#7288529 - 01/09/13 05:33 AM
Re: Is a Ruger No. 1 in .243 too petite for most hunters?
[Re: Bushmaster1313]
|
Campfire Regular
Registered: 01/14/10
Posts: 539
Loc: wisconsin
|
If I had a Ruger 1A in 243. I would hunt the hell out of it. If purchasing new though I would probably buy a larger caliber.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7288641 - 01/09/13 06:05 AM
Re: Is a Ruger No. 1 in .243 too petite for most hunters?
[Re: digger44]
|
Campfire Guide
Registered: 05/21/01
Posts: 4166
Loc: Reston, VA, USA
|
There was a time that the 243 1B was fairly available on the resale market and at very good prices as they were not much sought after. I used several as donors for bigger bore projects. I kept my 6mm Rem 1B intact as I prefer it over the 243.
243s in 1A or RSI cofiguation woud make a good kid's or small framed woman's deer/varmint rifles. And it is legal for deer in states that ban the 22 calibers.
1B
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7289024 - 01/09/13 07:39 AM
Re: Is a Ruger No. 1 in .243 too petite for most hunters?
[Re: 1B]
|
Campfire Regular
Registered: 11/17/10
Posts: 1093
Loc: OC, CA
|
I've used a stock 1-A in .243 for years, big game (deer and hogs) and varmints, mainly ground squirrels, coyotes, and jackrabbits. It'll kill any deer dead, dead within reasonable ranges, meaning the distance YOU can make a clean high shoulder, neck, or head shot. For me that's about 150 yards, although I killed a nice muley in the Snake River breaks years ago at more like 200 (hard to "pace" distance when it's almost vertical!). And I DON'T shoot at animals that are running; don't do that with a .358, either. I use 95-100 grain bullets, mainly Nosler. Heavier caliber 1-As kick some. A .243 doesn't, so you can shoot it a lot and get VERY friendly with it shooting paper, squirrels and other varmints before big game hunting season.
My 1-A fits me perfectly without modification. I'm 5' 10" 200#, and have, as my gunsmith puts it, "ape hanger arms." He means "long."
1-Bs shoot fine, but I never saw the advantage of the long barrel and extra weight in a .243, especially one that's gonna be carried a lot. On a long day's "glass and stalk," a 1-A is just right. Put a compact 2x7 on it and you're set.
_________________________
Was Mike Armstrong. Got logged off; couldn't log back on. RE-registered my old call sign, Mesa. FNG. Again. Mike Armstrong
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7292869 - 01/10/13 04:23 AM
Re: Is a Ruger No. 1 in .243 too petite for most hunters?
[Re: 7X64]
|
Campfire Guide
Registered: 02/12/01
Posts: 3400
Loc: Tallahassee, FL USA
|
I had one that I had bought for my daughter but the stock was too long for her. I hunted with it for deer.
_________________________
500 grains of lead propelled at 1200 FPS by 70 grains of black powder will cure a lot of ills
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7293000 - 01/10/13 05:25 AM
Re: Is a Ruger No. 1 in .243 too petite for most hunters?
[Re: pacecars]
|
Member
Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 89
|
I can't believe that this is even a thread here! How many hunters do you figure head out into the field each year with a .243? If it didn't work well, do you think they'd be toting one? I have No. 1's in a variety of calibers, but tend to use the lesser calibers MORE. 243's, 6.5x55, 250 Savage are always my go tos. I've never had a deer complain from the receiving end of any of them. Bigger than deer sized critters though, and I probably would drop the 243 or the Savage. I'd have no qualms tackling a Moose (and they do regularly in Scandanavia) with my 6.5x55. I hunt my .243 RSI regularly for another reason as well. It shoots like a dream, is short so I don't dump snow down my back walking in thick stuff, and fits in the tree stand beautifully. Some of the larger rifles can be awkward up there. I also have a .243 Blaser Stutzen, but that one only comes out on the nice days due to nice wood. If you're talking deer the 243 is a mighty fine cartridge if you ask me. DEAD...via 243 (on the spot too):  
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7293174 - 01/10/13 06:18 AM
Re: Is a Ruger No. 1 in .243 too petite for most hunters?
[Re: littlecmonkey]
|
Campfire Guide
Registered: 05/21/01
Posts: 4166
Loc: Reston, VA, USA
|
I just remembered that an African PH who frequented our Safari Club banquets told me that he and his family regularly use .243s for culling animals -- plains game -- on their huge property in SA. That is not to say that if you showed up in his camp with a .243 for a trohopy hunt he wouldn't be highly unhappy with your choice. The difference is that he and his brood can shoot and the cull animals, while no dinks, are not as beefy as the trophy critters.
1B
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7296311 - 01/10/13 06:27 PM
Re: Is a Ruger No. 1 in .243 too petite for most hunters?
[Re: digger44]
|
Campfire Ranger
Registered: 07/01/04
Posts: 1875
Loc: Oklahoma City
|
If I had a Ruger 1A in 243. I would hunt the hell out of it. Yep. One is on my short list, coyotes through antelope and whitetail.
_________________________
"Jimmy, some of it's magic, Some of it's tragic, But I had a good life all the way." (Jimmy Buffet)
SotG
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7320635 - 01/16/13 08:46 AM
Re: Is a Ruger No. 1 in .243 too petite for most hunters?
[Re: Son_of_the_Gael]
|
Campfire Regular
Registered: 01/22/12
Posts: 1189
Loc: South Dakota
|
I had a No. 1 in .243. A 200th year model. It weighed 9.25# with a 6x scope. The stock dimensions are the same as any other No. 1 of the same model. I would think that any small framed person or a young hunter would have the same issues(good and bad)with it as he would with any larger caliber.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|