Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire This fellow has.....

Not to hard to figure things like these out.
Just follow the money.
Plain and simple

"Now which is easier to believe. 15,000 scientists across the world in on a big scam."

Since you have asked the question twice, I think you deserve an answer:

Of course they are. Follow the money. If I had enough money, do you think I would have any trouble finding scientists to do research to "prove" a 270 Win. is superior to a 270 WBY.?

I have always been amazed at the large # of folks that are so willing to sell their souls to make a buck, mind boggling to say the least.

Wouldn't that be "us"??

I guess you missed my other posts. I think we're already doing a lot to address the issue. My once a month BBQ isn't the problem, I'll guarantee you that.

No. Because that would imply "everybody" or an all inclusive reduction in modern day living for the sake of the greater good.




Travis

Again, that's like saying the cardiologist has to be wrong about your diagnosis because he stands to make money treating you.

The scientists happen to be on the government tit because that's the kind of research they do; government kind. So because of that, you'll just ignore ANYTHING they come up with?

Okay so what about this guy. He's not on the government tit, and he was paid by guys who specifically wanted him to come down on the side of the deniers. What's his motivation. If you follow the money, he should have come down with something completely different.

http://disinfo.com/2012/07/koch-bro...ong-global-warming-is-real-and-man-made/


And follow the money with the oil companies...they all stand to lose from climate change, yet not one of them take the stance that climate change isn't real or man made.

We're saying the same thing, you're just arguing semantics. But we're still on the same page. They want us in caves, they want to live in their massive mansions and be the ruling elite.

No, there are not. There are well over 15,000 who say we CONTRIBUTE to it.

Big difference. Especially when you consider that around 10k years ago my cabin was under a thick sheet of ice......one that melted without any help from the human race.

Eventually our sun will expand and engulf the rock we live on in flames. Just something to think about.

(I am not saying we shouldn't be prudent and good stewards of our resources, jut pointing out that it may not be an awesome idea to destroy economies trying to fight something that we barely have any impact on)

No we're not.





Travis

I need you to explain how the oil companies stand to lose money from "climate change"? It's almost as naive as the belief, by morons, that when the government "sticks it to big business" through astronomical tax rates, that it is not the consumers that pay all of that tax through an increase in product cost.

Was a time all the scientists believed the earth flat.

The fact Greenland used to be green proves to me the earth was warmer before there were cars.

So you don't think the carbon credit scheme of Kyoto isn't costing oil companies money?

Unless the sun burns out and then it will get colder than a well diggers a__ on this old rock.

This discussion would be a hell of a lot better reading if you guys would stop quoting gungeek.

I hate it when that happens.

Kevin, when your lying govt is telling you carbon dioxide is poisonous then i take everything they say with a gos. I guess you can say water is poison too if you drink too much too quick.

Here is a tip you. A person can dislike Obama and his policies and still question those whose stances oppose him.

A Pole in 1939 may have cheered the Russians.....for a while.

I put Gibson on ignore yesterday. I will toggle his posts down in the shooting/ reloading forums as he seems quite knowledgeable in those areas, but I've read enough of his crap up here. If I want to read some socialis democrat propaganda I'll go over to DU.