Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Israel Pays Big Bucks for Propaganda Writers

I'm waiting for the Jews to control the Internet. They don't seem to have a handle on it.

Think thats bad. Wait till they start railing against the lizard people....VENTURA 2016

Yeah, I guess the news footage I seen back around 9/11/01 of Palestinians dancing in the streets, was probably propaganda footage from some paid Israeli shill...GFY

We had a cable package that included al jazeera, so I watched it for a few minutes several times a night to see how they would treat things. Unless it was muslimm related, their reporting was not much different than Fox. No hateful BS like MSNBC spews.

Think maybe the zionists have gotten to al jazeera?

Strange bedfellows, there.

More Muslim Bullschitt....

Israel get thousands of rockets fired at them from Gaza and its Israel's fault evidently....we've got a troll to tell us so...

So SanSappy.... clarify for me, so I don't have it wrong...

are you a Muslim, or just a friggin idiot?

Funny about that MSM chirping. My opinion is based mostly upon having boots on the ground in Israel, Egypt, Oman, Quatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Jordan.

The jew controlled media has about 0% to do with it......

A true liberal/neocon is an interventionist. A true conservative is a noninterventionist. That makes you a liberal/neocon and me a conservative.

Rule 5:

Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as �kooks�, �right-wing�, �liberal�, �left-wing�, �terrorists�, �conspiracy buffs�, �radicals�, �militia�, �racists�, �religious fanatics�, �sexual deviates�, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.


Rule 17:

Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can �argue� with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

You have Rules for Radical memorized.

Jus' sayin'...

Woodrow Wilson must give you a woodie..

Like Nancy Pelosi.

Has anyone been able to confirm veracity of this story? I read from a very credible source that this is fiction of a journalist using a pseudonym. I have no clue, however, the account seems suspicious.

From the linked article:

"...Barbati, Jerusalem Correspondent for Radio Popolare Milano, and a former reporter for Sky Italia, in Beijing, said, �Out of #Gaza far from #Hamas retaliation: misfired rocket killed children yday [yesterday] in Shati. Witness: militants rushed and cleared debris.�

Why would Hamas allow a Jerusalem correspondent to chronicle its activities? Why were only children killed?

I honestly do not know the veracity of this account. I would not be surprised that it was the product of hasbara.

No one KNOWS what is factual vis-a-vis Israel and its Palestinian genocide. When anyone tells you they KNOW what is occurring, he's BS'ing you. He knows only what media sources tell him. My objective is truth. And for some, truth must be denied.

There is one constant: if it comes from anywhere in the Middle East, I am naturally suspicious of veracity. After all, news, including Fox News, is entertainment. News sources are so inherently unreliable that they are deemed hearsay and wholly deficient as evidence to prove truth.

Here's another take on Israel's killing children:

"This is what the British general Rupert Smith calls �the reality in which the people in the streets and houses and fields � all the people, anywhere � are the battlefield�. The Israelis did not go into Gaza to kill children. But, as Jon Snow implied in his passionate video this week, they went in knowing that they would kill children because it is impossible in that crowded, chaotic territory to pursue their foes without massive collateral damage. The only way not to kill children would be not to go in at all. And that raises the most critical issue, which is why they went in. The immediate justification was that Hamas rockets and raiding parties entering through tunnels were a threat to Israeli civilians. One may quarrel with that, because this threat has been, so far, relatively limited. It might get worse in the future, but is a country justified in the use of force because of something that may happen rather than something that has happened? That threat might never fully materialise because of Israeli technical superiority or because political developments rendered it irrelevant."

I would like to read corroborating proof of what Barbati wrote that he witnessed. As the above article purports to reveal, Israel did kill children. Obviously it has motive to place blame elsewhere.

Remember to pursue facts. Augumentum ad hominem implicates Rule 5.

Jus' sayin'...

Written by a true propagandist. You've got Rules for Radicals memorized.

jorge,

Tell me what you KNOW and how you KNOW it. That would impress me.

Exactly!

Are you that stupid or are you paid for posting this siht?

And you read this where in the New Testament? Or are you not Christian?

Is it really just a handful of posters on the 'fire that want to stop needless slaughter? Is it really a majority of the 'fire's posters who demand genocide of Palestinians, including women and children? What in God's name does that reveal about Americans as a people?

You are such a cretin, SansSouci. Posting on propaganda and meanwhile posting it yourself.

You need to try Hebrew National's.

You'll change your tune.



Travis

Prove it's false. That would impress me.

Why would you suppose Jewish extremists tried to prevent release of The Passion of the Christ, one of the BEST films I've ever seen?

Just explain that for me sans Rule 5 tactics. That'll impress me.

SSS (Sans S. Shill).