|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 14,653
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 14,653 |
You've gotta be hardcore to get a free pair of pants. To wear at work.
your flippant remarks which you so adeptly sling
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120
Campfire Member
|
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120 |
My argument for the Ruger LCR 9mm above all others:
1) The LCR gives you five 9mm rounds without any appreciable energy loss for a short 1-7/8" barrel. I believe 38 spec is the bare minimum power factor to reliably stop an attacker who might be wearing a winter coat or a leather jacket. 9mm and 9mm +P is even better.
2) The LCR gives me two major advantages that larger handguns can't. I can grab it and conceal it very easily every time I get out of the car AND I can draw it from concealment even witha criminal standing right in front of me. Because I can carry it in my front right pants pocket in a pocket holster. You'd never know it's there.
If I'm running errands and stop at a gas station, sliding the LCR Into my front pants pocket is no harder than putting my cell phone in my pocket. If I had my Sig P228 or my 1911 commander in an IWB rig, I'd have to spend several minutes trying to shoehorn it on. I could put the IWB rig on before I leave home, but that causes a few problems. It's not real comfortable to drive with a seatbelt on and a CCW jabbing into my side. Also, I can't legally carry at my workplace. Most Americans can't either, because most employers have a private policy barring firearms from the premises. Lastly, in summer time, wearing shorts and t-shirts, concealing a larger gun is harder.
The Ruger LCR solves all those problems for me. Plus, any time I find myself in a situation where attackers have gotten the jump on me, I can say "hey, you can have my wallet" as I draw the LCR out. Criminals always want money. I doubt a criminal is ever going to say no to my offer of money, wallet, car keys, etc. And I'm not going to ask either. All I need is the 1 second delay while I reach and draw the gun out. You can't do that while reaching for your hip.
The 9mm moon clips actually make loading 5 rounds as easy as loading a 1911 mag. You thumb 5 cartridges on it and drop it right into the cylinder. You can shoot the LCR without a moon clip, but will need to poke the empty cases out. Carrying a spare clip of 5 rounds is simple with the moon clip too.
Lastly, the Ruger's trigger is the best DA trigger I've tried for any revolver under $1000. With a little practice I have learned to shoot tight quick groups of 9mm. My buddies J-frame S&W 642,not so much. Long, heavy trigger pull that makes accuracy very difficult. The small semi-autos can't honestly say they will work reliably 100% of the time. They all have issues with various ammo. On e the recoil spring gets old, they start having problems.
My LCR can go in and out of a pocket every day, and deliver five 9mm rounds with accuracy, from deep concealment with ease. It is a joy to carry, so I never think to myself, "I'll just run in to grab a soda, so I'll just leave my gun in the car".
I think the next best argument to an LCR 9mm is an LCR in 38 special. I've carried a dozen handguns, shot 50 others. I haven't found anything that works better for every day carry, for giving me an ace up my sleeve no matter how dire the situation is and for being a very well made handgun that is a joy to shoot.
this is 1980's thinking grab a S&W shield or better yet a glock 26. I can't hit the broadside of a barn with one of those dinky revolvers. however head shots with a glock 26 at in excess of 15 yards is no problemo. I have no problem putting all 5 in the head at 15 with either of my LCR's. Not sure what the 1980 comment means. LCR is an Accurate, potent, reliable gun that is more easily carried than most.
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!”
-Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120
Campfire Member
|
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120 |
What can a 9mm do that a .38spl +P can't do just as well or better? The LCR can shoot 9mm +P also. So it delivers about 50% more energy and penetration than 38 +P. Not really true. While .38+P pressures are considerably lower, case volume is higher and when using appropriate powders there is very little difference in velocity for a given weight bullet. For example, SAAMI +P pressures are 38.5Kpsi for the 9mm Luger but only 20Kpsi for the .38Spl +P. SAAMI references 1235fps for a 115g in the 9mm Luger +P and 1150fps for a 130g in the .38 Spl +P. Hodgdon lists .38 Spl +P loads of 110g/1337fps/17.7Kpsi and 125g/1228fps/18.3Kpsi. The higher pressure of the 9mm +P loads will increase wear and tear on the revolver but you really don't get much in return in terms of downrange performance - if anything. Not saying you shouldn't use the 9mm or that it doesn't make sense in some applications - particualrly if you have other 9mm Lugers and want to have common ammo. But for most people most of the time the .38 version is a better choice. I based my comment on the +P ammo that can be purchased. If you can hand load 38 to higher pressures and achieve performance to 9mm +P, then great. Here's a comparison of commonly available ammo: http://www.ballistics101.com/9mm_vs_.38special.php
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!”
-Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,683
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,683 |
Hard to keep me from leaving my Kahr CW9. Damn near impossible actually.
Conduct is the best proof of character.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651 |
If it is power and penetration one wants, one could - and should - just say �Screw both the .38 Spl +P and 9mm Luger and give me a LCR chambered for .357 Mag�. No way the 9mm is going to keep up. The highest energy 9mm +P load listed on the link you provided ( http://www.ballistics101.com/9mm_vs_.38special.php) is a Double Tap load pushing a 124g to 1310 fps and 473 fpe. While that is a potent 9mm load, it is a weak sister to Buffalo Bore�s .38 Spl +P load that pushes a 158g hardcast Keith bullet to 1250fps and 588 fpe (Buffalo Bore SKU 20H/20). That is 24% more energy than the Double Tap 9mm +P load can deliver and the hardcast Keith bullet will penetrate much further than the HP in the Double Tap 9mm +P load. Too bad the Buffalo Bore .38 Spl +P ammo is available everywhere except Kingwood, TX. [Edited to add�] One should also not that in the link you provided, the author does not state what barrel lengths are used for the 9mm and .38 velocities. The Federal and Fiocchi web sites do not state barrel length, either. In the case of Double Tap ammo, the 9mm +P barrel was from a 4� barrel while the .38 Spl +P velocity was from a 1.875� barrel. Cor-Bon also uses 4� and 1.875� barrels for their tests. Buffalo Bore uses 9mm barrels of 4� and up and a variety .38 Spl +P barrel s from 2� and up. Buffalo Bore�s data thus allows one to make more direct comparisons than is possible with the other products mentioned in the link and the comparison is telling � at equal barrel lengths the .38 Spl +P can equal or exceed the 9mm +P. If more is better, get a .357 Mag.
Last edited by Coyote_Hunter; 12/16/14.
Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!
No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.
A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
I used to think the same but now there are so many people wearing cargo pants and shorts I don't think most drugged up scumbags notice...
Bob
Nothing says cop like 5.11 and a purposely unkept goatee/beard. They're fun to watch though. Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
I understand, living in such dangerous territory as you do.
What an incredible tactical mindset you have. Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
I can't hit the broadside of a barn with one of those dinky revolvers.
That says a lot. Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,519
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,519 |
Can't speak to the LCR other than to say it's an OK snubnose, albeit the ugliest damn one I've seen in ages. I can tell you that the short SP101 easily breaks 1300 fps with 125 grain Magnum JHPs and it ain't bad to shoot with them.
The 9mm isn't a bad round but here are too many good pocket autos around, to fool with it in a revolver.
Direct Impingement is the Fart Joke of military rifle operating systems. ⓒ
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
Try one for daily carry and then shoot it next to a comparable sized auto at the range.
Let me know what you think.
Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
250 3000,
Have you tried putting a NS on either of your LCR's?
Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,860
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13,860 |
Try one for daily carry and then shoot it next to a comparable sized auto at the range.
I shoot an LCR and a Khar PM9 equally well. The LCR is faster to draw because it has a better "handle". This facilitates better close-range point shooting.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
Try one for daily carry and then shoot it next to a comparable sized auto at the range.
I shoot an LCR and a Khar PM9 equally well. The LCR is faster to draw because it has a better "handle". This facilitates better close-range point shooting. I was trying to keep the conversation within the confines of reality. But thanks for sharing what you can do with your pretend guns. Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,403
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,403 |
I don't often have to worry about two legged varmints. I carry a model 19 4" or a Model 15 4" in holsters on the hip mostly, when hiking in the woods. But I bought a Model 19 snub nose for visiting St Petersburg where it seemed to me two legged varmints abound.
I have a 9mm semi and a 45 auto but I prefer the revolvers for
1. bullet selection
2. Cases don't fly all over
3. Load from light to hot - no function problems
The LCR 9mm would not have the flying case issue, granted.
But if I had to travel to places where two legged varmints frequent, the LCR in 38 or 357 would be my choice and would probably be better than the Model 19 that I own because it is not so bulky or heavy(I really like my 19's though). Semi-autos have one advantage - flat sides. Revolvers have more advantages in my opinion. The LCR seems to me a good solution to the two legged varmint issue. If you prefer the 9mm sounds OK to me.
BTW, I rarely shoot factory ammo so that would be one reason my view would be different than yours.
I prefer classic.
Semper Fi
I used to run with the hare. Now I'm envious of the tortoise and I do my own stunts but rarely intentionally
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369 |
Smith and Wesson M642 + Crimson Trace laser grips + Speer Gold Dot 135 grain +P 38 Special is my solution. Haven't found anything that exceeds it in power + convenience in a package I will actually carry. If you need more than five rounds, carry another M642... which solves the "celerity of reload" problem...
have no experience with the Ruger revolvers...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,519
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,519 |
I used to think the same but now there are so many people wearing cargo pants and shorts I don't think most drugged up scumbags notice...
Bob
Nothing says cop like 5.11 and a purposely unkept goatee/beard. They're fun to watch though. Travis ROFL
Direct Impingement is the Fart Joke of military rifle operating systems. ⓒ
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 323
Campfire Member
|
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 323 |
What can a 9mm do that a .38spl +P can't do just as well or better? My thoughts exactly. I own autos and revolvers, but would 10x rather carry a revolver. But a 9mm revolver makes absolutely no sense to me. The 9mm vs. 38 Spec. ammo comparisons always compare light bullets and their higher velocity from the 9mm. What they DON'T show you is how a .38 Special shines with bullets from 150 gr. and up. A few 38 Spec +P (20,000 psi)loads from Handloader #276 (fired from a Ruger LCR, no less): 140 gr. Speer JHP; 6.6 grs. Longshot- 932 fps 158 gr. RimRock SWCHP; 6.3 grs. Power Pistol- 1004 fps 173 gr. Cast SWC; 6.0 grs. Longshot- 913 fps 173 gr. Cast SWC; 7.0 grs. AA#5- 927 fps 173 gr. Cast SWC; 5.9 grs. Power Pistol- 946 fps Additionally, if the LCR can withstand the pressures generated by the 9mm cartridge, then it can with stand similar pressure from a .38 Special, so loads even heavier than these would be possible, if desired.
"Only accurate rifles are interesting."- Col. Townsend Whelen
"I always tell the truth....that way, I don't have to remember anything."- George Burns
NRA Life Member
Certified NRA Reloading Instructor
Certified Texas Hunter Education Instructor
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120
Campfire Member
|
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120 |
250 3000,
Have you tried putting a NS on either of your LCR's?
Travis Yes, I have an XS STANDARD DOT sight on my 38 and have ordered one for my 9mm also. I like them a lot.
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!”
-Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120
Campfire Member
|
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120 |
What can a 9mm do that a .38spl +P can't do just as well or better? My thoughts exactly. I own autos and revolvers, but would 10x rather carry a revolver. But a 9mm revolver makes absolutely no sense to me. The 9mm vs. 38 Spec. ammo comparisons always compare light bullets and their higher velocity from the 9mm. What they DON'T show you is how a .38 Special shines with bullets from 150 gr. and up. A few 38 Spec +P (20,000 psi)loads from Handloader #276 (fired from a Ruger LCR, no less): 140 gr. Speer JHP; 6.6 grs. Longshot- 932 fps 158 gr. RimRock SWCHP; 6.3 grs. Power Pistol- 1004 fps 173 gr. Cast SWC; 6.0 grs. Longshot- 913 fps 173 gr. Cast SWC; 7.0 grs. AA#5- 927 fps 173 gr. Cast SWC; 5.9 grs. Power Pistol- 946 fps Additionally, if the LCR can withstand the pressures generated by the 9mm cartridge, then it can with stand similar pressure from a .38 Special, so loads even heavier than these would be possible, if desired. Ok, so I've learned now, there are companies who load the 38 to higher pressures and it can meet 9mm +P energy. I don't think I'd shoot those near 357 - 38 special loads in the lighter framed LCR 38 special. So I'd either buy the 357 model or the 9mm model. I chose the 9mm model and prefer it over the 357 for a few reasons. 1). 9mm ammo is cheaper and can be shared with several of my 9mm semi-autos. 2). I like the moon clips more than 38 speed loaders. Less bulky, quicker loading for me. 3). With a short nose, lightweight handgun, I believe there is a balance to be struck between power and recoil. With the 9mm, I have found my balance and I can shoot the dickens out of it. I could find that same balance using the 357 LCR, and it would likely be somewhere below standard 357 loads and above standard 38 loads. But the 9mm already does it for me perfectly, Note: on Buffalo Bores website, for their 38 +P Outdoorsman load, they say, "In the super lightweight alloy revolvers (around 11-12 oz.) the bullet will not jump crimp under recoil provided you do not subject an unfired round to more than 5 or 6 firings." I'd stick with the stouter 9mm or 357 LCR frames for the heavier loads. I hand load all my rifle ammo, but not so much for handguns. Thanks for providing some insight to what your hand loads can do. It has got me thinking about getting a mold and casting some bullets too.
Last edited by 250_3000; 12/17/14.
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!”
-Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 323
Campfire Member
|
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 323 |
Hey, as long as you're happy with your choice that's all that matters.
"Only accurate rifles are interesting."- Col. Townsend Whelen
"I always tell the truth....that way, I don't have to remember anything."- George Burns
NRA Life Member
Certified NRA Reloading Instructor
Certified Texas Hunter Education Instructor
|
|
|
|
|
571 members (1beaver_shooter, 10gaugemag, 1234, 19rabbit52, 12344mag, 1_deuce, 51 invisible),
2,035
guests, and
1,118
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,087
Posts18,463,935
Members73,923
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
