Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Cruz or Perry who gets your money?

Yep,,,, vote early and vote often.

Still �Neither�

Keep trying

I voted for Romney too but look at it this way...with Romney in the Whitehouse, when Sandy Hook went down, if you'd combined the Democrats with liberal, compromising Republicans, you'd have probably had enough votes that we'd now be under a new AWB and have universal registration, at the very least. Nobody trusts an obvious traitor like Obama. It's the compromisers and appeasers who may be our undoing. If we have another McRomney nominated, my next choice may indeed be to stay at home and pout. Not really. I'll be actively voting in the Senate and House races as well as the state and local ones.

Palin ain't running chair sniffer.

She found out that you can't just throw up your hands and walk away from the white house when the going gets tuff.


McCain and Palin,,,,, now THERE was a wasted vote Ethan.

Ronald Reagan was a Dem. turned Republican...

Neither will win the 2016 Republican nomination. Neither will get my money or support.

Ronald was highly overrated but still a good illustration of how even the Democrats back then were more conservative than most Republicans today.

To mol answer the original posit, to me Rand Paul is still the front-runner. He is the closest in his ideals to my own. Rand has certainly been sucking up awfully hard though. I won't put him out in front of Perry as far as naked political posturing, but he's getting close. Cruz seems the most genuine of the three.

As compared to who?

Reagan also ran for POTUS 3 times.
Romney needs to give it another try.
Perry would be fine if he can avoid the dumb chit he did last time.
Cruz,paultard,airpalin cant win a national election.

dave

Because your a mouth piece don't mean your an executive. Even if they support the same ideas you do it isnt a guarantee they can manage a country. Take a lesson from the Democrats . Maybe they didnt but They should have learned this with Obama. To them he had great ideas but he had no skill or ability to be an executive to legitimately move those ideas forward. Since our only choice given here is Perry or Cruz I would have go with Perry because he has the experience of being a Governor. I know great salesmen that cant keep their checkbook straight or get along in a group. And I have seen execs that did a good job keeping thing together at the office but couldnt sell a hot meal to starving eskimo.

Reagan in 1962: "I didn't leave the Democratic Party. The party left me."

Neither,
Cruz will do or say anything that will keep his name in the headlines.

If the Republican Party is stupid enough to nominate either Cruz or Perry, Hillary wins.

You guys had better start thinking legitimate conservative before it's too late. If Obama's landsliding Romney didn't get your attention, it's likely nothing will.

Do not forget this fact: authentic conservatives will never again vote for a liberal, neocon, RINO. Nominate another another and you'll assure Hillary's Oval Office waltz.

Cruz and Perry for vice

BOWSINGER,

I didn't leave the Republican Party. It left me when it was neocon co-opted.

On the other side of the coin, there's a ton of moderate conservatives that won't vote for a hard core nominee.

So how do you win if not a democrat?

Republicans began losing when hey were infiltrated by neocons who have co-opted the party converting in to the party of Democratic Light,

The ONLY way a conservative can win is via electoral college reform. Electoral vote must be apportioned in proportion to percent of vote won. That will give a third party a very real chance of pullin' off victory. Until then, one of the two dominant parties that are really two sides of the same coin will continue to rule, for we haven't been governed since at least FDR and probably as far back as Wilson.

We will vote for the most conservative candidate who can win.

I miss Sarah Palin.