Brand new, it will likely be MOA-ish, from what I've seen with mine, and heard from others.
Ruger has realized that good barrels sell, and for the past 20 years or so, since they started making their own, their barrels are usually very good. If you like the rifle, jump on it.
To elaborate, I don't think the 1A's are quite as accurate as the B's or V's, on average. But I'd only worked with a A in .30-40, and a #1S in .45-70, both black pad, Ruger-made barrels. Both of them are around 1 to 1.5 MOA with selected loads, and that's what others have reported for similar rifles. Several of my B's or V's are sub-MOA with their best loads. And I have a 1S in .475 Turnbull that is about the most accurate big bore rifle, of any style, that I've ever seen.
Last edited by tex_n_cal; 11/25/14. Reason: add last para
I have bought (4) Ruger #1s, all of them thinking I would rebarrel them.
All were too accurate to rebarrel.
I got this #1V 223 made in 1999 used of an on line auction in 2007 for $500. I was full of Copper fouling. I cleaned it out and sighted it in with mixed brass handloads 15 gr Blue Dot 35 gr Vmax.
It shot real well at 100 yards.
I give up. None can be rebarreled. They all shoot too well.
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. -Ernest Hemingway The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything.-- Edward John Phelps
I have 3 light barrels. They're fine (less than 1.5") until the barrel heats up. If I allow the barrel to cool completely between shots, 5-shot 1.5" or less groups are the norm. Definitely not a target rifle, but for the first 3 shots, it's OK. Bob
Have owned 3. The first shot excellent patterns with all loads. New barrel fixed that. 7x57
The other two were consistently in the .7-.8 range at 100 yards with a variety of loads though the .257 flat refused to shoot anything longer than a 85 gr. BT. (.22 Hornet/.257 Roberts.) Both required the fore end hanger mod and trigger work to get there. The Hornet was so boring I put 21-22 shots into .77" one morning. Bob put 9 in a 1.5" group one day. Offhand. Then I shot the last round and made it just over 3". Lucky me.
A #3 in .22 Hornet with new wood would shoot any load, any bullet into .7", any day of the week.
They are good guns, probably better with more recent production. I do wish Ruger would put proper twists in their barrels.
I am..........disturbed.
Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass. -Twain
Would I be thought a smart aleck if I just said "Accurate enough"?
Seriously, the 1A is a bit over 1", the 1V will do 3/4" when I'm on my game and the No. 3 is finicky but capable of 1".
I think I'm a bigger detriment to the groups than the rifles.
'Four legs good, two legs baaaad." ---------------------------------------------- "Jimmy, some of it's magic, Some of it's tragic, But I had a good life all the way." (Jimmy Buffett)
The scope is a VX-3 1.5-5x20. Rings are Ruger offset, 1" medium height - which is pretty much what I prefer on #1's, unless I have a long enough scope to use standard rings.
And most important, gloss finish to match the rifle
This is the .270 Liberty, which I mentioned in another thread.
Last weekend I was just double checking zero with it, and at 50 yards it put 3 into one hole. And I mean one hole; with the 3.5-10 scope at 10x, the group looked like one bullet hole.
IIRC, Mule Deer had a 1V in .22 Hornet that was superbly accurate. Ruger might have been onto something there!
I'm with SOTG. I didn't buy No.1's for BR.....
As long as they were minute of animal I was happy. I was actually pleasantly surprised at the accuracy of mine, especially without any tinkering. One of these days I got to get me a nicely figured RSI in 757. Been on my bucket list for awhile...
It ain't what you don't know that makes you an idiot...it's what you know for certain, that just ain't so...
Most people don't want to believe the truth~they want the truth to be what they believe.
I'd been shooting #1S 218 Bee when a friend told me about this custom #3 he saw at the LGS on the used rack. He's a lefty and the single shot interested him but he pondered on it too long (I was afraid it was going to get away ). Out of guilt for buying it out from under him, I sold him my 218 Bee.
How much brass you need to get it running? I might be able to help - I came into 800 pieces of once fired when I had the Bee. My friend got most of it with the rifle but I kept a bag of loaded rounds intending to pull bullets and give him the rest of the brass which never happened. Initially, I had some issues getting the K-Hornet shooting and was considering going back to the Bee with it so decided to hang on to the brass. I'm pretty sure I still have it packed away somewhere, but not sure how much (want to say at least 50)...
I've been tempted a couple times to try and get the Bee back - he doesn't shoot it and I have a #1A 7x57 he wants. I probably could work a trade and end up with a large bucket of brass. Dang - now the wheels are turning...
Just dug them out and have a bit more than I remembered. PM an address and I'll gift you 50 (Campfire goodwill and all ). That will leave me some to maybe play with a Bee again someday. This now has me envisioning a tapered octagon 218 Bee barrel on my #1A...
I have a #1-B SS Lam in 7mm STW, with factory ammo, Nosler 160 Accubonds, my last range trip I shot a 3 shot group of .78 inches at 200 yards. My dad has a #1-B Sporter in 243, he can take a ten shot group of factory Remington 90 grain Scirrocos at 100 yards and cover it with a nickle. Just a matter of finding what load each rifle likes.
Nice - I think I'd really enjoy one in 405. I did pick one up in 450/400 NE but haven't worked with it much, other than reduced loads and cast bullets.
Even the 405 comes back with full house #1 style loads. I was getting 2450 to 2500 ft/sec with a 300 grain bullet, which is about 200 to 250 ft/sec over factory.
I imagine the 450/400 would do likewise.
"Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life." (Prov 4:23)
Agreed - with similar weight bullets, I wouldn't expect much difference between the two. I do have a 405, but in a Win 1895 (repro) that is easily my favorite lever action.
My is early 80's vintage 1B in .280 Rem. Right out of the box it was giving pretty much full-choke patterns at 100 yards. After bedding the area where the forearm screw goes in, tinkering with screw tightness, and messing with seating depth it is now shooting 1-1.25 3 shot groups with 140 Sierra GK and 175 Speer GS.
A mid 1970s production #1V in .22-250 with a very long throat shoots consistent 5/8inch five shot groups. My #3 in .223 shot 3/4 inch five shot groups. I have since sold the #3.
I like the looks of that rifle with the front sight removed. Did you just remove the sight, or did you shorten the barrel to remove the sight?
I like the idea of having sights as backup in the event of scope failure, but they can be a PITA. They catch in the lining of a soft case, and they stick up into the FOV of the scope. Actually, scope failures are rare, and it would take time to remove a scope in the field and require a screwdriver. So maybe I'll have the sight removed from my #1A 7x57. Only problem is it would decrease the value should I decide to resell.
Another thing I dislike about the #1 is the screwey quarter rib. The thing weighs a ton and makes the scope sit higher than necessary (I like them low). But you can't just take of the quarter rib because it leaves unsightly threaded holes in the barrel exposed, not to mention those ugly pins that hold the rib in place.
I have this idea to replace the quarter rib with a mount of my own design. The mount would use the existing threaded holes and pins in the barrel, but it would be very low profile in the front thus allowing a scope to be mounted lower without the object bell hitting the rib. I would contour it the same as the barrel so it lays flush with the barrel. It would stay low profile from front to back except it would be raised in two spots where the Talley vertical split scope rings attach. Both rings would be positioned about 3/4" to the rear of where the existing Ruger rings attach to the quarter rib. The rear ring would sit directly above the receiver ring. This would allow the scope to be mounted about 3/4" farther back than it is now in the standard rings. This new base would be machined from aluminum to conserve weight, anodized gloss black of course to match the blued barrel and receiver.
Another thing I want to modify is the safety slide. I dislike the stock unit that blocks cartridges from ejecting clear of the rifle, and looks crappy the way it gaps up from the receiver and moves around freely. I really like the safety mod that is dome by Hamilton Bowen, but I'm not sure i would go quite that far. Maybe just shortening the front extension to allow cartridges to eject free of the rifle would be sufficient.
Sorry to ramble.
Our God reigns. Harrumph!!! I often use quick reply. My posts are not directed toward any specific person unless I mention them by name.
It's a re-barreled 1A with a 24" Shilen chrome moly 1:9 chambered in 257 Roberts with a 1B quarter rib; made myself an AH. Weighs 7-11 with a VXII 2-7 in Burris low rings.
Black pad is later vintage. Not sure when they started making better barrels. My K1A in 6.5x55 will put the first two shots into the same hole at 100 yards. The third shot will be about an inch away.
I have several, and have no complaints about accuracy. I truly believe they pretty much shoot as well as my bolt guns. But then I'm not shooting them a half mile either.
There is no accounting for taste.
Experience is a great thing as long as one survives it.
Generally, there ain't a lot that separates the two however, Barely making it is a whole lot more satisfying than barely not making it.
My R#1A in 7x57 consistently shoots three 150s at 1/2" to 3/4" at 100 yds.
I -relieved the wood at the rear of the fore arm to not touch the action. -Put some bedding in the front of the fore arm. -Put a hard plastic shim snug between the barrel and the hanger.
Holds poi without shift over time and weather variations.
Did same with R#3 in 223 and same results.
jmho Tim
"The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them." Albert Einstein
At Khe Sanh a sign read "For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected never knew".
1/2 MOA at 200 yards. This group is cherry picked, but it is consistently 1 MOA for three shots. Starts to walk vertically until you let the barrel cool after that. Definitely an accurate rifle for hunting. Not for shooting strings of 10.