|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 22,690
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 22,690 |
I never scoped any of the .416s I had (or the .470) -- the largest I've scoped has been a .375.
FWIW, that rifle has about 700 rds through it with the original scope (a straight tube VX-II 1x4x20)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 189
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 189 |
I never scoped any of the .416s I had (or the .470) -- the largest I've scoped has been a .375.
FWIW, that rifle has about 700 rds through it with the original scope (a straight tube VX-II 1x4x20) I have one of those scopes as well. It spent many years on a M700 Classic in .35 Whelen. Never a problem. Sitting on the shelf now that the Whelen has a new Leupold 3x.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453 |
If you can shoot a barrel out from under a scope without it losing zero, then that's a "tough" scope. Never thought of it that way and it's probably very true.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453 |
I never scoped any of the .416s I had (or the .470) -- the largest I've scoped has been a .375.
FWIW, that rifle has about 700 rds through it with the original scope (a straight tube VX-II 1x4x20) Shooting those rounds, I'm more concerned about a dislocated shoulder or detached retina than breaking a scope.
|
|
|
|
716 members (1beaver_shooter, 160user, 1936M71, 007FJ, 01Foreman400, 163dm, 70 invisible),
3,101
guests, and
1,284
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,583
Posts18,454,227
Members73,908
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|