fps. I'd rather save the few extra ounces of weight in the action and have the faster action operation of the shorter .308 action than have 50fps extra velocity.

If i wanted a bit more hitting power and was looking at heavier bullets, i'd go up to the .338 Federal instead of the 30-06 in that particular rifle with the short barrel. To my mind the 30-06 has always needed about a 22" barrel minimum to make it worthwhile vs the .308.


If your dad doesn't have a beard, you've got two mums
IC B2

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 284
S
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
S
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 284
308 for sure out of a short barrel. Love for the 308!

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20,494
T
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
T
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20,494
Your '06 burns about 12-15 grains more powder than the 308. Gotta bark louder. wink


"Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life." (Prov 4:23)

Brother Keith

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,760
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,760
Unless you really dig the Rechnagel sights, why not get a Finnlight, if you want it chambered 308 or 30-06?

I'm of the opinion the Black Bear screams to be chambered in 9.3x62...but that's me smile

I do have a 9.3 Black Bear, and I think of it as a 30-06 having the capability to shoot a larger bullet. It's basically a black Finnlight with Rechnagel sights. Mine was used to replace both a 338WM and 375H&H. I feel it makes a very handy package in that context. Flip side, if I were looking for a handy 308, I'd probably look at the Finnlight.

Best smile


�I've never met a genius. A genius to me is someone who does well at something he hates. Anybody can do well at something he loves -- it's just a question of finding the subject.�

- Clint Eastwood
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,817
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,817
Originally Posted by Melvin24
I'm close to pulling the trigger on a Sako Black Bear in 308Win, but I also want to consider the great 30-06.
I already have two 06's, but can one every have enough....LOL grin

My question.
The 30-06 BB has a 20" tube, as does the 308Win. And from memory, when I did use a short barreled 30-06 some years back, I do seem to remember it barked A LOT more than the 308Win in the same configuration.

What do you men think. Is a 20" barrel too short for a 30-06 confused

And what advantages will it have over the 308Win in the same configuration confused
..........I believe that you should get what your gutt tells you as to what you like the best and let the chips fall where they may.

Sure! From a 20" barrel, the 308 won`t quite be as loud as the `06. But with that stated, I would think that regardless of which cartridge you choose, you are going to be wearing some form of hearing protection at all times whether at the range or on hunts? Then if so, then the question as to which one is louder is really a non-issue imo.

Two out of my three rifles/cartridges below have barrels 20" and less. One a 16.5" barreled 300 WSM Ruger compact since early `07 and the other a 20" barreled 375 Ruger Alaskan since about mid `08. I always wear good muffs at the range and wear good hearing protection for field use.

Not to mention noise levels from a 338-378 Wby Accumark w/brake?

No hearing problems.

Get what you like and protect your hearing.





28 Nosler,,,,300WSM,,,,338-378 Wby,,,,375 Ruger


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
Originally Posted by dhg
I can't compare a 20" barrel on a 30-06 to a .308, but i know a 20" on a 30-06 is too loud for me. Personally, in that rifle i'd be going with the .308, my reasoning being that the difference between a .308 and a 30-06 is small at the best of times and when you go down to 20" barrels i think you would find that the velocity increase with the 30-06 would be miniscule - probably 50fps. I'd rather save the few extra ounces of weight in the action and have the faster action operation of the shorter .308 action than have 50fps extra velocity.

If i wanted a bit more hitting power and was looking at heavier bullets, i'd go up to the .338 Federal instead of the 30-06 in that particular rifle with the short barrel. To my mind the 30-06 has always needed about a 22" barrel minimum to make it worthwhile vs the .308.


I think you are spot on there dhg


Taking my rifle for a walk
IC B3

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
Originally Posted by bigsqueeze
Originally Posted by Melvin24
I'm close to pulling the trigger on a Sako Black Bear in 308Win, but I also want to consider the great 30-06.
I already have two 06's, but can one every have enough....LOL grin

My question.
The 30-06 BB has a 20" tube, as does the 308Win. And from memory, when I did use a short barreled 30-06 some years back, I do seem to remember it barked A LOT more than the 308Win in the same configuration.

What do you men think. Is a 20" barrel too short for a 30-06 confused

And what advantages will it have over the 308Win in the same configuration confused
..........I believe that you should get what your gutt tells you as to what you like the best and let the chips fall where they may.

Sure! From a 20" barrel, the 308 won`t quite be as loud as the `06. But with that stated, I would think that regardless of which cartridge you choose, you are going to be wearing some form of hearing protection at all times whether at the range or on hunts? Then if so, then the question as to which one is louder is really a non-issue imo.

Two out of my three rifles/cartridges below have barrels 20" and less. One a 16.5" barreled 300 WSM Ruger compact since early `07 and the other a 20" barreled 375 Ruger Alaskan since about mid `08. I always wear good muffs at the range and wear good hearing protection for field use.

Not to mention noise levels from a 338-378 Wby Accumark w/brake?

No hearing problems.

Get what you like and protect your hearing.





Too hard to wear hearing protection when stalking deer, as I am always on the move......

My gut says 308Win, but that 338Fed would be sweet too wink


Taking my rifle for a walk
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
Originally Posted by the_shootist
Your '06 burns about 12-15 grains more powder than the 308. Gotta bark louder. wink


YUP!


Taking my rifle for a walk
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
Originally Posted by Richdeerhunter
This would be a perfect rifle for 9.3x62.


For me it's a tad too short, as I remember my Sauer Hardwoods too well laugh
The BOOOOOOM that let off gave me a headache.
And my recent 9.3x62, which was a Zastava.....Whilst out sighting it in with a friend, as well as sighting in a 7mmRM R8(25" barrel Vs 24" for the Zastava). He commented just how much louder the 9.3 was.
Nah I reckon 22" is minimum here.

A friend just bought one, but unlike me he can wear hearing protection for there type of hunting. In that case it's a great choice!


Taking my rifle for a walk
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,760
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,760
Speaking in terms of unported barrels. At the range while wearing hearing protection and behind the rifle butt, I doubt anyone could tell the difference in report between two identical 9.3x62 rifles, if the only difference was one had a 20" barrel and the other had a 22" barrel.

In addition, without hearing protection while taking a shot on game, I think it would be impossible for you to discern a difference between the two. In the scheme of things, report from a 9.3x62 Black Bear shooting +pressure loadings is not anywhere near objectionable compared to other carbines, short barrelled rifles, turkey shotguns, handguns, etc. You'll notice little difference when firing on game.

Flip side; if the barrel is ported, you are in an enclosed area, or you are directly downrange of the muzzle blast, you'd think it loud even if it were a 308 with a 26-inch barrel.

If you're interested in a handy 9.3x62 bolt rifle, you'd have a hard time finding a production rifle much better than the Black Bear. If you're interested in a handy 308 or 30-06 and are interested in a Sako, I'd look over the Finnlight. I use my Black Bear with and without scope, and it is used as a brush rifle, therefore I appreciate the Rechnagel sights. If it were to be scoped and not used as a fixed sight rifle, it would be a Finnlight. Also, I'd choose the chambering based on the end game. If you're planning on using bigger .308 bullets for larger game, I'd look hard at the '06 over the 308, regardless of barrel length. If not, and it would be used with moderate bullets on medium game and elk, then the 308 may better fit.

Best smile


�I've never met a genius. A genius to me is someone who does well at something he hates. Anybody can do well at something he loves -- it's just a question of finding the subject.�

- Clint Eastwood
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
Originally Posted by GaryVA
Unless you really dig the Rechnagel sights, why not get a Finnlight, if you want it chambered 308 or 30-06?

I'm of the opinion the Black Bear screams to be chambered in 9.3x62...but that's me smile

I do have a 9.3 Black Bear, and I think of it as a 30-06 having the capability to shoot a larger bullet. It's basically a black Finnlight with Rechnagel sights. Mine was used to replace both a 338WM and 375H&H. I feel it makes a very handy package in that context. Flip side, if I were looking for a handy 308, I'd probably look at the Finnlight.

Best smile


Yes sir, a man after my own heart wink . I have always wanted a Sako Finnlight but never took the stand......Plus I dig how these are stainless, which IMO are just sooooooo much easier to maintain........
The lowest Sako ringsmounts mated with that new beaut Leupold Vx11 2-7x33


Taking my rifle for a walk
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
Originally Posted by GaryVA
Speaking in terms of unported barrels. At the range while wearing hearing protection and behind the rifle butt, I doubt anyone could tell the difference in report between two identical 9.3x62 rifles, if the only difference was one had a 20" barrel and the other had a 22" barrel.

In addition, without hearing protection while taking a shot on game, I think it would be impossible for you to discern a difference between the two. In the scheme of things, report from a 9.3x62 Black Bear shooting +pressure loadings is not anywhere near objectionable compared to other carbines, short barrelled rifles, turkey shotguns, handguns, etc. You'll notice little difference when firing on game.

Flip side; if the barrel is ported, you are in an enclosed area, or you are directly downrange of the muzzle blast, you'd think it loud even if it were a 308 with a 26-inch barrel.

If you're interested in a handy 9.3x62 bolt rifle, you'd have a hard time finding a production rifle much better than the Black Bear. If you're interested in a handy 308 or 30-06 and are interested in a Sako, I'd look over the Finnlight. I use my Black Bear with and without scope, and it is used as a brush rifle, therefore I appreciate the Rechnagel sights. If it were to be scoped and not used as a fixed sight rifle, it would be a Finnlight. Also, I'd choose the chambering based on the end game. If you're planning on using bigger .308 bullets for larger game, I'd look hard at the '06 over the 308, regardless of barrel length. If not, and it would be used with moderate bullets on medium game and elk, then the 308 may better fit.

Best smile


certainly some wise words!

my friend will fire his 9.3 soon(new rifle) which will give me a better indication.......

If I looked at a 9.3 I dare say I would just buy another 3006. That 06/180grTTSX is my pappy wink


Taking my rifle for a walk
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
As I think the 06 would be quieter, but that's hard to be certain.......


Taking my rifle for a walk
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
And after using the 338WM, 7mm-08Rem, 340Wby & 308Win on my quarry. I do believe there would not be much in killing power between a 9.3x62 using 250gr TTSX & 30-06 with a 180gr TTSX.
As I have had big stags run 100+ with perfect shoulder shots from my 340 & 338 then had em drop to the shot with a 7mm-08........Go figure??? That's hunting for ya wink


Taking my rifle for a walk
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
4
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
4
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,086
But a Tikka T3 stainless camo in 9.3x62 is another story. Great rifle/cal combo!!!


Taking my rifle for a walk
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 11,030
pal Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 11,030
The Black Bear cries out for a large bore. It seems made for the 9.3X62.


"There's more to optics than meets the eye."--anon

"...most of us would be better off losing half a pound around the waist than half a pound on our rifle."--dhg

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

276 members (12344mag, 10Glocks, 257 mag, 1eyedmule, 2UP, 300jimmy, 25 invisible), 1,466 guests, and 906 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,061
Posts18,463,321
Members73,923
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.086s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9034 MB (Peak: 1.0788 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-23 10:58:29 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS