24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 145
A
AlC Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 145
Am very interested in hearing input form those who have killed animals with the 162 grain 7mm A-Max bullets. I would love to hear from those willing to share experiences and opinions on this bullets performance at short and long range. Considering using it on cow elk.

Last edited by AlC; 08/12/14.
GB1

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,339
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,339
Deer, OK. Elk not so much.

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 151
N
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
N
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 151
I've killed a lot of deer and pigs with it. The performance for me was very similar to the Nosler Ballistic Tip. If you hit heavy bone you might not get an exit but it still dispatched the animal.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Son-in-law used a .30-06 and a 168g A-MAX on antelope. The A-MAX destroyed (ruined would be an understatement) a lot of meat and appeared to have come apart pretty explosively, much like a varmint bullet.

No way I'd use them on a big animal like elk where the bullet might have to travel a ways to get to the vitals. No doubt at all that they will work on a well-placed broadside or that they might fail in other situations.



Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.

A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
All bullets are a compromise of sorts: accuracy, expansion, BC, toughness, price, etc. A-max are great in a number of situations, but they are not a bonded bullet, or a partitioned bullet, or a monometal bullet. Understanding their limitations and capitalizing on their advantages is the goal if you're going to hunt with them. They aren't a 'hunting' bullet, mostly because people expect hunting bullets to do things that target-type bullets won't always do. For the same reason that it isn't a good idea to take a 600 yd shot with a 7 mag and a 150 core-loct, it isn't a good idea to take a 50 yd shot at the shoulder knuckle of a bull elk with a 162 Amax. The core-loct falls like a stone at that range, and the 162 will damage a lot of meat, and may not get into the vitals. It's about knowing the limitations of the design. If you aren't going to push those, then proven designs like the Partition is likely your best option.


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
IC B2

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 145
A
AlC Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 145
Thanks a ton.
Most likely will use a 160 AB.

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 145
A
AlC Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 145
Thanks a ton.
Most likely will use a 160 AB.

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,339
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,339
160 AB will do just fine.

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
Can't go wrong with AB.


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,484
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,484
I've used 160 grain AB on elk with very satisfactory results but have since switched to the Barnes TTSX (shoots better in my rifle) and has done very well on elk at out a little past 300 and as close as 11 yards. I did have a ballistic tip blow up on a rib and lead to a 600 yard tracking job after a perfectly placed shot......decided to go with the Barnes and haven't been sorry.

IC B3

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,776
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,776
Specneeds, 120 or 140 in the barnes?


The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment. � WARREN G. BENNIS
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
George -

Not specneeds but when trying the 120's in my 7mm RM, accurate loads eluded me until I finally went to IMR 7828SSC.

The 140's with the same powder are what I use now. At short ranges they do everything the 120's will do and have more of what I want at long range.



Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.

A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 22
New Member
Offline
New Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 22
The quest for High BC and Physics cheating abilities should not even register with a hunter IMO. a Quick, clean, accurate kill at sensible ranges, as little meat damage as possible and actually hunting your quarry (not laying on a hillside, dialling in 2 pound scopes, lobbing match bullets at animals) should always be paramount. That's all I look for in a bullet.
Sleek profiles, Plastic tips and boat tails are great on sex toys but not necessary on hunting bullets.


Dammit- the gay max doesn't have a plastic tip- comment still stands.

Last edited by Pack_Hunter; 08/14/14.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,213
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,213
I continue to see posts that seem to ask permission to use this bullet.

Personally, I'm far from a bullet geek but significant things that seem to be repeated here and on other sites are, kill if placed well, very accurate, not recommended for hunting by the manufacturer, fowl barrels quickly.

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
Originally Posted by Pack_Hunter
The quest for High BC and Physics cheating abilities should not even register with a hunter IMO. a Quick, clean, accurate kill at sensible ranges, as little meat damage as possible and actually hunting your quarry (not laying on a hillside, dialling in 2 pound scopes, lobbing match bullets at animals) should always be paramount. That's all I look for in a bullet.
Sleek profiles, Plastic tips and boat tails are great on sex toys but not necessary on hunting bullets.


Dammit- the gay max doesn't have a plastic tip- comment still stands.


I disagree with you regarding what hunting is, and what bullets that work well need to look like. I've never seen gay-max bullets. Not available in America, I guess. A-max do have a polymer tip.


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 151
N
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
N
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 151
Originally Posted by Alamosa
I continue to see posts that seem to ask permission to use this bullet.

Personally, I'm far from a bullet geek but significant things that seem to be repeated here and on other sites are, kill if placed well, very accurate, not recommended for hunting by the manufacturer, fowl barrels quickly.


They don't fowl any faster than any other bullet. Depending on which manual a person has they were recommended for up to medium game.

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 22
New Member
Offline
New Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 22
My mistake I was thinking of those [bleep] Berger bullets that cut-lunch commandos lob at animals across vast distances

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 151
N
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
N
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 151
Bergers don't either. Only bullet I've ever had foul fast was Barnes.

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
Next, I'll be a racist for using Bergers on game. Good times!


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 733
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 733
A friend gave me a box of 7mm A-Maxes that had been on his shelve for years, the ones in a white box...
They have been extremely accurate in my Blaser K-95 7x65R, and in my son's too.
When they were almost gone I bought two boxes of the new stuff, the ones in the red box.
At first sight I noticed they are not quite the same, the new ones carrying a much narrower meplat and, therefore, a much smaller plastic red tip. Hmm... that probably makes them not-so-explosive on game, I thought...
The problem is that these new A-Maxes are giving me mediocre accuracy...
I still have a few cartridges loaded with the old ones, and last time I shot them they gave me such good accuracy, with five shots in 3.6" at 550 yds. that I am tempted in taking them on my Tien Shan Ibex hunt to Kyrgyzstan in October.
Muzzle velocity of my loads is 2,800 fps and, normally, shots will be at 300 yds. and more, but even in these conditions I am not sure if they won't be too soft...
Has anybody experienced with this old design A-Max on game, actually?
Thank you for your comments,
Alvaro

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
A-max bullets are target bullets and are not designed for hunting. They are suppose to be accurate for that reason. They will work on deer, but most bullets work on deer.

After investing the time and money in an elk hunt, I would never use a target bullet and hope for the best. Elk deserve quality bullets that leave little to chance. Personally, I would never even consider anything under 140 grains in a 7 mag and it is always going to be a premium bullet for me. Accubonds, Partitions, Barnes, North Forks, Interbonds all come to mind. They can keep the Bergers and A-maxes.


You did not "seen" anything, you "saw" it.
A "creek" has water in it, a "crick" is what you get in your neck.
Liberals with guns are nothing but hypocrites.
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 145
A
AlC Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 145
A fair number of you came down pretty hard on "just the idea" of hunting elk with A-Max bullets. Don't worry, my skin is tough and it doesn't bother me. Your scorn at "just the idea" of doing this firmly confirmed my suspicions that this wasn't a good thing to do. Honest opinions are the only ones I wanted and the only ones that are important. THANKS fellas. The A-Maxs are on he shelf and the 160 ABs are loaded and ready for range work. Am trying a few 160 PTs just for kicks as well. Appreciate the input.

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,825
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,825
a wise choice, IMHO.

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,297
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,297
Without a doubt. The 160 AB and PT are great bullets.


Semper Fi
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
A 162 into the ribs, from any distance, and you have a dead elk. That is the one great reason to use them. They'd be great for neck shots too. If you can pick your shot, there is no downside. If you are more or less confined to the shots presented, then things could get iffy. The thing that would prevent the iffy would be to shoot them at slow speed, so they act more like a tough bullet at high speed. When it comes down to it, I'd rather have a soft bullet that doesn't exit than a hard bullet that pencils through. The ideal for most, and certainly for the vast majority posting here on the campfire, is somewhere in the middle of that spectrum.

Guys still kill elk every year with soft, non-jacketed bullets, so a tough bullet is not needed.


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 321
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 321
I have taken one bull with a 162 A-max.
Previously my son killed a cow with the same bullet fired from a 7 STW at 3250 fps. His shot was behind the shoulder broadside at about 500 yrds. The exact range escapes me. The cow folded at the shot and rolled down the hill. Bullet performance was pretty explosive and I could not find a mark on the opposite interior surface of the rib cage.
The bull I killed was with the same rifle and load. Range was about 175 yards, the bullet entered low in the chest, just infront of the shoulder bone. It angled through the chest and stopped just short of the opposite shoulder bone. Recovered weight was 31 grains. Lungs were jello, and the bull made about four jumps in place and then fell and expired.
Given the speeds I was launching them, and my preference for more penetration, I have moved on to other bullet choices.


"If it wasn't for the pu**y and the prestige.....nobody would want to be a gunsmith."
MColeman
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 330
M
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
M
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 330
Can't deny the superior slippery B/C of a 162 but I'm liking what JBM tells me with '22 pushing a 120 TTSX @ 3500 outta the 7RM. Zippity-doo-dah....

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 70
W
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
W
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 70
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
If you can pick your shot,...




Should we be so lucky.








Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Originally Posted by WillFish
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
If you can pick your shot,...


Should we be so lucky.


Yup. It doesn�t always work that way.

When I lived in Minnesota I went through two winters with standard tires on my car � no money for snow tires and no place to store the regular tires. Drove to Iowa through several bad blizzards, and always made it to my destination safely. Even in MN, although the snowfall was unusually heavy one of those years, the standard tires got me where I was going. There were some really tough drives, though. At the time I considered myself lucky and decades later still believe that. These days I run a 4x4 with aggressive tread when the snow is on the road. Much better.

When elk hunting we don�t always get to pick our shot opportunities. We may be able to wait and get the perfect broadside of our dreams or we may end up with tag soup instead. While I am OK with waiting and passing on bad angles and ranges beyond my comfort zone, I�m not willing to compromise on bullet selection. Bullets that may pencil through at low impact velocities are of no more interest than bullets that may blow up at high impact velocities. Give me a bullet in the middle, something that provides reliable but controlled and limited expansion with good weight retention across as wide a velocity spectrum as possible. In my limited experience (30+ years hunting elk) such bullets may or may not produce two holes but they do penetrate deeply and put animals on the ground with authority.

What concerns me is not what a bullet will do on a well-placed broadside � almost any bullet will work in that situation. I�ve often felt a 40g V-MAX from my .22-250 would reliably put elk in the freezer with such a shot. My concern is what happens when things go south � the animal moves and placement suffers or a wounded or possibly wounded animal is heading away and your only options are a bad raking angle or THS. The last thing I want in the chamber on such occasions is a bullet that can�t reach the vitals. We�ve had very good results with high DRT percentages using Barnes TTSX and MRX bullets. So far we have always had two holes, even on front-to-back shots on mulies. North Fork bullets don�t always provide two holes but animals have dropped straight down often as not (or more) and none have run or made it more than a few steps. I�ve driven a 7mm 140g North Fork from ham to sternum on a mulie that turned and stepped forward as the trigger broke. That buck dropped straight down instantly. The old style Speer Grand Slams were my choice for 20+ years. Two holes were the norm and while game didn�t always drop straight down, a high percentage did and none went far. I didn�t recover a Grand Slam until the last year I used them and that one destroyed both shoulder joints of a 5x5 bull before coming to rest under the off-side hide. The only reasons I don�t still use those bullets are A) Speer changed the manufacturing process, B) the BC was relatively low, and C) accuracy was acceptable but not as good as with other options. These days I use mostly Barnes TTSX (and some remaining MRX I have loaded), North Fork SS, Nosler AccuBond, and Swift Scirocco II.

This year I will be using a Ruger American .30-06 Dad gave me before he passed and I haven�t had time to work up loads for it. That rifle seems to like white box Winchester 180g Power Points, though, so that will probably be what I use for elk. I�m not at all worried they may splash on impact or fail to penetrate afterwards because the bullet design is well suited to the velocity and application. A thin-skinned A-MAX might work but after seeing how a 168g blew up on my son-in-law�s antelope, no thanks.






Last edited by Coyote_Hunter; 08/21/14. Reason: animal to animals

Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.

A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by WillFish
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
If you can pick your shot,...


Should we be so lucky.


Yup. It doesn�t always work that way.

When I lived in Minnesota I went through two winters with standard tires on my car � no money for snow tires and no place to store the regular tires. Drove to Iowa through several bad blizzards, and always made it to my destination safely. Even in MN, although the snowfall was unusually heavy one of those years, the standard tires got me where I was going. There were some really tough drives, though. At the time I considered myself lucky and decades later still believe that. These days I run a 4x4 with aggressive tread when the snow is on the road. Much better.

When elk hunting we don�t always get to pick our shot opportunities. We may be able to wait and get the perfect broadside of our dreams or we may end up with tag soup instead. While I am OK with waiting and passing on bad angles and ranges beyond my comfort zone, I�m not willing to compromise on bullet selection. Bullets that may pencil through at low impact velocities are of no more interest than bullets that may blow up at high impact velocities. Give me a bullet in the middle, something that provides reliable but controlled and limited expansion with good weight retention across as wide a velocity spectrum as possible. In my limited experience (30+ years hunting elk) such bullets may or may not produce two holes but they do penetrate deeply and put animals on the ground with authority.

What concerns me is not what a bullet will do on a well-placed broadside � almost any bullet will work in that situation. I�ve often felt a 40g V-MAX from my .22-250 would reliably put elk in the freezer with such a shot. My concern is what happens when things go south � the animal moves and placement suffers or a wounded or possibly wounded animal is heading away and your only options are a bad raking angle or THS. The last thing I want in the chamber on such occasions is a bullet that can�t reach the vitals. We�ve had very good results with high DRT percentages using Barnes TTSX and MRX bullets. So far we have always had two holes, even on front-to-back shots on mulies. North Fork bullets don�t always provide two holes but animals have dropped straight down often as not (or more) and none have run or made it more than a few steps. I�ve driven a 7mm 140g North Fork from ham to sternum on a mulie that turned and stepped forward as the trigger broke. That buck dropped straight down instantly. The old style Speer Grand Slams were my choice for 20+ years. Two holes were the norm and while game didn�t always drop straight down, a high percentage did and none went far. I didn�t recover a Grand Slam until the last year I used them and that one destroyed both shoulder joints of a 5x5 bull before coming to rest under the off-side hide. The only reasons I don�t still use those bullets are A) Speer changed the manufacturing process, B) the BC was relatively low, and C) accuracy was acceptable but not as good as with other options. These days I use mostly Barnes TTSX (and some remaining MRX I have loaded), North Fork SS, Nosler AccuBond, and Swift Scirocco II.

This year I will be using a Ruger American .30-06 Dad gave me before he passed and I haven�t had time to work up loads for it. That rifle seems to like white box Winchester 180g Power Points, though, so that will probably be what I use for elk. I�m not at all worried they may splash on impact or fail to penetrate afterwards because the bullet design is well suited to the velocity and application. A thin-skinned A-MAX might work but after seeing how a 168g blew up on my son-in-law�s antelope, no thanks.



Well-said.




You did not "seen" anything, you "saw" it.
A "creek" has water in it, a "crick" is what you get in your neck.
Liberals with guns are nothing but hypocrites.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

77 members (10gaugemag, 444Matt, 44automag, 35sambar, 16 invisible), 2,225 guests, and 721 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,279
Posts18,467,665
Members73,928
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.061s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9542 MB (Peak: 1.1595 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 07:41:50 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS