24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Gunner, you will do fine w/that 243. OK has some open spaces so if you plan to shoot really far, you might check expansion at long ranges to know where the limits are for expansion.

You should be very good to go to +/- 350 to 400 yds. Any further I might lean to the 95 BT as its softer nose w/tapered jacket may open at lower speeds better. Just a thought, but sure you will flatten anything you properly aim at w/those loads. smile

GB1

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,243
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,243
Thanks 65BR, all shots will be way under 150 and closer to 75 where I will use the little 243W this fall. wink

Gunner


Trump Won!
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,015
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,015
This is from the epic thread over on Accurate Reloading forums - I take absolutely zero credit for Michael's work by posting this. It is just an interesting perspective:

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

FWIW I just tested the 185gr TTSX and 250gr Partition into a large spruce round (lengthwise) at 200 yards. The 185 TTSX hardly expanded at all. It penetrated ~50% further than the Partition, but the damage channel was very small compared to the Partition. I can post pictures if anyone cares to see.

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 874
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 874
DVD: a little hog is not an Elk or Moose. Believe me when I say that a 165gr lead based bullet might in fact stop in a big pillow full of wet grass and twigs, etc. That's the main reason the Nosler partition and such were developed. Bullets of the day (30's-40's) would not always penetrate throught that kind of stuff. This was also the reason Elmer used 220gr bullets in the 06, and recommended that nothing smaller than a 33 caliber with a 250 gr, and a lot of times a 300gr bullet be used on elk and such. He would agree that on a picture perfect side shot, many bullets would work, but when you hit an Elk/Moose, behind the ribs on the left side, and want the bullet to hit the shoulder on the right side, you better have plenty of penetration.

You need to get a copy of Big Game Hunting, by Elmer Keith and read it to understand the bullets, and hunting of that time. Elmer developed the prototype for the 280 Rem, the 338WM and 340Wby. They didn't have the powders then, that we have now, and sure not the bullets.

Today, there are so many really good bullets, there are a lot of folks don't know there was a time there wasn't. And that time was not that long ago. When my dad hunted Elk in the early 60's he shot an 06, using a load with a 220gr RN hollow pointed Rem. bullet, to make sure the penetration was there. I am kind of skeptical that a 185gr 338 bullet has the mass to keep on trucking if it hits an Elk in a full paunch, to go into the heart and lung area. Especially if a lead based one. While we are talking about Ttsxs here, there are a lot of people who still use the lead based , cup and core, bullets that don't have the penetration ability of the Ttsx.


Ghost
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Dang I sure like how those 225 SAF's look and good penetration as well.

Dober


"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
IC B2

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,881
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,881
Originally Posted by Tally_Ho
In preparation for a late season Arizona elk hunt this November, I have been testing different loads in my .338 Win Mag. I would guess the shot distance would be typical of most elk hunts, 0-400 yds or so. The top two contenders are the 210 gr TTSX at 2835 fps and the 225 gr TSX at 2780 fps. Accuracy being equal, which would you utilize?

I'm not interested in other bullets, the topic of discussion is the Barnes TSX, thanks!



Either one would be an excellent choice you can't make a wrong choice between those 2



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,015
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,015
Originally Posted by ghost
DVD: a little hog is not an Elk or Moose. Believe me when I say that a 165gr lead based bullet might in fact stop in a big pillow full of wet grass and twigs, etc. That's the main reason the Nosler partition and such were developed. Bullets of the day (30's-40's) would not always penetrate throught that kind of stuff. This was also the reason Elmer used 220gr bullets in the 06, and recommended that nothing smaller than a 33 caliber with a 250 gr, and a lot of times a 300gr bullet be used on elk and such. He would agree that on a picture perfect side shot, many bullets would work, but when you hit an Elk/Moose, behind the ribs on the left side, and want the bullet to hit the shoulder on the right side, you better have plenty of penetration.

You need to get a copy of Big Game Hunting, by Elmer Keith and read it to understand the bullets, and hunting of that time. Elmer developed the prototype for the 280 Rem, the 338WM and 340Wby. They didn't have the powders then, that we have now, and sure not the bullets.

Today, there are so many really good bullets, there are a lot of folks don't know there was a time there wasn't. And that time was not that long ago. When my dad hunted Elk in the early 60's he shot an 06, using a load with a 220gr RN hollow pointed Rem. bullet, to make sure the penetration was there. I am kind of skeptical that a 185gr 338 bullet has the mass to keep on trucking if it hits an Elk in a full paunch, to go into the heart and lung area. Especially if a lead based one. While we are talking about Ttsxs here, there are a lot of people who still use the lead based , cup and core, bullets that don't have the penetration ability of the Ttsx.


I was reading Jack O'Connor's The Rifle Book a few nights ago, and at page 232 (2nd Ed.) he states:

Quote
The best all-around bullet for the .30/06 is the 180-grain, The velocity of 2,700 foot-seconds is high enough to give a reasonably flat trajectory, and the bullet is heavy enough to penetrate well. Particularly in the bullets of heavy construction like the Silvertip and Core-Lokt it has all the penetration I want for any American big game. I remember shooting a grizzly on a sandbar in the Yukon with the 180-grain Core-Lokt. Every bullet went clear through the broadside and kicked up sand on the far side of the bear. With the same bullets I broke both shoulders of another grizzly and the bullets went clear through.


And on page 233, a very interesting endorsement:
Quote
The 220-grain bullets are for the heaviest game such as moose, Alaskan brown bear, and possibly elk in heavy timber. The controlled expanding bullets like the 220-grain Silvertip and Core-Lokt are probably best for medium-sized and dangerous African and Asiatic game like lions and tigers. With those bullets the .30/06 seems to be an entirely adequate lion rifle.


The Remington Core-Lokts are considered the opposite of "premium" today, yet game of the day seemed to die when shot with them. The biggest moose I`ve ever shot was felled by a 7x57 using plain old cup and core 162gr KS (RWS) bullets.


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,477
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,477
To be fair, the CL was a better bullet back then, than it is today...

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,188
J
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,188
Also, those bullets JOC mentioned were shot at velocities that are perfect for cup and core style bullets.

I always thought the idea behind the Barnes X bullets was to lighten up and drive them hard. If you are keeping your ranges on elk reasonable, maybe less than 500 yds or so, I would try the 185. I have had good penetration on small deer at 338 Fed velocities, and I doubt it will lose much weight when it hits an animal.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,243
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,243
Originally Posted by Mark R Dobrenski
Dang I sure like how those 225 SAF's look and good penetration as well.

Dober



Hey Dober, yer a smart feller, did I break the law by shooting that old chaps cow?

He was a retired Judge with IIRC some kind of ambulatory license, he was allowed bull or cow Elk, and buck or doe MD, his license didnt look anything like ours, [out of state over the counter] he was also allowed to travel on his ATV and could ride hot, and shoot from the ATV also.

This was in '96/'97, have always wondered iffin I was wrong, but when I heard him holler, and seen that damn hole she was headed for, I raised and fired, didnt want the old timer to lose his cow, and didnt want her suffering needlessly either.

Thanks,
Gunner


Trump Won!
IC B3

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,015
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,015
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
To be fair, the CL was a better bullet back then, than it is today...


Have they changed?


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Originally Posted by Arac
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
To be fair, the CL was a better bullet back then, than it is today...


Have they changed?



Actually I don't think they've changed, but the bars been raised. On a side note, I'd be willing to bet that more elk are taken in Montana every year with CL's and PP's than the Premiums. IMO they work just fine as long they're pointed in the right direction.

Dober


"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,243
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,243
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by Mark R Dobrenski
Dang I sure like how those 225 SAF's look and good penetration as well.

Dober



Hey Dober, yer a smart feller, did I break the law by shooting that old chaps cow?

He was a retired Judge with IIRC some kind of ambulatory license, he was allowed bull or cow Elk, and buck or doe MD, his license didnt look anything like ours, [out of state over the counter] he was also allowed to travel on his ATV and could ride hot, and shoot from the ATV also.

This was in '96/'97, have always wondered iffin I was wrong, but when I heard him holler, and seen that damn hole she was headed for, I raised and fired, didnt want the old timer to lose his cow, and didnt want her suffering needlessly either.

Thanks,
Gunner


.


Trump Won!
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by Mark R Dobrenski
Dang I sure like how those 225 SAF's look and good penetration as well.

Dober



Hey Dober, yer a smart feller, did I break the law by shooting that old chaps cow?

He was a retired Judge with IIRC some kind of ambulatory license, he was allowed bull or cow Elk, and buck or doe MD, his license didnt look anything like ours, [out of state over the counter] he was also allowed to travel on his ATV and could ride hot, and shoot from the ATV also.

This was in '96/'97, have always wondered iffin I was wrong, but when I heard him holler, and seen that damn hole she was headed for, I raised and fired, didnt want the old timer to lose his cow, and didnt want her suffering needlessly either.

Thanks,
Gunner


Hey Gunner, no worries man. I just got a kick out of the term assist... grin

U did the right thing no doubt.

Dober


"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,243
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,243
Thanks neighbor. wink

Gunner


Trump Won!
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,477
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,477
Originally Posted by Mark R Dobrenski
Originally Posted by Arac
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
To be fair, the CL was a better bullet back then, than it is today...


Have they changed?



Actually I don't think they've changed, but the bars been raised. On a side note, I'd be willing to bet that more elk are taken in Montana every year with CL's and PP's than the Premiums. IMO they work just fine as long they're pointed in the right direction.

Dober


That they do! But none-the-less, I was under the impression that the "core lockt" ring had been seriously reduced in size in the PSPCL bullets. I don't think the RNCL's have changed at all. Maybe I'm wrong, here.

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
[Linked Image]

The RN Core-lokts are still fine controlled expansion bullets; it's the well formed heavy, tapered jacket that seem to do the work on these.


Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,584
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,584
Originally Posted by Arac
This is from the epic thread over on Accurate Reloading forums - I take absolutely zero credit for Michael's work by posting this. It is just an interesting perspective:

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

FWIW I just tested the 185gr TTSX and 250gr Partition into a large spruce round (lengthwise) at 200 yards. The 185 TTSX hardly expanded at all. It penetrated ~50% further than the Partition, but the damage channel was very small compared to the Partition. I can post pictures if anyone cares to see.



Prima fascia evidence that when it comes to bullets and bra sizes BIGGER IS BETTER... And yep, never shot an elk,,,


A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,838
D
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 25,838
I respect everyones opinion but I have complete faith in the 185 TTSX getting the job done
Plenty of shock and awe and as far as penetration I never fret that with Barnes bullets

In

[Linked Image]

Out

[Linked Image]

Some may say a 125 lb hog 'aint a great barometer but I still contend a specimine of flesh, hide and blood is a better gauge of how a projectile will react. I see penetration, soft tissue damage and a nicely ventilated good size exit hole with much blood flow
Have been killing with Barnes TSX and TTSX bullets from.22 cal thru .308 cal and see no reason the 185 TTSX will act or preform any different


My dog is a member of the "Turd Like Clan"

Covert Trail Cameras are JUNK

3 Time Dinkathon Champion #DinkGOAT



Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,243
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,243
100% agreed Dan, I will be surprised if you are able to recover any of the 185's on your PG hunt, cant wait to find out though. wink

Gunner


Trump Won!
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

663 members (12344mag, 1minute, 1eyedmule, 10gaugeman, 1beaver_shooter, 10ring1, 64 invisible), 3,115 guests, and 1,286 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,698
Posts18,456,728
Members73,909
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.126s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9083 MB (Peak: 1.0699 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-20 02:14:22 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS