24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 563
D
Dooger Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 563
I see this is pretty popular for lightweight rifles. Other than weight savings, why?

What are you using it for? What ranges? Do you use a different scope for load work up?

Any other comments?

I'm trying to figure out if I want a 3.5-10 or 2.5-8...

Thanks

BP-B2

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,996
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,996
IMO, the 2.5-8x36 is one of the most versatile, and useful scopes, you can mount on a hunting rifle.
Relatively lightweight, very durable, with great optics. I have them mounted on three rifles, with two more sitting on the shelf as spares (never needed them, so far). Mine all have duplex reticles, useful in most light situations and easy and quick to get on target.
At 8x, there is plenty of magnification for longish shots, and when mounted up on a DG rifle (my .375 Ruger wears one), 2.5x magnification is low enough for close shots at big stuff. I used mine on African Lion, at extremely close range.
I have three 3.5-10's on my rifles, two with CDS turrets, and one with a 50mm objective lens, on my .257 Wby, for very low-light shooting at whitetails across my hayfields.
In general, however, I don't think the 3.5-10 is as versatile as the 2.5-8, but it is nice to have both.


I'd rather be a free man in my grave, than living as a puppet or a slave....
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,710
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,710
On such a rifle I don't believe you'd need a different scope for load workup. This is particularly true if you use a target with an aim point whose size and shape is well matched to the magnification/reticle/distance combination.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,089
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,089
2.5-8 will do anything I need a scope to do in Michigan, slight chance its short on magnification for real long shots out west but I doubt it. Its easy to get behind and good in low light. I had a 3.5-10 on my short actions and IMO it made them feel top heavy, the smaller 2.5-8 seems to fit the gun better in size and weight and makes the overall balance better.

For a hunting scope its hard to beat IMO....


It�s a magazine not a clip......

Advice is seldom welcome, and those who need it the most, like it the least.�
- Lord Chesterfield. 1750
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,530
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,530
It is my favorite scope. Perfect in size, weight, and power range. The optics are great to my eyes. I've done load development with them from from 270s to a 338 Win and used them at ranges over 500 yards.

IC B2

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,296
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,296
After owning and using 2 of them, a Vari X III and a VX3 in 2.5-8, if money was no object I would replace all my other scopes with them (except my lever guns, maybe). Durable, light, good glass, and just plain looks good, especially on lighter, slimmer rifles such as Mod. 70 fwts, Ruger Ultralights, etc. I don't think you can go wrong with one.
John

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,988
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,988
I'll just add that I agree with the previous comments. Mine is on my 375H&H. I do load development at 200 yards. Never thought is was a disadvantage. If you can't make a shot with 8x, it's probably longer than you should be shooting.


I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all.
Jack O'Connor
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 487
J
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
J
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 487
Why? Just to be different from all the hoards of literally millions of 3-9x40s.........LOl!!!!!!!!

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,364
D
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,364
The 2.5-8 is my favorite scope. It is shorter and gives more clearance when mounted low than a 3-9x40 or 3.5-10x40.

It is as useful at short range as a 1.75-6 [I bought one for my .375 and now wish I had spent the money on a 2.5-8x36] and better at longe range.

The lowest setting allows me to see the target easily with both eyes open, I use that in close cover.

It has enough power on the upper end to see .30 cal bullet strikes at 200 yds and .22 strikes at 100.

I am used to the range finder option.

I use it for big game and varmints. I have them on an 84L Montanna '06, a M70 SS FW '06 and a Classic M70 SS .338. I plan to have one on my .375 by next fall.

I tend to hunt careas of close cover and like to stalk so I rarely shoot a first shot at game past 300 yards. In the last twenty years I have shot 4 deer at around 285 yards, an elk at 250 or so and an antelope this year at 268 yards as near as I could tell.

I have had opportunities at longer ranges and would take one if the presentation was very good. The 2.5-8 scopes are certainly up to the task. I had a very nice antelope in my sights at a bit over 400 yards this year and it was easy to see. It was rump on to me though. I had it ranged so the holdover would have been easy enough. The wind was about 30 mph though. I passed.

No, I do not use a different scope for load work up.

The 3.5-10 is a nice scope too. I put those kind of scopes on 7mm and .300 mags though.


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
S
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
S
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
One of my least favorite Leupold scopes, though ahead of the 4.5-14 and 1.75-6x.



"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
IC B3

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,813
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,813
I'm with the crowd. I have 4 sitting on my main hunting rifles, including a 375 Ruger. They are a very good value for the money, has generous eye relief, and decent glass. Whats not to like?

I also have a couple of 3.5-10 on rifles, one with their CDS dial. I haven't played much with it but it does seem to work. I need to put it through a bunch more paces before I proclaim it good.


Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,664
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,664
One common comment on the 2.5x8 is the short mounting length, good for short actions, not so handy for some longer actions. I personally think the power range is ideal for most hunting.

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,550
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,550
I'll take the 3.5-10 every time

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,094
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,094
Originally Posted by Dooger
I see this is pretty popular for lightweight rifles. Other than weight savings, why?

What are you using it for? What ranges? Do you use a different scope for load work up?

Any other comments?

I'm trying to figure out if I want a 3.5-10 or 2.5-8...

Thanks


The reason(s) defy logic. It's just like people spending several thousand dollars on wristwatch with little gold crown on dial when something like Citizen, Seiko,....mobile phone tells time more accurately.

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,813
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,813
Not sure what your point is?


Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 563
D
Dooger Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 563
Me either...

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,879
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,879
I have at least 10 2.5-8 Leupolds on rifles and three others in the safe. Best scope for any of my big game hunting. Even have one on my 223 for varmints and coyotes.

Only have 2 3.5-10s.


"Whether you think you can or you think you can't, you're right."
Henry Ford

If it's tourist season, why can't we shoot them?
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,145
C
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
C
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,145
I've got a couple of them but they're not my favorites. For some reason they seem limited in low light situations, the 3.5-10 seems to be significantly brighter. The short mounting length does seem to look better on short action rifles, but other than aesthetics there's no real reason I can think of to pick one over the 3.5-10

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 735
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 735
probably one of, if not the, best pure hunting scope around.


Hunt Africa while you can
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,089
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,089
Originally Posted by Steelhead
One of my least favorite Leupold scopes, though ahead of the 4.5-14 and 1.75-6x.



Really?!? Why the dislike Scott?


It�s a magazine not a clip......

Advice is seldom welcome, and those who need it the most, like it the least.�
- Lord Chesterfield. 1750
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
139 members (10Glocks, 2UP, 300_savage, 257 mag, 160user, 35, 12 invisible), 1,825 guests, and 832 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,728
Posts18,400,778
Members73,822
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.115s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.8905 MB (Peak: 1.0284 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 10:00:38 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS