24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 43
C
CodyM Offline OP
Campfire Greenhorn
OP Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
C
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 43
I have a situation occurring with a rifle that I can't explain and hopefully somebody can offer some help. It is a Remington model 7 SS in 7mm SAUM with a 2-7 Leupold Rifleman scope on it. On consecutive weekends I shot the 2 following loads. Same brass, primer, and powder was used for both sessions.

175 Hornady interlock, 53.0 grain of H4350 and velocity was 2692, 2698, and 2703. Zeroed this gun at 200 yards and 300 yard trajectory was minus 4 inches and 400 yard trajectory was minus 17 inches.

the next weekend using the same brass, primers, and powder I loaded 150 Barnes TTSX, 56.0 grains of H4350 and velocity was 2931 and 2943. I zeroed at 200 yards and 300 yard trajectory was minus 8" and 400 yard trajectory was minus 24 inches.

The velocity difference is about 200 fps and the BC is within .01 so why in the world is that slower bullet flatter? I zeroed both loads at 200 before shooting at 300 and 400 and temp was within 10 degrees both Saturdays. Has anybody else ever had a particular bullet/rifle/powder combo that was unusually flat like this? to get that same trajectory on the Hornady Ballistic calculator I have to up the BC to .55 and the velocity to 3050. Thanks for any ideas.

BP-B2

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,901
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,901
Can't explain why the 175 flies so flat, but I would guess (based on some experience) that the Barnes BC isn't nearly the .450 they suggest.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
P
prm Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
Be interesting to get the velocity at both muzzle and at the target.

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 38,725
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 38,725
BCs seem to be truly magical things.


Not a real member - just an ordinary guy who appreciates being able to hang around and say something once in awhile.

Happily Trapped In the Past (Thanks, Joe)

Not only a less than minimally educated person, but stupid and out of touch as well.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,561
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,561
The slower bullet isn't flatter. Whether slow or fast, heavy or light, bullets fall at the same velocity. It's a pretty common phenomenen for slower bullets to hit higher on a target and the reason is that the slower bullet gives the barrel just a tiny bit more time to rise before the bullet exits the barrel.

IC B2

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,336
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,336
I do have a verified BC on the 175, but your results make no sense for either one.

If you have only shot a few rounds in load testing, and depending on how accurate your rifle is, you may not be able to accurately find the center of the groups with a small number of rounds fired.

There are too many variables to accurately predict trajectory without some additional testing. With limited test results you will only be in the ballpark.


It ain't all burritos and strippers my friends...
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,828
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,828
Well most of the published tables are just mathematical predictions, the only real way of knowing its buy shooting and shooting a lot, put a lot more rounds down range, keep good notes on each shot fired along with, the Alt, Temp and humidity of were you are after a bit you will have a good average, make up your own chart and then just go hunting! I use to be into this sort of thing, but after a while, I figured that if I just do a 200 yard zero and keep on hair, I am going to make good hits as far as I have any business shooting big game! Have fun with it, after all its suppose to be a fun enjoyable hobby!


"Any idiot can face a crisis,it's the day-to-day living that wears you out."

Anton Chekhov


Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,813
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,813
Originally Posted by Grumulkin
The slower bullet isn't flatter. Whether slow or fast, heavy or light, bullets fall at the same velocity. It's a pretty common phenomenen for slower bullets to hit higher on a target and the reason is that the slower bullet gives the barrel just a tiny bit more time to rise before the bullet exits the barrel.


Not sure I follow this logic. They are both zeroed the same and shot at identical ranges. Pushing the same bullet to faster speeds with the same zero always results in a flatter trajectory with the faster load.

If you don't change the sights and at 'closer' ranges the slower bullet may shoot higher due to the phenomenon you describe. Happens all the time with pistols - if you don't adjust the sights.


Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
It seems that more shots would tell the tale, but if they give the same result over and over, go with it! Nothing wrong with bullets flying flat. A lot of factors affect a bullet's bc in a given rifle, including altitude and temp, and the only real way to know what is going on is through repeatability.

I'd recommend you sight that gun in for 250 though. It will stretch your trajectory flatter farther. I get a mpbr of 300yd with loads going about 2700.


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,561
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,561
Originally Posted by bwinters
They are both zeroed the same and shot at identical ranges. Pushing the same bullet to faster speeds with the same zero always results in a flatter trajectory with the faster load.


That is true if barrel movement from recoil is taken out of the equation.

Faster forward velocity means less time in flight and thus less time for the bullet to fall.

IC B3

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
Originally Posted by Grumulkin
Originally Posted by bwinters
They are both zeroed the same and shot at identical ranges. Pushing the same bullet to faster speeds with the same zero always results in a flatter trajectory with the faster load.


That is true if barrel movement from recoil is taken out of the equation.

Faster forward velocity means less time in flight and thus less time for the bullet to fall.


You may be overthinking this a bit....


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
This had me puzzled a bit....but looking at some ballistic tables, there is not a huge difference between the two....the OP's drop figures for the 150 and 175 seem to be reversed but are still within about 7 inches of one another at 400 yards.

I'd shoot some more.

Is the OP doing all this shooting on the same scope setting (power)?




The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20,379
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20,379
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Can't explain why the 175 flies so flat, but I would guess (based on some experience) that the Barnes BC isn't nearly the .450 they suggest.


This. Also make sure the barnes are 150 grains..


Originally Posted by captain seafire
I replace valve cover gaskets every 50K, if they don't need them sooner...
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,046
A
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
A
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,046
Hence, the continual comment from experienced people that "Your mileage may vary".

Every combination of components is unique to a given barrel and chamber. If I had to guess, I wouldn't, simply because I have a suspicion I can't prove.

To "Learn" why this is occurring, I would repeat the exact test as long as you have components and powder from the same lot. If any one component changes, the test is worthless.

If it repeats, do it again in a couple of months when the weather cools off and be sure to record the temperatures off your smartphone with the data.

John


When truth is ignored, it does not change an untruth from remaining a lie.
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,932
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,932
It's my understanding that BC is a mathematical calculation based up on bullet shape and other factors. Optimistic calculations to support sales might be a possibility. I've never paid much attention to BC, giving more importance to other factors in my bullet selection. Mabe MD might add some thoughts in this regard.


Beware of thieves, scammers and dishonest members on the "Fire" classifieds. Ya there is a thief here too. Whatever!!

They're all around the CampFire and everywhere.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,046
A
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
A
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,046
Ed,
BC is also a calculation based on a particular velocity. Because the OP used the SAUM case, he is smack in the middle of commercially applied averages so the BC "should" be "representative" for "comparison" purposes within the caliber.

John


When truth is ignored, it does not change an untruth from remaining a lie.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20,379
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20,379
Originally Posted by MissouriEd
It's my understanding that BC is a mathematical calculation based up on bullet shape and other factors. Optimistic calculations to support sales might be a possibility. I've never paid much attention to BC, giving more importance to other factors in my bullet selection. Mabe MD might add some thoughts in this regard.


It's not a posibility with barnes, it's a fact. Still good bullets, though..


Originally Posted by captain seafire
I replace valve cover gaskets every 50K, if they don't need them sooner...
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,599
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,599
Quote
Is the OP doing all this shooting on the same scope setting (power)?


Good question.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20,379
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20,379
If you're shooting zero out at distance, not using dots or dials, that wouldn't matter, right?


Originally Posted by captain seafire
I replace valve cover gaskets every 50K, if they don't need them sooner...
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,599
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,599
Originally Posted by Rancho_Loco
If you're shooting zero out at distance, not using dots or dials, that wouldn't matter, right?


On some scopes it does.

If you take an older 3-9 Redfield and back the power off from 9 to 7 powder and you just raised you POI by 2 MOA. Most shooters never notice this because they only shoot on either the highest or lowest setting, which will typically have the same point of impact.

I haven't tested the particular scope mentioned in the OP to see if it suffers from this affliction or not, but it's a common one.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,901
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,901
Ed,

While for many years most bullet companies calculated BC's, partly due to the very reason you suggested, many are switching to actually shooting them under controlled conditions. So it depends on the company.

On the other hand, recent research by Bryan Litz indicates the actual BC varies more to rifling twist than was previously believed. Actually, until fairly recently a lot of shooters felt too much twist "over-stabilized" a bullet, reducing BC, by Litz's research (involving actual shooting) indicates that over-stabilizing actually increases BC up to a certain point.

Litz's shooting essentially shows Hornady's listed BC for the 7mm 175 Spire Point Spire is spot-on, but I don't think he's tested the 150 TTSX. As noted earlier, however, I doubt its BC is the .450 Barnes lists. Among other things, Nosler's listed BC's are pretty good, and they claim .435 for the 150-grain Ballistic Tip, a noticeably sleeker bullet than the 150 TTSX. And Berger's BC (derived from Litz tests) for the .30 150 VLD is similar.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,444
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,444
I don't know if this is what's in play here, but in the history of long range shooting, there is a phenomenon known as "compensation" where a barrel whipped differently for different loads, and released bullets at different initial trajectories. The Enfield with it's flexy rear locking action was one such rifle, and companies such as Fulton of Bisley (not Fulton Armory in the US) would "regulate" Enfields to allow rounds to converge at the desired range (generally 800-1000 yards). The standard barrel M14 was another rifle documented to "compensate" (though to a lesser degree than the Enfield).

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,444
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,444
My guess is if you play with BC's in JBM, you won't see the POI differences the OP is showing. I'd bet other than BC.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,336
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,336
Tested BC is a reliable predictor of bullet performance, and inaccurate measurements and haphazard testing does not affect BC or how the bullet actually performs.


It ain't all burritos and strippers my friends...
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
722 members (117LBS, 10gaugemag, 12344mag, 01Foreman400, 10Glocks, 77 invisible), 2,685 guests, and 1,309 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,683
Posts18,399,735
Members73,820
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.146s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9210 MB (Peak: 1.0755 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-28 22:21:13 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS