24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,713
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,713
Nothing except the economics of offering barrel twist options in a $300 rifle. Makes more sense to pick one and sell it.

It's also possible that a really fast twist might run up pressures with factory ammo. Not every one reloads. They're selling a bargain-priced rifle to appeal to and meet the requirements of the average schmuck, not just rifle cranks. If they thought the world was clamoring for an 8" .22/250, they'd build it.

Write 'em a letter.

Last edited by Pappy348; 03/21/15.

What fresh Hell is this?
GB1

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
D
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
The world is already clamoring for something different than a 14 twist 22-250.

For sure, they should have just gone with an 8 twist and cornered the market from the get-go.

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
S
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
S
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
Originally Posted by Pappy348
Nothing except the economics of offering barrel twist options in a $300 rifle. Makes more sense to pick one and sell it.

It's also possible that a really fast twist might run up pressures with factory ammo. Not every one reloads. They're selling a bargain-priced rifle to appeal to and meet the requirements of the average schmuck, not just rifle cranks. If they thought the world was clammoring for an 8" .22/250, they'd build it.

Write 'em a letter.


The world is, they just don't know it.

Don't worry, I expect to see a 1-8" twist RAR soon.


"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,805
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,805
Originally Posted by Pappy348
Nothing except the economics of offering barrel twist options in a $300 rifle. Makes more sense to pick one and sell it.

It's also possible that a really fast twist might run up pressures with factory ammo. Not every one reloads. They're selling a bargain-priced rifle to appeal to and meet the requirements of the average schmuck, not just rifle cranks. If they thought the world was clammoring for an 8" .22/250, they'd build it.

Write 'em a letter.


Highly unlikely.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,445
FVA Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,445
Originally Posted by Pappy348
Nothing except the economics of offering barrel twist options in a $300 rifle. Makes more sense to pick one and sell it.



Yep and it should be a 1 in 8 or just leave it at 1 in 12/14.
No issues with increasing pressures of factory ammo developed for slower twists. That ground has been gone over.


IC B2

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,514
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,514
hornady says a 1-10 will work with their 68 grain bthp.
also warn against fast twist for some of their bullets.

[Linked Image]


**********************
[the member formerly known as fluffy}
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,713
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,713
Originally Posted by FVA
Originally Posted by Pappy348
Nothing except the economics of offering barrel twist options in a $300 rifle. Makes more sense to pick one and sell it.



Yep and it should be a 1 in 8 or just leave it at 1 in 12/14.
No issues with increasing pressures of factory ammo developed for slower twists. That ground has been gone over.


I didn't get that memo, but I'll take your word for it.

The point is, right or wrong, there's a reason they went with a 10" twist. Could just be some guy in R&D thinks that's the best thing ever. With most companies still making them with 12" twists, Ruger probably thinks they're being cutting edge and reckless. I checked some loading manuals to see what twist they used for the .22//250 and a couple others in that performance bracket and they were all over the place, from 1-8 on a .223 WSSM to 1-14 on some others.

I'd like to know who it is at Ruger that thinks we all want 16.5" barrels on our hunting rifles, even short magnums. Having owned, briefly, an 18 1/2" .308, a 16.5 inch .300 wsm seems like a bad idea, but they pushed that concept pretty hard.

Last edited by Pappy348; 03/21/15.

What fresh Hell is this?
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,713
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,713
BTW, Nosler's on-line data has a separate section just for the fast-twist (8") .22/250, featuring some of their longer bullets.

The regular .22/250 data was created with a 1-14".

Last edited by Pappy348; 03/21/15.

What fresh Hell is this?
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

592 members (10gaugeman, 007FJ, 160user, 2500HD, 1beaver_shooter, 240NMC, 67 invisible), 2,336 guests, and 1,239 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,654
Posts18,455,538
Members73,909
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.090s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8337 MB (Peak: 0.9253 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-19 17:06:01 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS