|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,680
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,680 |
a very distinct method of 'cutting through all the BS!!
Ian Rutherford Plimer is an Australian geologist, professor emeritus of earth sciences at the University of Melbourne, professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide , and the director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies. He has published 130 scientific papers, six books and edited the Encyclopaedia of Geology.
Born
12 February 1946 (age 67)
Residence
Australia
Nationality
Australian
Fields
Earth Science, Geology, Mining Engineering
Institutions
University of New England , University of Newcastle , University of Melbourne ,University of Adelaide
Alma mater
University of New South Wales, Macquarie University
Thesis
The pipe deposits of tungsten-molybdenum-bismuth in eastern Australia (1976)
Notable awards
Eureka Prize (1995, 2002),Centenary Medal(2003), Clarke Medal (2004)
Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From?
Professor Ian Plimer could not have said it better!
If you've read his book you will agree, this is a good summary.
PLIMER: "Okay, here's the bombshell. The volcanic eruption in Iceland . Since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet - all of you.
Of course, you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress - it;s that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans and all animal life.
I know....it's very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your kids "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of
your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, vacationing at home instead of abroad,
Nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50 cent light bulbs with $10.00 light bulbs.....well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just four days.
The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in just four days - yes, FOUR DAYS - by that volcano in Iceland has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon. And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud at any one time - EVERY DAY.
I don't really want to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention that when the volcano Mt Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its years on earth.
Yes, folks, Mt Pinatubo was active for over
One year - think about it.
Of course, I shouldn't spoil this 'touchy-feely tree-hugging' moment and mention the effect of solar and cosmic activity and the well-recognized 800-year global heating and cooling cycle, which
keeps happening despite our completely insignificant efforts to affect climate change.
And I do wish I had a silver lining to this volcanic ash cloud, but the fact of the matter is that the bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.
Just remember that your government just tried to impose a whopping carbon tax on you, on the basis of the bogus 'human-caused' climate-change scenario.
Hey, isn't it interesting how they don't mention 'Global Warming' anymore, just 'Climate Change' - you know why?
It's because the planet has COOLED by 0.7 degrees in the past century and these global warming bull artists got caught with their pants down.
And, just keep in mind that you might yet have an Emissions Trading Scheme - that whopping new tax - imposed on you that will achieve absolutely nothing except make you poorer.
It won't stop any volcanoes from erupting, that's for sure. But, hey, relax......give the world a hug and have a nice day!"
Even birds know not to land downwind!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,249
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,249 |
_______________________________________________________
An 8 dollar driveway boy living in a T-111 shack
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,913
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,913 |
I am making an effort not to let politics choose my science on this one. Here is an opposing view for any interested in making a rational comparison based on full weight of evidence presented by both sides of the case. http://www.climatechange.gov.au/sites/climatechange/files/documents/03_2013/prof-plimer-answers.pdf Just to be clear, I have already stated I am fully aware of governmental ulterior motives regarding this. I have no interest in promoting that. I merely want to know the truth. Real truth as the fate of the world we give our children is involved.
When a country is well governed, poverty and a mean condition are something to be ashamed of. When a country is ill governed, riches and honors are something to be ashamed of
. Confucius
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,055
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,055 |
I am making an effort not to let politics choose my science on this one. Here is an opposing view for any interested in making a rational comparison based on full weight of evidence presented by both sides of the case. http://www.climatechange.gov.au/sites/climatechange/files/documents/03_2013/prof-plimer-answers.pdf Just to be clear, I have already stated I am fully aware of governmental ulterior motives regarding this. I have no interest in promoting that. I merely want to know the truth. Real truth as the fate of the world we give our children is involved. Pick an article, on the page provided below. They all expose how the so-called scientific data has been FUDGED by Australia, Europe, the UN, and NASA to fit the global warming agenda to procure funding to line their pockets. http://www.google.com/webhp?client=...ists+caught+misleading+on+global+warming
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
Did they start that right after they faked the moon landings? There are well over 15,000 scientists across the world who are onboard with climate change being man made. Are you telling me that all 15,000 are in on the conspiracy?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
a very distinct method of 'cutting through all the BS!!
Ian Rutherford Plimer is an Australian geologist, professor emeritus of earth sciences at the University of Melbourne, professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide , and the director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies. He has published 130 scientific papers, six books and edited the Encyclopaedia of Geology.
Born
12 February 1946 (age 67)
Residence
Australia
Nationality
Australian
Fields
Earth Science, Geology, Mining Engineering
Institutions
University of New England , University of Newcastle , University of Melbourne ,University of Adelaide
Alma mater
University of New South Wales, Macquarie University
Thesis
The pipe deposits of tungsten-molybdenum-bismuth in eastern Australia (1976)
Notable awards
Eureka Prize (1995, 2002),Centenary Medal(2003), Clarke Medal (2004)
Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From?
Professor Ian Plimer could not have said it better!
If you've read his book you will agree, this is a good summary.
PLIMER: "Okay, here's the bombshell. The volcanic eruption in Iceland . Since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet - all of you.
Of course, you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress - it;s that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans and all animal life.
I know....it's very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your kids "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of
your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, vacationing at home instead of abroad,
Nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50 cent light bulbs with $10.00 light bulbs.....well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just four days.
The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in just four days - yes, FOUR DAYS - by that volcano in Iceland has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon. And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud at any one time - EVERY DAY.
I don't really want to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention that when the volcano Mt Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its years on earth.
Yes, folks, Mt Pinatubo was active for over
One year - think about it.
Of course, I shouldn't spoil this 'touchy-feely tree-hugging' moment and mention the effect of solar and cosmic activity and the well-recognized 800-year global heating and cooling cycle, which
keeps happening despite our completely insignificant efforts to affect climate change.
And I do wish I had a silver lining to this volcanic ash cloud, but the fact of the matter is that the bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.
Just remember that your government just tried to impose a whopping carbon tax on you, on the basis of the bogus 'human-caused' climate-change scenario.
Hey, isn't it interesting how they don't mention 'Global Warming' anymore, just 'Climate Change' - you know why?
It's because the planet has COOLED by 0.7 degrees in the past century and these global warming bull artists got caught with their pants down.
And, just keep in mind that you might yet have an Emissions Trading Scheme - that whopping new tax - imposed on you that will achieve absolutely nothing except make you poorer.
It won't stop any volcanoes from erupting, that's for sure. But, hey, relax......give the world a hug and have a nice day!" If you really buy off on this, then you really haven't thought things through. Yeah what he says is probably true. But if there wasn't the man made carbon in the atmosphere, then the volcanoes would have far less effect, if any at all. This article is directly pointed at someone who already has his mind made up, and not really interested in science, but something to confirm his pre-conceived notions.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453 |
Did they start that right after they faked the moon landings? There are well over 15,000 scientists across the world who are onboard with climate change being man made. Are you telling me that all 15,000 are in on the conspiracy? Show me a research scientist that doesn't go for funding and produce results to generate additional funding, and I'll show you an unemployed academic.
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474 |
a very distinct method of 'cutting through all the BS!!
Ian Rutherford Plimer is an Australian geologist, professor emeritus of earth sciences at the University of Melbourne, professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide , and the director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies. He has published 130 scientific papers, six books and edited the Encyclopaedia of Geology.
Born
12 February 1946 (age 67)
Residence
Australia
Nationality
Australian
Fields
Earth Science, Geology, Mining Engineering
Institutions
University of New England , University of Newcastle , University of Melbourne ,University of Adelaide
Alma mater
University of New South Wales, Macquarie University
Thesis
The pipe deposits of tungsten-molybdenum-bismuth in eastern Australia (1976)
Notable awards
Eureka Prize (1995, 2002),Centenary Medal(2003), Clarke Medal (2004)
Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From?
Professor Ian Plimer could not have said it better!
If you've read his book you will agree, this is a good summary.
PLIMER: "Okay, here's the bombshell. The volcanic eruption in Iceland . Since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet - all of you.
Of course, you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress - it;s that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans and all animal life.
I know....it's very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your kids "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of
your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, vacationing at home instead of abroad,
Nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50 cent light bulbs with $10.00 light bulbs.....well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just four days.
The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in just four days - yes, FOUR DAYS - by that volcano in Iceland has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon. And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud at any one time - EVERY DAY.
I don't really want to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention that when the volcano Mt Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its years on earth.
Yes, folks, Mt Pinatubo was active for over
One year - think about it.
Of course, I shouldn't spoil this 'touchy-feely tree-hugging' moment and mention the effect of solar and cosmic activity and the well-recognized 800-year global heating and cooling cycle, which
keeps happening despite our completely insignificant efforts to affect climate change.
And I do wish I had a silver lining to this volcanic ash cloud, but the fact of the matter is that the bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.
Just remember that your government just tried to impose a whopping carbon tax on you, on the basis of the bogus 'human-caused' climate-change scenario.
Hey, isn't it interesting how they don't mention 'Global Warming' anymore, just 'Climate Change' - you know why?
It's because the planet has COOLED by 0.7 degrees in the past century and these global warming bull artists got caught with their pants down.
And, just keep in mind that you might yet have an Emissions Trading Scheme - that whopping new tax - imposed on you that will achieve absolutely nothing except make you poorer.
It won't stop any volcanoes from erupting, that's for sure. But, hey, relax......give the world a hug and have a nice day!" If you really buy off on this, then you really haven't thought things through. Yeah what he says is probably true. But if there wasn't the man made carbon in the atmosphere, then the volcanoes would have far less effect, if any at all. This article is directly pointed at someone who already has his mind made up, and not really interested in science, but something to confirm his pre-conceived notions. Sure there is man made stuff in the air. But we've had climate change long before man was in the industrial age and could even start to contribute tiny amounts to an overall total. We are not big and bad enough to do what we are consistently accused of doing.
We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453 |
a very distinct method of 'cutting through all the BS!!
Ian Rutherford Plimer is an Australian geologist, professor emeritus of earth sciences at the University of Melbourne, professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide , and the director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies. He has published 130 scientific papers, six books and edited the Encyclopaedia of Geology.
Born
12 February 1946 (age 67)
Residence
Australia
Nationality
Australian
Fields
Earth Science, Geology, Mining Engineering
Institutions
University of New England , University of Newcastle , University of Melbourne ,University of Adelaide
Alma mater
University of New South Wales, Macquarie University
Thesis
The pipe deposits of tungsten-molybdenum-bismuth in eastern Australia (1976)
Notable awards
Eureka Prize (1995, 2002),Centenary Medal(2003), Clarke Medal (2004)
Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From?
Professor Ian Plimer could not have said it better!
If you've read his book you will agree, this is a good summary.
PLIMER: "Okay, here's the bombshell. The volcanic eruption in Iceland . Since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet - all of you.
Of course, you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress - it;s that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans and all animal life.
I know....it's very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your kids "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of
your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, vacationing at home instead of abroad,
Nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50 cent light bulbs with $10.00 light bulbs.....well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just four days.
The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in just four days - yes, FOUR DAYS - by that volcano in Iceland has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon. And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud at any one time - EVERY DAY.
I don't really want to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention that when the volcano Mt Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its years on earth.
Yes, folks, Mt Pinatubo was active for over
One year - think about it.
Of course, I shouldn't spoil this 'touchy-feely tree-hugging' moment and mention the effect of solar and cosmic activity and the well-recognized 800-year global heating and cooling cycle, which
keeps happening despite our completely insignificant efforts to affect climate change.
And I do wish I had a silver lining to this volcanic ash cloud, but the fact of the matter is that the bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.
Just remember that your government just tried to impose a whopping carbon tax on you, on the basis of the bogus 'human-caused' climate-change scenario.
Hey, isn't it interesting how they don't mention 'Global Warming' anymore, just 'Climate Change' - you know why?
It's because the planet has COOLED by 0.7 degrees in the past century and these global warming bull artists got caught with their pants down.
And, just keep in mind that you might yet have an Emissions Trading Scheme - that whopping new tax - imposed on you that will achieve absolutely nothing except make you poorer.
It won't stop any volcanoes from erupting, that's for sure. But, hey, relax......give the world a hug and have a nice day!" If you really buy off on this, then you really haven't thought things through. Yeah what he says is probably true. But if there wasn't the man made carbon in the atmosphere, then the volcanoes would have far less effect, if any at all. This article is directly pointed at someone who already has his mind made up, and not really interested in science, but something to confirm his pre-conceived notions. Sure there is man made stuff in the air. But we've had climate change long before man was in the industrial age and could even start to contribute tiny amounts to an overall total. We are not big and bad enough to do what we are consistently accused of doing. Even if we are responsible for what they claim, it ain't where they are putting the blame. Open air cookstoves in the developing and undeveloped world produce as much CO2 and "black carbon" as the entire global automobile fleet.
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 14,936
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 14,936 |
Every year when the mexicans do their big burns we get the smoke
here in Texas. They bitch about the air quality here. Go tell
it to the fin' mexicans.
Last edited by poboy; 01/27/15.
--- CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE --- A Magic Time To Be An Illegal In America---
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,680
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,680 |
Hey guys....keep track of the responses and you'll be able to tell who the 'liberal progressives' are!!
Even birds know not to land downwind!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,691
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,691 |
Even if we where causing this, which is not "decided" as Al Gore would like you to believe, how does further taxing(enslaving) people solve the issue? It's outcome based science, from what I've seen, with the sole purpose of confiscating property and controlling a huge segment of our economy. There was an article this summer that pointed out that the vast majority of all environmental groups, the ones who fund and promote the research, are anti-capitalist...that means they oppose the foundation of our country and our way of life. The damage to the world we leave our children will be far greater if we allow the government to "solve" this non-problem than if we all started heating our homes by burning old tires.
Last edited by kciH; 01/27/15.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." TJ
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing". EB
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317 |
If you really buy off on this, then you really haven't thought things through. Yeah what he says is probably true. But if there wasn't the man made carbon in the atmosphere, then the volcanoes would have far less effect, if any at all. This article is directly pointed at someone who already has his mind made up, and not really interested in science, but something to confirm his pre-conceived notions. The way I look at it, it is the height of man's hubris to say that he has no impact on the environment and hence weather. On the flip side, it is the height of man's arrogance to claim that he has even the slightest inkling as to all the factors that affect the climate and how man's actions affect the climate. There is also the greatest of ironies that without modern technology man would not have the instruments and computers to measure the climate and evaluate those measurements. As to the "purity" of science, every scientist has an agenda. His or her research is limited in scope to either fall into line with what is politically popular to gain grant or university funding, or it is limited to what a corporation deems what is evaluated to provide a commercial profit and hence to garner R&D funding.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453 |
If you really buy off on this, then you really haven't thought things through. Yeah what he says is probably true. But if there wasn't the man made carbon in the atmosphere, then the volcanoes would have far less effect, if any at all. This article is directly pointed at someone who already has his mind made up, and not really interested in science, but something to confirm his pre-conceived notions. The way I look at it, it is the height of man's hubris to say that he has no impact on the environment and hence weather. On the flip side, it is the height of man's arrogance to claim that he has even the slightest inkling as to all the factors that affect the climate and how man's actions affect the climate. There is also the greatest of ironies that without modern technology man would not have the instruments and computers to measure the climate and evaluate those measurements. As to the "purity" of science, every scientist has an agenda. His or her research is limited in scope to either fall into line with what is politically popular to gain grant or university funding, or it is limited to what a corporation deems what is evaluated to provide a commercial profit and hence to garner R&D funding. Well said.
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
Show me a research scientist that doesn't go for funding and produce results to generate additional funding, and I'll show you an unemployed academic.
Stop and think, that's what they do. That's why they're on the government tit, because they do the kind of research that private industry doesn't make money from, yet we still need it done. That line of thinking from the right is just crazy. It's like saying, I don't believe in Cardiac Artery Disease...show me a cardiologist who doesn't make his money from Cardiac Artery Disease. And you want me to believe that over 15,000 of these researchers all across the world are all "in" on the scam? Now which is easier to believe. 15,000 scientists across the world in on a big scam. Or The science (despite those who have done reprehensible things) just plain points to the conclusions they make?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
If you really buy off on this, then you really haven't thought things through. Yeah what he says is probably true. But if there wasn't the man made carbon in the atmosphere, then the volcanoes would have far less effect, if any at all. This article is directly pointed at someone who already has his mind made up, and not really interested in science, but something to confirm his pre-conceived notions. The way I look at it, it is the height of man's hubris to say that he has no impact on the environment and hence weather. On the flip side, it is the height of man's arrogance to claim that he has even the slightest inkling as to all the factors that affect the climate and how man's actions affect the climate. There is also the greatest of ironies that without modern technology man would not have the instruments and computers to measure the climate and evaluate those measurements. As to the "purity" of science, every scientist has an agenda. His or her research is limited in scope to either fall into line with what is politically popular to gain grant or university funding, or it is limited to what a corporation deems what is evaluated to provide a commercial profit and hence to garner R&D funding. Well that's a cute little arguement, but it flies in the face of the actual science. Here's what I find interesting. How people on the right are very quick to accept non climate change "science". But when it's science that points to climate change, suddenly they're all a bunch of agenda driven scam artists. That right there tells me you're not interested in science, but supporting your pre-conceived notions. I give props to the Koch brothers. When their hired gun did his study and concluded that climate change is both real and man caused, they had the ballz to accept it and move on.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
Even if we where causing this, which is not "decided" as Al Gore would like you to believe, how does further taxing(enslaving) people solve the issue? It's outcome based science, from what I've seen, with the sole purpose of confiscating property and controlling a huge segment of our economy. There was an article this summer that pointed out that the vast majority of all environmental groups, the ones who fund and promote the research, are anti-capitalist...that means they oppose the foundation of our country and our way of life. The damage to the world we leave our children will be far greater if we allow the government to "solve" this non-problem than if we all started heating our homes by burning old tires.
Understand something right here and now. Because I accept the science, does not mean I accept the politics of left!!!I believe we're already doing a very good job of managing our carbon footprint. When we can afford to do more, I think we will do more. We can do this without bankrupting America. But I don't think the left has the answers. They would all live in huge mansions while the rest of us live in caves.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
Don't they still use leaded gasoline in Iran?
Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453 |
If you really buy off on this, then you really haven't thought things through. Yeah what he says is probably true. But if there wasn't the man made carbon in the atmosphere, then the volcanoes would have far less effect, if any at all. This article is directly pointed at someone who already has his mind made up, and not really interested in science, but something to confirm his pre-conceived notions. The way I look at it, it is the height of man's hubris to say that he has no impact on the environment and hence weather. On the flip side, it is the height of man's arrogance to claim that he has even the slightest inkling as to all the factors that affect the climate and how man's actions affect the climate. There is also the greatest of ironies that without modern technology man would not have the instruments and computers to measure the climate and evaluate those measurements. As to the "purity" of science, every scientist has an agenda. His or her research is limited in scope to either fall into line with what is politically popular to gain grant or university funding, or it is limited to what a corporation deems what is evaluated to provide a commercial profit and hence to garner R&D funding. Well that's a cute little arguement, but it flies in the face of the actual science. Here's what I find interesting. How people on the right are very quick to accept non climate change "science". But when it's science that points to climate change, suddenly they're all a bunch of agenda driven scam artists. That right there tells me you're not interested in science, but supporting your pre-conceived notions. I give props to the Koch brothers. When their hired gun did his study and concluded that climate change is both real and man caused, they had the ballz to accept it and move on. If you want to talk actual science, please reference the UN's own studies that show open air cookstoves producing the same greenhouse gas issues as the combined global vehicle fleet. Also, while there's increasing regulation of vehicle emissions, nothing is being done about these cookfires. Query, too, how much methane is produced by ruminants and whether anything is being done about that - or how much methane was produced by the pre-1860 herds of bison and African plains species. In the 1970s, the science was "clear" that we were going into a new Ice Age and we'd all freeze to death. In the 1990s, it was "clear" that the temperature was going to skyrocket due to "Global Warming" and that we were all going roast. Today? It's "clear" that neither of those were accurate and we've just defaulted to "climate change", while we're constantly overlooking certain variables and discovering new ones.
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
Hey guys....keep track of the responses and you'll be able to tell who the 'liberal progressives' are!! Because I accept the science, doesn't mean I accept the politics of the left. I'm not a liberal, I'm not a conservative, and I'm not a moderate. I have very strong opinions on most issues and rarely do they align with the Democratic or Republican parties. I think both parties are equally worthless and unqualified to lead this nation. But people who are die hard republicans or democrats really feel they have to slap a label on someone. I think it's because they have a limited intellect...slap on a label, that's what they are, so now I can understand them. If you feel its important to slap a label on me, be my guest...your label will be wrong, but it's all about what makes you feel all warm and fuzzy.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
Don't they still use leaded gasoline in Iran?
Travis Well the last time I filled up there...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453 |
Don't they still use leaded gasoline in Iran?
Travis Well the last time I filled up there... If they do, that could easily explain some of the irrational, violent behaviors there. Airborne lead and associated lead poisoning dropped precipitously after it was removed from gasoline in the US, and not coincidentally the rates of violence and of several different psychological disorders that lead to irrational, violent behavior also dropped.
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
If you want to talk actual science, please reference the UN's own studies that show open air cookstoves producing the same greenhouse gas issues as the combined global vehicle fleet. Also, while there's increasing regulation of vehicle emissions, nothing is being done about these cookfires. Query, too, how much methane is produced by ruminants and whether anything is being done about that - or how much methane was produced by the pre-1860 herds of bison and African plains species.
In the 1970s, the science was "clear" that we were going into a new Ice Age and we'd all freeze to death. In the 1990s, it was "clear" that the temperature was going to skyrocket due to "Global Warming" and that we were all going roast. Today? It's "clear" that neither of those were accurate and we've just defaulted to "climate change", while we're constantly overlooking certain variables and discovering new ones. Yes, that's part of the science. And your asking me why we're not doing anything about it...again, because I believe the science doesn't mean I sign on to what the left has to say about it. As for the 1970's...sure, perhaps they're all wrong again. But the prudent thing is to err on the side of caution. The solid science is pointing to one thing right now. It's not real smart to just ignore it on the off chance it might be wrong. Again the cardiologist analogy. You have a heart condition. The doc told you to lay off of the cholesterol in 1970. But then someone did a study and said that cholesterol doesn't cause heart attacks. Finally, 20 years later we find out there's good and bad cholesterol. Meanwhile you still have this underlying heart condition. Which would be the prudent course of action? Follow what the best science has to say right now, or just ignore it all on the off chance they may be wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453 |
If you want to talk actual science, please reference the UN's own studies that show open air cookstoves producing the same greenhouse gas issues as the combined global vehicle fleet. Also, while there's increasing regulation of vehicle emissions, nothing is being done about these cookfires. Query, too, how much methane is produced by ruminants and whether anything is being done about that - or how much methane was produced by the pre-1860 herds of bison and African plains species.
In the 1970s, the science was "clear" that we were going into a new Ice Age and we'd all freeze to death. In the 1990s, it was "clear" that the temperature was going to skyrocket due to "Global Warming" and that we were all going roast. Today? It's "clear" that neither of those were accurate and we've just defaulted to "climate change", while we're constantly overlooking certain variables and discovering new ones. Yes, that's part of the science. And your asking me why we're not doing anything about it...again, because I believe the science doesn't mean I sign on to what the left has to say about it. As for the 1970's...sure, perhaps they're all wrong again. But the prudent thing is to err on the side of caution. The solid science is pointing to one thing right now. It's not real smart to just ignore it on the off chance it might be wrong. Again the cardiologist analogy. You have a heart condition. The doc told you to lay off of the cholesterol in 1970. But then someone did a study and said that cholesterol doesn't cause heart attacks. Finally, 20 years later we find out there's good and bad cholesterol. Meanwhile you still have this underlying heart condition. Which would be the prudent course of action? Follow what the best science has to say right now, or just ignore it all on the off chance they may be wrong? Look, I'm all for energy independence and getting off oil about 30-f'kin'-years ago just so we don't have to dick around with the ME. For me, the biggest missed opportunity of the last 1/2 century was Reagan NOT launch a new "space program" on energy right after the Oil Embargo and pouring everything we and the Europeans had into getting off oil so we could tell the Saudis and the Arabs to pound sand (literally). What you're saying is act cautiously and prudently. Of course. The problem is that the hardliners on both sides want none of that. The left wants to castigate everything as if the science is indisputable (which it isn't) and that oil and the West are to blame totally for everything (which they aren't). Never is a word said about China, for example, who added the equivalent of the entire US coal fleet to their inventory LAST YEAR ALONE and with zero emissions or environmental controls. The right wants to drill everything, right here and right now, and put nothing into new fuel sources or efficiency or new options for electricity, vehicles, etc. Both are stupid to a catastrophic, suicidal degree. That said, the science isn't settled, isn't proven, and the biggest factors aren't being focused on. Until those things change, no difference can be made.
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,691
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,691 |
The right wants to provide the greatest amount of energy at the least cost to the consumer and industry, so it's not drill everything right here right now, it's drill until the alternatives are viable...which they are not at this time...or they wouldn't be the alternatives.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." TJ
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing". EB
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,202
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,202 |
There is no "man made CO2"
All the CO2 on the planet was here before we arrived
It just gets moved around
One shot, one kill........ It saves a lot of ammo!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
Maybe Al Gore and all the other idiots that believe man is the cause of climate change, should mount up and tackle countries like Mexico, Iran, India, and China.
Dave
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
Don't they still use leaded gasoline in Iran?
Travis Well the last time I filled up there... I thought one of the scientists might have put it in a report that you had read. You seem to know a lot about this stuff. Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
Look, I'm all for energy independence and getting off oil about 30-f'kin'-years ago just so we don't have to dick around with the ME. For me, the biggest missed opportunity of the last 1/2 century was Reagan NOT launch a new "space program" on energy right after the Oil Embargo and pouring everything we and the Europeans had into getting off oil so we could tell the Saudis and the Arabs to pound sand (literally).
What you're saying is act cautiously and prudently. Of course. The problem is that the hardliners on both sides want none of that. The left wants to castigate everything as if the science is indisputable (which it isn't) and that oil and the West are to blame totally for everything (which they aren't). Never is a word said about China, for example, who added the equivalent of the entire US coal fleet to their inventory LAST YEAR ALONE and with zero emissions or environmental controls. The right wants to drill everything, right here and right now, and put nothing into new fuel sources or efficiency or new options for electricity, vehicles, etc. Both are stupid to a catastrophic, suicidal degree. AGREED!!! That said, the science isn't settled, isn't proven, and the biggest factors aren't being focused on. Until those things change, no difference can be made. I don't think the science is ever settled. But we have enough to go on, and neither side is making what I consider rational decisions. The left wants us in the stone ages, and the righ want to act like nothing's about; neither are rational.
Last edited by GunGeek; 01/27/15.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453 |
Look, I'm all for energy independence and getting off oil about 30-f'kin'-years ago just so we don't have to dick around with the ME. For me, the biggest missed opportunity of the last 1/2 century was Reagan NOT launch a new "space program" on energy right after the Oil Embargo and pouring everything we and the Europeans had into getting off oil so we could tell the Saudis and the Arabs to pound sand (literally).
What you're saying is act cautiously and prudently. Of course. The problem is that the hardliners on both sides want none of that. The left wants to castigate everything as if the science is indisputable (which it isn't) and that oil and the West are to blame totally for everything (which they aren't). Never is a word said about China, for example, who added the equivalent of the entire US coal fleet to their inventory LAST YEAR ALONE and with zero emissions or environmental controls. The right wants to drill everything, right here and right now, and put nothing into new fuel sources or efficiency or new options for electricity, vehicles, etc. Both are stupid to a catastrophic, suicidal degree. AGREED!!!
That said, the science isn't settled, isn't proven, and the biggest factors aren't being focused on. Until those things change, no difference can be made. I don't think the science is ever settled. But we have enough to go on, and neither side is making what I consider rational decisions. The left wants us in the stone ages, and the righ want to act like nothing's about; neither are rational. [/quote] If we have enough to go on, then we need to go on it - and that does not mean concentrating on US emissions. It means taking a look at and doing something about Mbobo's cook fire in Congo and 1B Indians burning cowschit and riding motorscooters and Wu Li's newest coal plant outside of Beijing and the utter lack of effort put to any of those issues. Address the real issues, and then you'll have something to go on. Keep concentrating on the margins and nothing gets done.
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
I don't think the science is ever settled. But we have enough to go on, and neither side is making what I consider rational decisions. The left wants us in the stone ages, and the righ want to act like nothing's about; neither are rational. The left does not want "us" in the stone age. They want people that aren't them in the stone age. Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
If we have enough to go on, then we need to go on it - and that does not mean concentrating on US emissions. It means taking a look at and doing something about Mbobo's cook fire in Congo and 1B Indians burning cowschit and riding motorscooters and Wu Li's newest coal plant outside of Beijing and the utter lack of effort put to any of those issues.
Address the real issues, and then you'll have something to go on. Keep concentrating on the margins and nothing gets done. Like I said, I don't agree with how the left addresses the issues. But we can only change the US in relation to carbon emissions so that's why they're not addressing things in the Congo. And I honestly think the US is doing a pretty good job of reducing our carbon footprint. FWIW, I don't think it's legal to fire up your charcoal grill in California anymore. Meanwhile, I BBQ with nothing but charcoal (evil little me).
Last edited by GunGeek; 01/27/15.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965 |
Did they start that right after they faked the moon landings? There are well over 15,000 scientists across the world who are onboard with climate change being man made. Are you telling me that all 15,000 are in on the conspiracy? Group-think
We may know the time Ben Carson lied, but does anyone know the time Hillary Clinton told the truth?
Immersing oneself in progressive lieberalism is no different than bathing in the sewage of Hell.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,389 |
It's all crap.
The OPs article is spot phuggin on.
Do we make a wee bit of difference? Who cares when a volcano erupts?
It's commie bs and yes I do realize how 'rudimentary' that sounds. Phugg it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 58,971
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 58,971 |
Did they start that right after they faked the moon landings? There are well over 15,000 scientists across the world who are onboard with climate change being man made. Are you telling me that all 15,000 are in on the conspiracy? Show me a research scientist that doesn't go for funding and produce results to generate additional funding, and I'll show you an unemployed academic. The falsehoods will continue as long as the liberals are on board, and one wonders how their children become liberals.......
Paul
"I'd rather see a sermon than hear a sermon".... D.A.D.
Trump Won!, Sandmann Won!, Rittenhouse Won!, Suck it Liberal Fuuktards.
molɔ̀ːn labé skýla
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 58,971
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 58,971 |
FWIW, I don't think it's legal to fire up your charcoal grill in California anymore.
Meanwhile, I BBQ with nothing but charcoal (evil little me). So you believe there is a problem but you don't want to help fix it, if you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem. You're by no means a stupid person Kevin but you sure do say some of the stupidest schit I've ever heard. Quit drinking the koolaid and I bet you'd come out of the fog.
Paul
"I'd rather see a sermon than hear a sermon".... D.A.D.
Trump Won!, Sandmann Won!, Rittenhouse Won!, Suck it Liberal Fuuktards.
molɔ̀ːn labé skýla
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,081
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,081 |
Hey guys....keep track of the responses and you'll be able to tell who the 'liberal progressives' are!! It's getting pretty obvious isn't it? I don't think he's even trying to hide it anymore. IMO he's about one click away from being in the same camp as nwa, losthiway, and sacharlie. Democrat trolls just here to spread socialist propaganda, and stir [bleep].
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,545
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,545 |
I don't buy into man-made climate change or global warming, but both sides of the issue need to let go of the ruminant methane argument. There is no net gain of greenhouse gas - the digestion of the plant will release the same amount of carbon as the decomposition of the plant. Just the time frame changes. Ultimately the ruminant and the plant are part of the same carbon cycle.
Fossil fuels are a different deal. As the argument goes, fossil fuels are sequestered and out of the carbon cycle. It's only when man brings the sequestered carbon back into the cycle do they contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.
Cooking fires can also fall under the no-net-gain scenario if the fuel used is wood, cow chips, or other carbon source currently in the carbon cycle. If coal or other sequestered fuel is used then the opposite applies.
Forgive me my nonsense, as I also forgive the nonsense of those that think they talk sense.
Robert Frost
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,041
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,041 |
Did they start that right after they faked the moon landings? There are well over 15,000 scientists across the world who are onboard with climate change being man made. Are you telling me that all 15,000 are in on the conspiracy? What a fugging idiot---even for a Democrat. Scientitic truth isn't determined by majority vote. As Einstein famously remarked when the Nazi's trotted out 30 of their best scientists to claim relativity was false (I am paraphrasing) "It only takes one to prove me wrong". Is that all you've got Geek---the claim that the majority says so? for about the past 30 years they've (the scientific community) been telling us that eggs, butter and bacon (high cholesterol) cause heart disease. We now know that is false (supposedly) because the very same scientific community that has been telling us for years that it was gospel, is now tellins us they were wrong! Stick that one in your "majority vote determins scientific truth" pipe and smoke it. Jordan
Communists: I still hate them even after they changed their name to "liberals".
____________________
My boss asked why I wasn't working. I told him I was being a democrat for Halloween.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,041
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,041 |
Here's another article kicking the schit out of the global warming thesis.... http://nypost.com/2013/12/05/global-warming-proof-is-evaporating/
Communists: I still hate them even after they changed their name to "liberals".
____________________
My boss asked why I wasn't working. I told him I was being a democrat for Halloween.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,910
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,910 |
Not to hard to figure things like these out.
Just follow the money.
Plain and simple
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 24,239
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 24,239 |
"Now which is easier to believe. 15,000 scientists across the world in on a big scam."
Since you have asked the question twice, I think you deserve an answer:
Of course they are. Follow the money. If I had enough money, do you think I would have any trouble finding scientists to do research to "prove" a 270 Win. is superior to a 270 WBY.?
Never holler whoa or look back in a tight place
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 58,971
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 58,971 |
Of course they are. Follow the money. If I had enough money, do you think I would have any trouble finding scientists to do research to "prove" a 270 Win. is superior to a 270 WBY.? I have always been amazed at the large # of folks that are so willing to sell their souls to make a buck, mind boggling to say the least.
Paul
"I'd rather see a sermon than hear a sermon".... D.A.D.
Trump Won!, Sandmann Won!, Rittenhouse Won!, Suck it Liberal Fuuktards.
molɔ̀ːn labé skýla
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
I don't think the science is ever settled. But we have enough to go on, and neither side is making what I consider rational decisions. The left wants us in the stone ages, and the righ want to act like nothing's about; neither are rational. The left does not want "us" in the stone age. They want people that aren't them in the stone age. Travis Wouldn't that be "us"??
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
So you believe there is a problem but you don't want to help fix it, if you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem.
You're by no means a stupid person Kevin but you sure do say some of the stupidest schit I've ever heard. Quit drinking the koolaid and I bet you'd come out of the fog. I guess you missed my other posts. I think we're already doing a lot to address the issue. My once a month BBQ isn't the problem, I'll guarantee you that.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
I don't think the science is ever settled. But we have enough to go on, and neither side is making what I consider rational decisions. The left wants us in the stone ages, and the righ want to act like nothing's about; neither are rational. The left does not want "us" in the stone age. They want people that aren't them in the stone age. Travis Wouldn't that be "us"?? No. Because that would imply "everybody" or an all inclusive reduction in modern day living for the sake of the greater good. Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
"Now which is easier to believe. 15,000 scientists across the world in on a big scam."
Since you have asked the question twice, I think you deserve an answer:
Of course they are. Follow the money. If I had enough money, do you think I would have any trouble finding scientists to do research to "prove" a 270 Win. is superior to a 270 WBY.?
Again, that's like saying the cardiologist has to be wrong about your diagnosis because he stands to make money treating you. The scientists happen to be on the government tit because that's the kind of research they do; government kind. So because of that, you'll just ignore ANYTHING they come up with?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
Okay so what about this guy. He's not on the government tit, and he was paid by guys who specifically wanted him to come down on the side of the deniers. What's his motivation. If you follow the money, he should have come down with something completely different. http://disinfo.com/2012/07/koch-bro...ong-global-warming-is-real-and-man-made/And follow the money with the oil companies...they all stand to lose from climate change, yet not one of them take the stance that climate change isn't real or man made.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
I don't think the science is ever settled. But we have enough to go on, and neither side is making what I consider rational decisions. The left wants us in the stone ages, and the righ want to act like nothing's about; neither are rational. The left does not want "us" in the stone age. They want people that aren't them in the stone age. Travis Wouldn't that be "us"?? No. Because that would imply "everybody" or an all inclusive reduction in modern day living for the sake of the greater good. Travis We're saying the same thing, you're just arguing semantics. But we're still on the same page. They want us in caves, they want to live in their massive mansions and be the ruling elite.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,580
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,580 |
There are well over 15,000 scientists across the world who are onboard with climate change being man made. Are you telling me that all 15,000 are in on the conspiracy?
No, there are not. There are well over 15,000 who say we CONTRIBUTE to it. Big difference. Especially when you consider that around 10k years ago my cabin was under a thick sheet of ice......one that melted without any help from the human race. Eventually our sun will expand and engulf the rock we live on in flames. Just something to think about. (I am not saying we shouldn't be prudent and good stewards of our resources, jut pointing out that it may not be an awesome idea to destroy economies trying to fight something that we barely have any impact on)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
We're saying the same thing,
No we're not. Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,691
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,691 |
Okay so what about this guy. He's not on the government tit, and he was paid by guys who specifically wanted him to come down on the side of the deniers. What's his motivation. If you follow the money, he should have come down with something completely different. http://disinfo.com/2012/07/koch-bro...ong-global-warming-is-real-and-man-made/And follow the money with the oil companies...they all stand to lose from climate change, yet not one of them take the stance that climate change isn't real or man made. I need you to explain how the oil companies stand to lose money from "climate change"? It's almost as naive as the belief, by morons, that when the government "sticks it to big business" through astronomical tax rates, that it is not the consumers that pay all of that tax through an increase in product cost.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." TJ
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing". EB
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33,856
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33,856 |
"Now which is easier to believe. 15,000 scientists across the world in on a big scam."
Since you have asked the question twice, I think you deserve an answer:
Of course they are. Follow the money. If I had enough money, do you think I would have any trouble finding scientists to do research to "prove" a 270 Win. is superior to a 270 WBY.?
Was a time all the scientists believed the earth flat. The fact Greenland used to be green proves to me the earth was warmer before there were cars.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time by the blood of patriots and tyrants.
If being stupid allows me to believe in Him, I'd wish to be a retard. Eisenhower and G Washington should be good company.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
I need you to explain how the oil companies stand to lose money from "climate change"? It's almost as naive as the belief, by morons, that when the government "sticks it to big business" through astronomical tax rates, that it is not the consumers that pay all of that tax through an increase in product cost.
So you don't think the carbon credit scheme of Kyoto isn't costing oil companies money?
Last edited by GunGeek; 01/28/15.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33,856
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33,856 |
There are well over 15,000 scientists across the world who are onboard with climate change being man made. Are you telling me that all 15,000 are in on the conspiracy?
No, there are not. There are well over 15,000 who say we CONTRIBUTE to it. Big difference. Especially when you consider that around 10k years ago my cabin was under a thick sheet of ice......one that melted without any help from the human race. Eventually our sun will expand and engulf the rock we live on in flames. Just something to think about. (I am not saying we shouldn't be prudent and good stewards of our resources, jut pointing out that it may not be an awesome idea to destroy economies trying to fight something that we barely have any impact on) Unless the sun burns out and then it will get colder than a well diggers a__ on this old rock.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time by the blood of patriots and tyrants.
If being stupid allows me to believe in Him, I'd wish to be a retard. Eisenhower and G Washington should be good company.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,081
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,081 |
This discussion would be a hell of a lot better reading if you guys would stop quoting gungeek.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
Unless the sun burns out and then it will get colder than a well diggers a__ on this old rock.
I hate it when that happens.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33,856
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33,856 |
Kevin, when your lying govt is telling you carbon dioxide is poisonous then i take everything they say with a gos. I guess you can say water is poison too if you drink too much too quick.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time by the blood of patriots and tyrants.
If being stupid allows me to believe in Him, I'd wish to be a retard. Eisenhower and G Washington should be good company.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,913
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,913 |
This discussion would be a hell of a lot better reading if you guys would stop quoting gungeek. Here is a tip you. A person can dislike Obama and his policies and still question those whose stances oppose him. A Pole in 1939 may have cheered the Russians.....for a while.
When a country is well governed, poverty and a mean condition are something to be ashamed of. When a country is ill governed, riches and honors are something to be ashamed of
. Confucius
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,081
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,081 |
This discussion would be a hell of a lot better reading if you guys would stop quoting gungeek. Here is a tip you. A person can dislike Obama and his policies and still question those whose stances oppose him. A Pole in 1939 may have cheered the Russians.....for a while. I put Gibson on ignore yesterday. I will toggle his posts down in the shooting/ reloading forums as he seems quite knowledgeable in those areas, but I've read enough of his crap up here. If I want to read some socialis democrat propaganda I'll go over to DU.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,659 |
Thanks Mog...but I'm neither socialist or a democrat; I think they're both FOS.
I just happen to find credibility in the global warming science; that's it. I'm not promoting any sort of agenda, just agreeing with the science. Why is that so criminal? Are we not allowed to see things differently, or am I require to always follow the hive mind while at the Campfire?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,580
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,580 |
There are well over 15,000 scientists across the world who are onboard with climate change being man made. Are you telling me that all 15,000 are in on the conspiracy?
No, there are not. There are well over 15,000 who say we CONTRIBUTE to it. Big difference. Especially when you consider that around 10k years ago my cabin was under a thick sheet of ice......one that melted without any help from the human race. Eventually our sun will expand and engulf the rock we live on in flames. Just something to think about. (I am not saying we shouldn't be prudent and good stewards of our resources, jut pointing out that it may not be an awesome idea to destroy economies trying to fight something that we barely have any impact on) Unless the sun burns out and then it will get colder than a well diggers a__ on this old rock. It expands (to a diameter that would include our orbit) before it goes out. At least that is what they told me back in school.....along with warnings about the next ice age that was coming...... 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,691
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,691 |
I need you to explain how the oil companies stand to lose money from "climate change"? It's almost as naive as the belief, by morons, that when the government "sticks it to big business" through astronomical tax rates, that it is not the consumers that pay all of that tax through an increase in product cost.
So you don't think the carbon credit scheme of Kyoto isn't costing oil companies money? No, they just pass on any additional costs to the customers that purchase their goods. If the cost of doing business is $1/unit, or $1.10/unit, it doesn't matter to them...they just mark it up and pass on the additional costs to consumers.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." TJ
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing". EB
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,827
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,827 |
kenjs1,
Here's a little head's up. There are not two sides of the truth. There are those who reject it and those who accept it.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation."
Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,363
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,363 |
Did they start that right after they faked the moon landings? There are well over 15,000 scientists across the world who are onboard with climate change being man made. Are you telling me that all 15,000 are in on the conspiracy? Theory du jour - remember 40 years ago the "doom & gloom" scientists were all warning of an impending ice age. Anyone who believes man has altered climate to a substantial degree - is over-exagerating man's importance in God's plan, in my estimation. We are not that important! As far as emissions - .001% (or less) is a minimal amount, by any rational thought. Volcanoes vs cars - hmmm!
I've always been a curmudgeon - now I'm an old curmudgeon.
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238 |
Hey guys....keep track of the responses and you'll be able to tell who the 'liberal progressives' are!! That's easy, you can smell the sweating pigs from their 'apologist/white guilt' shacks.
Trump Won!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33,856
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33,856 |
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time by the blood of patriots and tyrants.
If being stupid allows me to believe in Him, I'd wish to be a retard. Eisenhower and G Washington should be good company.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,913
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,913 |
kenjs1,
Here's a little head's up. There are not two sides of the truth. There are those who reject it and those who accept it. Agree Ringman, and there are those who never look at both sides an issue to see through the politics of it.
When a country is well governed, poverty and a mean condition are something to be ashamed of. When a country is ill governed, riches and honors are something to be ashamed of
. Confucius
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,913
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,913 |
kenjs1,
Here's a little head's up. There are not two sides of the truth. There are those who reject it and those who accept it. Agree Ringman. Unfortunately many view those sides as either entirely pro or entirely anti-Obama as evidenced by the eagerness labels are thrown about here.
Last edited by kenjs1; 01/29/15.
When a country is well governed, poverty and a mean condition are something to be ashamed of. When a country is ill governed, riches and honors are something to be ashamed of
. Confucius
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,605
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,605 |
Fossil fuels are a different deal. As the argument goes, fossil fuels are sequestered and out of the carbon cycle. It's only when man brings the sequestered carbon back into the cycle do they contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.
except it doesnt stay sequestered....if yah know what the phug your looking at driving through western North Dakota you can see where millions and millions of tons of coal burned off well before man was seriously in the picture turning a hell of alot of clay subsoil into a natural ceramic....
A serious student of the "Armchair Safari" always looking for Africa/Asia hunting books
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,605
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,605 |
also more oil leaks out of the floor of the Gulf every day than was lost in the Deep Water Horizon incident thats broken down by bacteria into CO2 and similar......tons of methane leaking out of deep water pockets aswell, whole ecosystems thrive off the chit....there are huge, really phuggin huge craters in the North Sea where large pockets of methane were loosed into the atmosphere in a very short order....this happened tens of thousands of years ago....
A serious student of the "Armchair Safari" always looking for Africa/Asia hunting books
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,913
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,913 |
Interesting stuff Rattler.
When a country is well governed, poverty and a mean condition are something to be ashamed of. When a country is ill governed, riches and honors are something to be ashamed of
. Confucius
|
|
|
|
|
567 members (10gaugeman, 10gaugemag, 12344mag, 160user, 007FJ, 163bc, 53 invisible),
2,250
guests, and
1,136
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,604
Posts18,454,831
Members73,908
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
