|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,658
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,658 |
am thinking of getting an ar only interested in F N or colt ,i know F N makes them for the military now ,are there civillian model as good as the military version and which is better FN or colt ? wanting it to target practace and home defense
NRA Life Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,130
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,130 |
My Colt M-4 HBAR Elite is nice, but it is an AR after all, same ol', same ol'. Nothing much special about them, squeeze trigger, goes bang, hits target. Colt name may be worth a bit more in long run, but I didn't buy it to sell it used.
Buy the one with features you want or need.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,436
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,436 |
Colt. For the name. For the history. For your Mother.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300 |
I am sure its a flip a coin decision, recent Colts all seem to work fine.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 249
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 249 |
Well I don't know about the FN AR, but my FN Scar 16s is heads and tails above the Colt Competition I used to have!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 14,653
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 14,653 |
Colt Competition isn't Colt, just to keep the comparison fair.
your flippant remarks which you so adeptly sling
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300 |
forget them piston AR's and SCAR's and just get you a good AK! The SCAR is just an AK want a be!
Last edited by jimmyp; 09/12/14.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 15,805
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 15,805 |
I have spent a good bit of time both at Colt Defense and Fabrique nationale.
Both are excellent companies. FN though, is a thoroughly modern, completely state of the art factory that I was immensely impressed with its capabilities.
COLT, is a great manufacturer, and its weapons are top notch, but the facility leaves a lot to be desired. The unions are destroying colt.
In the end you cannot go wrong buying either and I would carry either into battle with confidence.
THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL. The Tikka T3 in .308 Winchester is the Glock 19 of the rifle world. The website is up and running!www.lostriverammocompany.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,622
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,622 |
I've been issued both Colt and FN M4s, and there's no practical difference between them functionally or in terms of accuracy. Would be proud to own either.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,132
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,132 |
I have spent a good bit of time both at Colt Defense and Fabrique nationale.
Both are excellent companies. FN though, is a thoroughly modern, completely state of the art factory that I was immensely impressed with its capabilities.
COLT, is a great manufacturer, and its weapons are top notch, but the facility leaves a lot to be desired. The unions are destroying colt.
In the end you cannot go wrong buying either and I would carry either into battle with confidence. Why is the union responsible for substandard facilities? Sounds more like a management problem.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,263
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,263 |
Well I don't know about the FN AR, but my FN Scar 16s is heads and tails above the Colt Competition I used to have!! Hopefully FN does a better job with the quality of the triggers they send out on their ARs. My friend had the pleasure of spending $2800 on a SCAR 17s and got the worst trigger I've ever pulled. So bad it ruined the rifle. You shouldn't spend that much and get a [bleep] trigger. The QC department at FN should have never let that one leave the factory.
Scott
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,621
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,621 |
I can't comment on the FN rifles other than they look well made and "feel" like a solid rifle. I have never actually shot one. However, I just got a new Colt LE6920 and am very pleased with its fit and finish. The receivers have absolutely zero play between them, the front sight post is pinned perfect (not canted) all moving parts are smooth and finished well, and no blemishes in machining or anodizing. I know this isn't the case for all rifles coming out of Colt's factory but I was very pleased.
John 8:12 "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474 |
Well I don't know about the FN AR, but my FN Scar 16s is heads and tails above the Colt Competition I used to have!! Hopefully FN does a better job with the quality of the triggers they send out on their ARs. My friend had the pleasure of spending $2800 on a SCAR 17s and got the worst trigger I've ever pulled. So bad it ruined the rifle. You shouldn't spend that much and get a [bleep] trigger. The QC department at FN should have never let that one leave the factory. never seen a bad trigger ruin a rifle. Won a handful of perry medals one year before I learned to work on my own m14 after it started doubling and a guy ran some Emory paper in there. Pull was around 10 pounds for two weeks shooting
We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474 |
I can't comment on the FN rifles other than they look well made and "feel" like a solid rifle. I have never actually shot one. However, I just got a new Colt LE6920 and am very pleased with its fit and finish. The receivers have absolutely zero play between them, the front sight post is pinned perfect (not canted) all moving parts are smooth and finished well, and no blemishes in machining or anodizing. I know this isn't the case for all rifles coming out of Colt's factory but I was very pleased. And while I agree on what u see from.on colt on ur particular gun being nice I Not one of those issues makes it shoot better by a noticeable difference
We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,621
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,621 |
I can't comment on the FN rifles other than they look well made and "feel" like a solid rifle. I have never actually shot one. However, I just got a new Colt LE6920 and am very pleased with its fit and finish. The receivers have absolutely zero play between them, the front sight post is pinned perfect (not canted) all moving parts are smooth and finished well, and no blemishes in machining or anodizing. I know this isn't the case for all rifles coming out of Colt's factory but I was very pleased. And while I agree on what u see from.on colt on ur particular gun being nice I Not one of those issues makes it shoot better by a noticeable difference I agree mostly. I have had better accuracy with tight fitting receivers vs loose ones. Although, that mainly affects the shooter, not necessarily the rifles mechanical accuracy. Having not shot an FN, I left accuracy and reliability out as I can't compare. The Colt is accurate for what it is and obviously very reliable.
John 8:12 "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,625
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,625 |
Probably no major difference, but from everything I have read FN is prohibited from contract by using the same exact processes on it's non-US military M16 variants while Colt is not. Look up information on Technical Data Packages for more details.
"My message to my troops is if you see anybody carrying a gun on the streets of Milwaukee, we'll put them on the ground, take the gun away and then decide whether you have a right to carry it." - Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,163
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,163 |
I've been issued both Colt and FN M4s, and there's no practical difference between them functionally or in terms of accuracy. Would be proud to own either. Issued by whom? Is FN now making M4's? I know Colt lost the DOD contract but it was contested, never heard who wound up with it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,908
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,908 |
Issued by whom? Is FN now making M4's? I know Colt lost the DOD contract but it was contested, never heard who wound up with it.
Yes, they are: http://kitup.military.com/2013/02/army-awards-m4m4a1-contract-fn.html
Last edited by antelope_sniper; 09/20/14.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,163
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,163 |
I hadn't been paying attention, that's good to know.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,263
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,263 |
never seen a bad trigger ruin a rifle. Won a handful of perry medals one year before I learned to work on my own m14 after it started doubling and a guy ran some Emory paper in there. Pull was around 10 pounds for two weeks shooting I guess I have unrealistic expectations that a $2800 rifle should do better than a 10+LB 3 stage trigger full of grit. I expect a decent one when you spend that kind of money.
Scott
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300 |
its reasonable to expect a decent rifle for $2800.00, if for certain it had a bad trigger for that money they can keep it. I researched the SCAR 308, check out the story on it being imported etc etc. lots of stuff FN does is kind of looney like that 5-7 pistol, and that abortion 308 based on the hunting BAR, magazines 40 each I think. I would get the Colt, I am familiar with that brand.
by the way you can get a cheaper but equally bad trigger from Ruger the SR-762 for about half the price, and it only takes a $230 Giessle to fix it.
Last edited by jimmyp; 09/20/14.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,621
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,621 |
by the way you can get a cheaper but equally bad trigger from Ruger the SR-762 for about half the price, and it only takes a $230 Giessle to fix it.
Ha, a Geissele will make many triggers feel like crap. How's that Ruger working out compared to the DPMS?
John 8:12 "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300 |
I would recommend the gun to a friend with no qualms. It is a tad heavy but accurate enough to suit me, factory trigger is an abortion. Of the 3 I tried over the last 11 months I like it the best.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474 |
never seen a bad trigger ruin a rifle. Won a handful of perry medals one year before I learned to work on my own m14 after it started doubling and a guy ran some Emory paper in there. Pull was around 10 pounds for two weeks shooting I guess I have unrealistic expectations that a $2800 rifle should do better than a 10+LB 3 stage trigger full of grit. I expect a decent one when you spend that kind of money. I don't disagree, but a trigger doesn't make a rifle innaccurate or unreliable typically. That was my point. I base my take on a gun by its accuracy and reliability. Not that I'd spend 2800 on a rifle anyway, I can build a better gun with a good trigger for half that, but thats not my call anyway. Just saying triggers are generally one of the easiest fixes out there.
We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,622
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,622 |
I've been issued both Colt and FN M4s, and there's no practical difference between them functionally or in terms of accuracy. Would be proud to own either. Issued by whom? Is FN now making M4's? I know Colt lost the DOD contract but it was contested, never heard who wound up with it. Issued by the U.S. Army, units I've been assigned to have had both manufactures. Of interest, a past rifle I was issued had been refurbed up to M16A1 standards ( I've been around a while) it had a 4 digit serial, and was stamped "Colt XM-15" on the receiver. It also had 4 rebuild stamps on it, and this was in 1991. You just don't see that any more, since there have been so many new weapons made and pumped into the system due to wear and tear in theatre.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 453
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 453 |
I have an FN15 with the 20" barrel and it is really nice. I also have an older 6920.
With comparing newer production Colts and the new FN AR's,from what I saw the FN's have a slightly nicer finish and quality. The new FN is pretty accurate, although it doesn't like steel case ammo. My 6920 will eat anything, but it also has a few thousand rounds through it.
I would highly recommend the FN. There do not seem to be many around; I had to hunt for mine.
|
|
|
|
677 members (10gaugeman, 1beaver_shooter, 12344mag, 1eyedmule, 10ring1, 1lessdog, 64 invisible),
3,073
guests, and
1,325
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,698
Posts18,456,710
Members73,909
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|