Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire What would the Republican party look like if....

Right.

Evangelical principles weren't the issue either.

It comes down to liberals being liberal.

I don't define dropping the attempt to legislate morality as more liberal.

I don't think it should be a conservative platform period

The idea is among many is you *aren't* a conservative unless you push a pro-life, anti-gay marriage agenda. If that changed, then that swings many more voters in the camp of Republican.

if that's the case, then we proved that Latinos will not be voting republican, and that single women will not be voting republican

the republican party should just disband now.

They aren't voting conservative either.

If a conservative actually runs, maybe we'd find out.

Republicans got their a$$es handed to them in the last two presidential elections by the worst president we've ever had since I've been alive. And still, they vigorously defend their losing strategies...and vow to continue their losing strategies.

Those that embrace marxism can't also embrace conservatism

I'm sure we all have seen the recent video's showing black men telling their peers what horrendous damage the democrat party has done to their race.

Of course, the facts of this destruction are irrefutable and clearly detailed.

I've seldom seen such presentations and it appears they are getting more prolific.


Should these truthful declarations get traction, it could change the shape of politics in this country, and the climate in this country, for a long time.

I know it may seem like a long shot to many, but I wonder. Truth is a powerful thing and can be used as a powerful weapon in the right hands. For this truth and theses circumstances, those hands have to be Black.

Everyone understands there is an unsettling malaise in this country of apprehension due to racial hatred and fear. Also, a huge concern for many regarding the way politics are playing out. Both have contributed to growing polarization and people talking past each other, rather than to each other to air differences, gain understanding, and achieve resolution.

I also believe it's clear that the current administration has no intention to resolve these problems, but chooses to exacerbate them for their own purposes and gains. They would be better served, in their demented minds, by a revolution than a solution.

So I would rather concern myself with what the GOP would look like with more, many more, groups identifying with it than being cast out from it, and what it will take to make that happen.

They'll run, but the country will never get a chance to vote for them. The RNC and Wall Street will see to that.

Very true, and that says about all that needs to be said for the GOP does it not?

Nixon said something to the affect that you run to the right to win the primary, you runt to the left to win the general, and you government from the middle. That seemed to work for him but I don't know if that's valid today.

Nixon never won as big as Reagan did. There is your blue print as to how to do it again.

The 2010 election proved we still have the numbers, the demographic numbers to do it again.

You can have conservative Marxists within the context of Marxism.

Not even a Reagan blueprint will work today.

Because you'd rather just hang your hat on misleading claims, instead of finding the truth.

I took the time to do the math. All of the statistics are out there, it just takes a calculator and a willingness to not parrot what MSN and CNN tell you.

In the 2012 election:

67% of unmarried women voted for Obama.

Of the 67% that voted for Obama, 52.24% were women of color.
47.76% of that 67% were white.

Thus:
31% of unmarried women were white and voted for Obama.
31% of unmarried women were white and voted for Romney.
35% of unmarried women were of color and voted for Obama.
2% voted for other candidates.

As predicted, you were wrong and misleading.

In an election where nearly 60% of whites voted against Obama and 93% of Blacks voted for Obama, to ignore race is foolish and ignorant.

The 2010 election proved we still have the numbers, the demographic numbers to do it again.

It starts anew next week.

posted Hot Air on October 30, 2014
CBS poll: GOP lead in generic Congressional ballot similar to final 2010 poll

THAT is CBS talking!

Sure.

using your numbers I still don't see where you think I'm wrong. 31% of single white women voted for Obama, 31% voted for Romney.

Are you saying the 31% of single white women that voted for Obama would vote for a more hard core conservative than Romney?


other wise, my statement stands

the majority of single women voted for Obama and would likely vote democrat in the election and race is meaningless because they'd likely vote democrat in the same numbers again.

if you think I'm being disingenuous on this, then please tell me why you think the majority of single women will vote Republican, otherwise, your protest seem like alot of wasted effort.

if 31% of white single women voted for Obama, the same % as Romney, that doesn't bode well for the next republican candidate in my eyes.

Except when republicans run as pro life, they win. When they're wishy washy, they lose.