24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Originally Posted by 65BR

I feel that 2200 is a good 'threshold' for TSX/TTSX bullets. I just do not believe a Barnes rifle bullet on average will expand enough to MY liking at 1,800.

Klik - what I do know is the older Barnes bullets are perhaps inferior in consistency and/or proper hardness/softness, etc. as IIRC those were older gen bullets. Agreed, copper is harder so it's a whole other ball of wax.



I agree with your idea of minimum needed speed to reliably expand.

As far as the old versus the new, I am not convinced that the new have improved on the old in anything except accuracy. If they have improved in consistency it is only that the new ones seem to open less widely than the old which perhaps helps them hold onto their petals nearly 100% of the time. The very first Barnes bullet I fired at an animal lost a petal or two on impact. It is one of only three, less than 10% of the moose I have been involved with the killing of which tipped right over on impact, a fact that was unavoidable given the fact that the bullet broke the top ends of both humerus bones. Quite frankly, I don't have a problem with these bullets losing petals. I much prefer a caliber-wide flat face to a four-spoked claw which never opens much. Obviously the caliber-wide, petal-less slug was open to a wide flat face at some point in the expansion before the petals came off. Copper is a difficult medium to work with when it comes to bullets, there is no doubt, at least relative to lead and cup and draw brass alloy. The success of the Barnes monos was achieved largely through the improvement in accuracy and fouling minimization. Expansion characteristics overall have not improved as near as I can tell. If they had Barnes would capitalize on it just as they have with the accuracy and fouling. It's not that they haven't constantly tried to improve expansion, but they try to avoid making it an issue since they still haven't achieved their goal. Perhaps the TTSX will be the tool by which they achieve it. My thoughts and opinions on the matter, and it may not be worth two cents.


Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
GB1

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,184
J
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,184
Thanks for the post, Frog.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Good points Klik.

JB has some thoughts on Barnes and various types, maybe he will share his knowledge.

Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

706 members (10gaugemag, 1234, 12344mag, 160user, 007FJ, 10ring1, 68 invisible), 3,095 guests, and 1,294 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,485
Posts18,451,963
Members73,901
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.088s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8072 MB (Peak: 0.8419 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-18 02:01:57 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS