24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,779
D
Dude270 Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,779
Thanks guys

GB1

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,652
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,652
My first true varmint rifle was a 220 Swift so I have been loading for it since the early 70's, my favorite with a 1-14" twist is W760/H414, Fed210 primer and 55gr Blitzkings. in some barrels I had great results with RL15

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,091
D
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
D
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,091
Originally Posted by whelennut
Varget and 55 gr. HORNADY V MAX will not dissapoint.
whelennut



My Swift would not stabilize that combination except at elevations above 5400'. That bullet is just too long for a 14 twist.

I ended up with about 10 boxes of handloaded ammo that was topped with 55 grain Sisk bullets. I pulled a few and weighed the charges and they were as advertised. The powder was 4064. These loads were stupid accurate and I have never been able to better 4064 for accuracy. I haven't tried all the wonder powders in it but I tried everything I could get 15 years ago. If I were to load for it again I would try Hunter and maybe Big Game.

My Swift would not stabilize the 60 grain Partition nor the 52 grain Amax. I hate the 14 twist. Rifle is a pre-64.


NRA Benefactor Member

Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,249
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,249
Originally Posted by ClarkEMyers
I'm inclined to go with 414/760/2700 and shorter bullets in a 1/14 twist for high velocity explosive bullets. Meters well for a loading session with a progressive that gives me enough loads for a while in a single loading session. I might take very light big game as targets of opportunity but only at close ranges where the bullet carries most of the energy it started with so 60 grain round nose works.

In particular having learned from Bryan Litz (and reminded by John Barsness that bullet speed is no substitute for faster twist) that a barely stabilized bullet has an effective ballistic coefficient much lower than advertised I reserve the lovely little plastic tipped boat tailed 53 grain Hornady and Barnes bullets for the appropriate twists rather than kid myself when elevation and meteo conditions combined with pushing them to the limit show stability on paper. I now think they may be stable enough to shoot acceptable groups but I'm not getting the benefit of the advertised ballistic coefficient with these longer bullets so I've gained nothing but the ability to shoot more expensive bullets.

I figure the temperature sensitivity doesn't matter that much to me because I don't tote the rifle around in extreme heat anyway but use something else.

My own is a very heavy Hart barrel and very much a niche rifle - hold on hair to long eyeballed ranges but not a laser the range and dial it in with high ballistic coefficient bullets -that don't work in a 1/14 twist anyway - rifle.
My last barrel is a Shilen, and a faster twist, I think 1-10 and I AI'd the chamber to hopefully slow down the trimming, and it seems to work. With 47 H414 and a 55 Sierra, goes 3990 fps and is the best shooting barrel I've had, on a still day, it will shoot in the .3's consistently for five shots. It is an old 700 that I've had for somewhere around 35 years that was built by Ed Brown.

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 376
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 376
For years I happily shot rock chucks with 52gn Sierras or Hornadys and IMR4064. Got about 3850fps from a 26" bbl. Lately switched to Reloader 17 for higher velocity and even better groups.

With 55gn Ballistic Tips or Ballistic Silvertips my top pick is R17 followed closely by 2000MR and H4350.

With 60gn Partitions R17 is tops. H4831 gives tiny groups but lower velocity.

Walt


One unerring mark of the love of the truth is not entertaining any proposition with greater assurance than the proofs it is built upon will warrant. John Locke, 1690
IC B2

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 22,274
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 22,274
I wonder how Big Game would work in it.


"...the designer of the .270 Ingwe cartridge!..."

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,076
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,076
Big Game works pretty well. Back when the Ramshot powders were first introduced, I had a Ruger 1B in .220 Swift, with the 26" barrel. They didn't introduce Hunter for a few more years, so I tried Big Game with 55-grain Ballistic Tips. The maximum load they listed back then (it's probably changed) got around 3900 fps, but accuracy was just so-so, around 1-1/2". I called the head tech at Western Powders and he suggested I try magnum primers. That cut group size in half.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,779
D
Dude270 Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,779
John
The only ramshot powder I have on hand is TAC. When ramshot powders become more available I will try Hunter.

Do you think a 60 grain partition will stabilize in the 14 twist?

I'm thinking 4064, 4895 and RL 15 will get first shot with 55 and 60 grain bullets. How about Varget, It seems like it would be worth a shot


Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,091
D
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
D
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,091
Originally Posted by Dude270
John
The only ramshot powder I have on hand is TAC. When ramshot powders become more available I will try Hunter.

Do you think a 60 grain partition will stabilize in the 14 twist?

I'm thinking 4064, 4895 and RL 15 will get first shot with 55 and 60 grain bullets. How about Varget, It seems like it would be worth a shot



Unless they changedthe bullet, they won't. They wouldn't stabilize in mine at 1500' elevation. Never shot them when I lived at 5400'. That 14 twist is a huge handicap nowdays.


NRA Benefactor Member

Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,773
W
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
W
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,773
dennisinaz, I have used the 6o grain Partitions in my old .22-250 and my Swift.. Both shot fine.. I haven't used them in elevations much less than 2000 feet, but they have killed deer and turkey in Pa. and W. Va. All of my guns are 1-14.. But it could also be the individual rifles..


Molon Labe
IC B3

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,779
D
Dude270 Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,779
I wondered if the partitions would be hit and miss.
I shoot between 2000 and 3000'. I think they might be worth a shot.

I wonder how much better performance the partition offers over the 60 grain hornady and the 63 SMP anyway

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,076
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,076
I suspect the "exact" 1-14 twist affects how well the 60-grain Partitions stabilize. Twist will vary slightly in barrels, except (usually) for hammer-forged barrels. The 60 Partition is right on the margin for stability in a 14 twist, and any little thing will cause problems, such as the twist actually being, say, 1-14.3.

In my last Swift, a tang-safety Ruger 77, it wouldn't shoot consistently unless I took the rifle up to about 7000 feet up in the mountains. Even at 4000 feet on a warm summer day, in a 5-shot group 2-3 would land close together, and the others would scatter, sometimes into 3" or more. This was in a rifle that would put five 55-grain Sierra hollow-points into 1/2" or so.

I finally quit trying to get them to shoot consistently in supposed 14 twists, because too often it was a waste of bullets, powder, primers and time. They're much more consistent in a 1-12 barrel, the standard .223 twist, and often shoot really well in a 1-9 or 1-8.

There's another advantage in "over-stabilizing" them: BC is higher. They ain't the sleekest bullet anyway, so I'll take any edge possible.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,810
D
djs Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,810
I've been reloading the 220 Swift since 1958 (off and on). I started with IMR-4064 and have gone to Reloader 15 now. the IMR-4064 shot accurately, but it meters though the powder measure like gravel; the Relocader-15 is smooth. I stick to published loads. the Swift is a vastly under-rated cartridge -it's really good.

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,943
W
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,943
I have been following this thread pretty close since I am about pick up a new Swift. I would like to ask those familiar here if I would be better suited with one bullet over the other.

I will probably fire more shots at paper and steel than anything else but do plan on taking it to the field occasionally. No Prarie dogs or chucks down here...most varmints will likely be crows and the occasional coyote. We have bobcats too but don't expect I will ever pull the trigger on one with this rifle...mostly because I wouldn't want to tear the hide to pieces.

I have been thing about the 53gr Vmax or any of the NBTS but would love to know what would be suggested for the application.

Already have plenty of Reloder 15 and can get 4064 easily enough too.

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,779
D
Dude270 Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,779
The 53 vmax is a long bullet and I know a few people who have tried them in 1 in 14 22-250's and couldn;t get them to stabilize.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,055
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,055
Originally Posted by War_Eagle
We have bobcats too but don't expect I will ever pull the trigger on one with this rifle...mostly because I wouldn't want to tear the hide to pieces.

I have been thing about the 53gr Vmax or any of the NBTS but would love to know what would be suggested for the application.

Already have plenty of Reloder 15 and can get 4064 easily enough too.
I'd suggest a faster than 1/14 twist. I'd also suggest a .204 chambering.

At the risk of repeating myself the 53 gr. VMax is a lovely bullet and a bad choice for a 1/14 Swift. For 1/14 twist the sort of 50/52/53 grain bullets that were popular when the Swift was popular make a fine retro combination. I suppose the newer bullets will do fine in a faster twist but they don't in a 1/14 twist and there is little point in trying. Mine is a 26" Hart plenty accurate and speedy but speed doesn't make up for the slow twist - as I say retro. I even have a Quick Measure for log type powders and I see no reason save desperation to use 4064 in a cartridge I shoot more than a box a year maybe Garands excepted.

I'd feel comfortable using a well chosen bullet at Swift velocities to not exit a bobcat on most well chosen shots - at least I don't know anything better except a trap.

Last edited by ClarkEMyers; 03/07/15.
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,253
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,253
Im going to go a bit off topic here, 4064 is your friend! I have owned 3 220 Swifts, the first was a very early tang safety varmint barrel Ruger, it shot anything you stuck in it to a 1/2 inch if you could half shoot! I did not know when I bought it new with a 6 x 18 ao redfield but Douglas made the barrels back then. (1970's), I traded that gun to buy a 59' Winchester Varminter ( Win made 904)in swift, it shoots as well BUT is a lot more picky on ammo !!! I also own and bought a NIB mid 50's std mod 70 with an internal adjustment 10X unertl scope, so far an inch is best I have found ammo on that gun. The Ruger had well over 3000 rounds thru it and still would shoot into 3/4 inch when I sold it to a guy in NM.I sent many a fellow back to Tallahassee FL from the coon bottom gun club minus many 100 dollar bills with that gun! OK, I started out shooting Yellow Winchester super X ammo ....HOT stuff, then a case of hot Norma. Guys I moved to Hornady grey box custom ammo I bought by the case lots from a now closed outfit named Lock, Stock and Barrel, the ammo was slow compared to Norma and Winchester BUT super,super accurate. LONG story short warp speed does not always mean tack driver accurate! DAMN I wish I had my Ruger back! On handloading the 4064 was the bomb! very best WinPoor
I save all brass and boxes I think the Hornady was a 50 or 55 gr bullet loaded to about 3800 fps, not the fastest BUT damn it is cloverleaf, one hole stuff, i do not know what their new stuff is or what they have now that took this stuffs place!

Last edited by winchesterpoor; 03/07/15.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,634
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,634
Originally Posted by War_Eagle
I have been following this thread pretty close since I am about pick up a new Swift. I would like to ask those familiar here if I would be better suited with one bullet over the other.

I will probably fire more shots at paper and steel than anything else but do plan on taking it to the field occasionally. No Prarie dogs or chucks down here...most varmints will likely be crows and the occasional coyote. We have bobcats too but don't expect I will ever pull the trigger on one with this rifle...mostly because I wouldn't want to tear the hide to pieces.

I have been thing about the 53gr Vmax or any of the NBTS but would love to know what would be suggested for the application.

Already have plenty of Reloder 15 and can get 4064 easily enough too.


50 grain Sierra blitz. tough little bullet. Handled 3800 out of my Swift easily.



Swifty
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,091
D
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
D
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,091
I sold my Swift as I couldn't find a decent big game bullet than would stabilize in my 14 (or worse) twist and it was too heavy to use for calling coyotes. I have a couple of 22-250s with 14 twist and I have settled on 50 Blitzkings myself. I also use this bullet in my 222 (probably a 14 twist) for calling coyotes.

I agree that 4064 is probably the worst of the rat turd powders for metering through a powder measure. I would sure try some new ball powders first if I went back to it.

For whatever reason, the best powders in the 22-250 were not the best powders in the Swift, even with the same bullets. I mostly use TAC in my 22-250 with the 50s. I liked H380 when I shot 55s.


NRA Benefactor Member

Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,076
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,076
When I use 4064 anymore (and I do occasionally) it's the Accurate Powders version, which is short-cut. Haven't tried it in the Swift because I don't own one anymore, but it worked well in every other cartridge I've tried it in, with very similar results to IMR4064 without the hassle of log-sized grains.

But based on previous experience with IMR4064 in several Swifts I can't believe it somehow beats a bunch of other powders, whether H414/W760/A2700, Reloder 15, Big Game and Hunter, etc. etc.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

127 members (44mc, 7x57Hunter, 10Glocks, 7887mm08, 808outdoors, 21, 14 invisible), 1,653 guests, and 740 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,280
Posts18,467,688
Members73,928
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.084s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9014 MB (Peak: 1.0595 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 09:43:05 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS