24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 245
S
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
S
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 245
Pretty good test between the Barnes and the GMX here:

http://www.soarraptors.org/Documents/CopperBulletStudy.pdf

Not much difference between them...according to this test.

The only thing I have shot with them is one antelope buck. It was a headshot so not much of a test of the bullet (165 grain .308 from a 30-06). In my rifle they are not as accurate as the Interlocks, but shoot around an inch and a quarter, at least in Superformance guise. Haven't played with them handloading yet, but hope to soon.

GB1

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 5,489
A
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
A
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 5,489
Originally Posted by Mule Deer


However, my experience with bullets like the TSX, E-Tip and GMX in general is they kill better when really zipping along. Don't see many advantages in them at muzzle velocities much under 3000 fps--except, of course, where non-lead bullets are mandated by law.


In my very limited experience I would certainly agree with this statement. 168 grain (moly) Barnes seemed to hammer AK game to include moose.


Bob
Enjoy life now -- it has an expiration date.
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,123
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,123
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
You think anyone with a .270 here on the Fire, would actually admit it..?? blush

Hmmm...

DF


Dirtfarmer;
Good evening to you sir, hopefully this final Monday of January was an acceptable one for you.

So I think that I can now admit that I "once" had a .270 - at "one time" and have since had it rebarreled. blush

Anyway without looking at my hunting log, I know I shot at least 3 bucks with the 130 GMX and switched to the 130gr TTSX after a bit - partially because they shot a wee bit better and partially to see what difference there was - if any.

There was not much difference as far as I was able to ascertain from tissue damage or the one sample of each that was recovered.

[Linked Image]

I believe that the TTSX is on the right and the GMX is on the left. They both weigh very close to the same weight, again sorry I'd have to dig up the notes to get the exact weight but I don't think either one lost a grain.

The particular .270 barrel I had happened to be a slower than usual twist - 1:11 � as close as I can measure - and didn't give typical .270 velocities, so that might have some bearing on the bullet performance.

That said, if I traded into another .270 tomorrow, I'd have no hesitation whatsoever using either GMX or TTSX bullet.

Hopefully that was useful information for the OP or someone out there tonight - not that any of us would admit to using a .270..... wink

All the best to you this week Dirtfarmer.

Dwayne



The most important stuff in life isn't "stuff"

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,078
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,078
Originally Posted by BC30cal
I believe that the TTSX is on the right and the GMX is on the left.

At the risk of nitpicking, I think that's reversed based on outward appearances.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,913
B
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,913

I shoot the 80 GMX from my .243 Win over 45gr imr-4350. Accuracy is 3/4" or less as long as I pull my booger hook correctly and the small sample of whitetails I've killed with them have been impressed. Complete penetration and blood trails that are heavy and short.

I shoot the blems from Midwayusa.


When I die I hope I don't start voting democrat.
IC B2

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,057
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,057
Thanks, Dwayne, for that heart felt .270 confession... blush

I know it made you feel better... grin

To me, monometals do best blasted at max vel. I don't like small caliber mono's as well as mid and large bore ones. I use Scirocco's, NPT's and similar in .224-6mm guns for WT's and hogs. I do like E-Tip 120's in my 26 Nosler, as I've posted already and the 250 TSX in my .45-70.

IF I was so disposed to work with a .270 (in the closet, of course), I'd consider 130 monometals at max vel. I think those would work pretty well.

BTW, the TTSX has driving bands like the bullet on the left... smile

DF


Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,057
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,057
I'd even try the 110 TSX BT at 3,400-3,500 fps, just to see what it would do. The 130 version could be pushed around 3,100-3,200 fps. I'd want to see how they grouped.

DF

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,123
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,123
Originally Posted by Whttail_in_MT
Originally Posted by BC30cal
I believe that the TTSX is on the right and the GMX is on the left.

At the risk of nitpicking, I think that's reversed based on outward appearances.

Whttail in MT;
Good evening to you sir, hopefully your day was an acceptable one.

Thanks for the gentle correction, you know I knew which was which but so help me my fingers typed it wrong anyway.... blush

It wasn't nitpicking at all and I appreciate your taking the time to help me get it straight.

All the best to you in the remainder of the week.

Dwayne


The most important stuff in life isn't "stuff"

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,078
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,078
I thought maybe you were looking at the picture from the other side. grin

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,123
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,123
Dirtfarmer;
Thanks for the reply and the nice manner in which you conveyed my backwards post as well.

So far we had good success with 80gr TTSX in our daughter's .250AI which are the smallest monometal we've run and they've killed deer extremely well.

I'd add that in addition to velocity we've seen really fine results with monometals twisted fast in more moderate velocities such as our eldest daughter's 6.5x55.

Thanks again for the kind response and all the best to you.

Dwayne


The most important stuff in life isn't "stuff"

IC B3

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,123
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,123
Originally Posted by Whttail_in_MT
I thought maybe you were looking at the picture from the other side. grin


Whttail;
Well I can see how you'd think that seeing as I'm on the other side of the medicine line and all. wink

Really I believe I'll need to stop posting later on in the evening when I'm that sleepy.

Thanks for the chuckle and all the best to you sir.

Dwayne


The most important stuff in life isn't "stuff"

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,210
P
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,210
I did some primitive testing with .30 cal 150 grain GMX bullets

http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/7039270/2

Good accuracy (note those groups are at 200 yards. I will see if I can find a link to a video of young bison I executed. I think they work very well.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,919
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,919
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
You think anyone with a .270 here on the Fire, would actually admit it..?? blush

Hmmm...

DF

You bet! grin

I have three hunting loads always at the ready for any new 270's that might find a way to my house.

130gr TSX, TTSX, & GMX all over 60gr H4831sc. I can always find one load that will shoot around an inch and sometimes two or all three.

I have no qualms using any for hunting.

I have also used the 85gr TSX and 110gr TTSX/TSX succesfully out my 270's.


Arcus Venator
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,057
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,057
I see on Barnes' web site, you can run their 85 TSX at 3,800 fps, their 95 TTSX at 3,700 fps, and their 110 TSX at 3,500 fps.

Those loads should be real bombs on WT sized targets. I don't know how accurate the lighter ones would be, but these are some interesting combos.

How did the lighter bullets perform?

DF

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,949
V
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
V
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,949
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
I'd even try the 110 TSX BT at 3,400-3,500 fps, just to see what it would do. The 130 version could be pushed around 3,100-3,200 fps. I'd want to see how they grouped.

DF

I can tell you the 110 TTSX at 3400fps from a vanilla .270 does very well on pigs and a couple of blacktail. I can also tell you the Hornady 110Vmax takes the same loads, hit the same point of impact to 500 yards and are a heck of a lot cheaper to practice with.


Hunt hard, kill clean, waste nothing and offer no apologies.

"In rifle work, group size is of some interest...but it is well to remember that a rifleman does not shoot groups, he shoots shots." Jeff Cooper

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,919
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,919
Quote
How did the lighter bullets perform?

DF


Dead critters when we did our job. The 110's have taken numerous deer, hogs, antelope, a blackbuck and Axis.

The 85 was used in a reduced load for my son. 1900fps, 100 & 106 yard shot, complete pass through and two dead deer. I never pushed them hard, but should try it sometime.


Arcus Venator
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 64
H
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
H
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 64
Originally Posted by CRS
The 85 was used in a reduced load for my son. 1900fps, 100 & 106 yard shot, complete pass through and two dead deer. I never pushed them hard, but should try it sometime.

What was the load? Where did you get the starting data? I tried to get some reduced load data from Barnes but was unsuccessful.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,919
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,919
I used H4895 per Hodgdon website.


Arcus Venator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,755
D
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,755
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by 16bore
I'd love to see some mono y mono tests between Barnes, Hornady, and Nosler.

Yep.

And at two or three velocity ranges.

That would be a lot of work, for sure.

DF


That's what gun writers are for. That's why they get paid the big bucks. smile


He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice.

- Albert Einstein
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,272
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,272
Shot two Mulies out west[Eastern Sierra's] with 165 GMX's from my Ruger MkII .30-'06. Pretty much dead right after the shot, about 200-225 yards. One didn't move, other than tipping over, the other staggered maybe 10-15 yards, plop. I don't recall MV, as my notes are packed for moving, but thinking 2850-2875fps might be about right. Powder was/is Ramshot Hunter: 59.5gr.
Hope this helps.

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

564 members (1beaver_shooter, 10gaugemag, 1234, 19rabbit52, 12344mag, 1_deuce, 52 invisible), 2,030 guests, and 1,112 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,088
Posts18,463,966
Members73,923
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.059s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9023 MB (Peak: 1.0572 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-23 16:07:38 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS