24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 18,942
M
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 18,942
Is the 40 cal flat point FMJ any better at stopping than 9mm or 45ACP roundnose FMJ?

BP-B2

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 32,044
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 32,044
I would think any flat point FMJ would beat a round nose FMJ


A Doe walks out of the woods today and says, that is the last time I'm going to do that for Two Bucks.
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 18,942
M
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 18,942
I would too, but wondering if anybody has any experiences to relate.

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 17,019
V
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
V
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 17,019
I am going to say yes.

On another note, it will be interesting when the details come out on the shooting in MO. Caliber, bullet style, weight.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
L
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
L
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
Why? I dont see any reason to carry any sort of FMJ round for defensive use, when bullet technology is where it is now.

IC B2

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,846
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,846
He never mentioned 'defensive use', only stopping....and the flat 40 stops the hell outta porkypines....

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 18,942
M
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 18,942
Just conversation/curiosity.

I carry 180gr HydraShok most of the time in the 40.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
L
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
L
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
Gotcha...

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
Flat points have several advantages over round nose or ball. They transfer energy better and cavitate better, they have farther straight-line penetration in fluid mediums, are less likely to tumble in fluid mediums.

I don't know about stopping. If it was a 'soft' thing, expanding projectiles are far better statistically. If it is a tough thing, and deep penetration is a must, then non-expanding flat points are the best of all compromises.


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,285
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,285
I wish I could find the old article about this, it appeared back in the 80's when the US military was looking to replace the 1911 with someone's 9mm.

The Germans found out over a century ago that a flat pointed FMJ was far and away more effective than any round nose bullet. The one they tried was basically a truncated cone shape with what today we would call a tiny meplat. Don't know why they never adopted it and kept the round nose configuration.


Gunnery, gunnery, gunnery.
Hit the target, all else is twaddle!
IC B3

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,634
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,634
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Is the 40 cal flat point FMJ any better at stopping than 9mm or 45ACP roundnose FMJ?
I have no experience with that particular bullet. But my observations wiht other cartridges is that their is a noticeable difference between a round nose and a flat nose.

Example

I shot a Fox that was trying to get to our chickens with a 9mm FMJ and while it did run away, it seemed somewhat less than impressed. I went out the next day and I never found a dead fox, and the blood trail was small and short (meaning the wound managed to seal.

I've shot coyote's with .38 Special 148 & 158 wadcutters and they give more of a reaction to the hit, and in each case I did find the dead animal.

Flat points just destroy more flesh IME.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,797
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,797
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Is the 40 cal flat point FMJ any better at stopping than 9mm or 45ACP roundnose FMJ?
I have no experience with that particular bullet. But my observations with other cartridges is that their is a noticeable difference between a round nose and a flat nose.

Example

I shot a Fox that was trying to get to our chickens with a 9mm FMJ and while it did run away, it seemed somewhat less than impressed. I went out the next day and I never found a dead fox, and the blood trail was small and short (meaning the wound managed to seal.

I've shot coyote's with .38 Special 148 & 158 wadcutters and they give more of a reaction to the hit, and in each case I did find the dead animal.

Flat points just destroy more flesh IME.



I agree 100% with your findings as they have been mine as well. Now heres the questions. Full wadcutters and SWC both have sharp shoulders on the nose but the 40 s&w flat nose bullet does not so would they be the same or would the flat nose on the 40 act more like a round nose due to it lacking the sharp shoulder?

Last edited by dsink; 08/19/14.
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,629
S
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,629
Originally Posted by dsink
Full wadcutters and SWC both have sharp shoulders on the nose but the 40 s&w flat nose bullet does not so would they be the same or would the flat nose on the 40 act more like a round nose due to it lacking the sharp shoulder?


General Hatcher would have said so.


'Four legs good, two legs baaaad."
----------------------------------------------
"Jimmy, some of it's magic,
Some of it's tragic,
But I had a good life all the way."
(Jimmy Buffett)

SotG
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,634
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,634
Originally Posted by dsink
I agree 100% with your findings as they have been mine as well. Now heres the questions. Full wadcutters and SWC both have sharp shoulders on the nose but the 40 s&w flat nose bullet does not so would they be the same or would the flat nose on the 40 act more like a round nose due to it lacking the sharp shoulder?

Well from what I learned doing ballistics gelatin testing in the early '90's the actual tissue destroyed is directly proportional to the frontal diameter of the projectile. The bullet meplat isn't as flat or sharp as something like a SWC or WFN, but still the frontal area that crushes tissue will be wider, and thus more tissue destroyed.

Now here's the question, is it enough to make a change? It could... I guess it depends on what you want from your bullet.

I know the military looked at flat nose 9mm bullets back in the '80's. I remember reading a report of a test of flat nose 124 grain bullets and the bullet out-performed the round nose in everything but barrier penetration. And that killed the whole idea since barrier penetration was of paramount importance to the Army.

So the military who has to use FMJ's has passed on the FMJ-FP. For a civilian, I'm a bit at a loss as to why you would want a FMJ-FP for defense when you have JHP's available. Unless of course, you weren't using the round for defense, but more for hunting, then there could be some merit.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,336
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,336
A better stopper if consistent straight line penetration is a factor...which common sense would usually dictate.


It ain't all burritos and strippers my friends...
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,058
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,058
Double Tap makes a .40 200-grain WFNGC at 1,050 fps outta G23.

It'd do a lot more cutting and crushing than the practice ammo, but are priced accordingly.

We can be arrested in Tennessee for using rifle or pistol FMJ on critters. Prohibited from even using CF handguns on small game! Total horseshit.


�When in doubt, I whip it out.� Uncle Ted
[Linked Image]
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,276
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,276
A good 180gr FNFMJ would be a good choice for woods carry....where penetration is number one....

I have a couple 100 just for that reason

[Linked Image]

Last edited by Buckeye; 08/19/14.
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,374
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,374
Originally Posted by bea175
I would think any flat point FMJ would beat a round nose FMJ


I agree. And I think it's give through-and-through penetration, which is what I like.


�If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.�
***US President James Madison***
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,374
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,374
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Is the 40 cal flat point FMJ any better at stopping than 9mm or 45ACP roundnose FMJ?
I have no experience with that particular bullet. But my observations wiht other cartridges is that their is a noticeable difference between a round nose and a flat nose.

Example

I shot a Fox that was trying to get to our chickens with a 9mm FMJ and while it did run away, it seemed somewhat less than impressed. I went out the next day and I never found a dead fox, and the blood trail was small and short (meaning the wound managed to seal.

I've shot coyote's with .38 Special 148 & 158 wadcutters and they give more of a reaction to the hit, and in each case I did find the dead animal.

Flat points just destroy more flesh IME.


Tell us about your advanced voodoo bullet picking strategy. Does Rosie O'Donnell buy your ammo for you? Are you using Rocky Road +P?


�If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.�
***US President James Madison***
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,812
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,812
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Originally Posted by dsink
I agree 100% with your findings as they have been mine as well. Now heres the questions. Full wadcutters and SWC both have sharp shoulders on the nose but the 40 s&w flat nose bullet does not so would they be the same or would the flat nose on the 40 act more like a round nose due to it lacking the sharp shoulder?

Well from what I learned doing ballistics gelatin testing in the early '90's the actual tissue destroyed is directly proportional to the frontal diameter of the projectile. The bullet meplat isn't as flat or sharp as something like a SWC or WFN, but still the frontal area that crushes tissue will be wider, and thus more tissue destroyed.

Now here's the question, is it enough to make a change? It could... I guess it depends on what you want from your bullet.

I know the military looked at flat nose 9mm bullets back in the '80's. I remember reading a report of a test of flat nose 124 grain bullets and the bullet out-performed the round nose in everything but barrier penetration. And that killed the whole idea since barrier penetration was of paramount importance to the Army.

So the military who has to use FMJ's has passed on the FMJ-FP. For a civilian, I'm a bit at a loss as to why you would want a FMJ-FP for defense when you have JHP's available. Unless of course, you weren't using the round for defense, but more for hunting, then there could be some merit.


I'd say a good flat point hard cast would be an excellent self defense bullet and I base that on wound channels in animals. Whitworth and I have both taken pigs with JHP's and flat point hard cast. Upon careful examination of the wound channel we were unable to determine much if any difference. The problem with the FMJFP's is the MEPLAT is too small and they do not always stay nose forward IME.
I do shot and use JHP's but they are not the end all be all as many seem to believe. A proper meplat hard cast will give them a run for their money in wound channel size as well as penetrate deeper.



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
336 members (007FJ, 06hunter59, 01Foreman400, 10Glocks, 160user, 12344mag, 32 invisible), 2,130 guests, and 928 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,729
Posts18,400,838
Members73,822
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.097s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8985 MB (Peak: 1.0510 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 11:22:00 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS